Lemon Law: Out-Of-State Buyers' Rights Explained

Lemon laws are in place to protect car buyers from purchasing vehicles with serious defects or safety issues. While all 50 states and the District of Columbia have lemon laws, the specifics of each law vary. In most states, lemon laws cover new vehicles, but some states, like California, also cover used vehicles. Generally, lemon laws do not apply to out-of-state purchases, but there are exceptions, such as for military personnel in California.

Lemon laws are state-specific

California's lemon law, also known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, provides legal protection to consumers who purchase or lease new and used vehicles covered by a manufacturer's warranty. Under this law, a vehicle is considered a "lemon" if it has a substantial defect or recurring problem that the manufacturer cannot repair after a reasonable number of attempts. California's lemon law explicitly excludes automobiles that were not purchased at retail in California from coverage.

It's important to note that lemon laws typically only apply to new vehicles, and used cars are often excluded. However, some states, like California, may provide consumer protections for the purchase of defective or unsafe used vehicles as well.

If you're considering purchasing a vehicle, it's essential to familiarize yourself with your state's specific lemon laws to understand your rights and protections.

Lemon laws typically only apply to new vehicles

Lemon laws are consumer protection laws that typically apply to new car purchases. However, some states, such as California, Texas, and New York, have used car lemon laws as well.

Lemon laws are state-specific, and while they generally only apply to new vehicles, there are some exceptions. For example, in California, the lemon law covers new and used vehicles purchased or leased in the state that are still under a manufacturer's warranty.

If you purchase a vehicle in one state and move to another, the lemon laws of the state where you bought the car will apply. However, there may be exceptions if you move to a state with more comprehensive lemon laws. For instance, if you move to California with a vehicle purchased in another state, you may still be covered by California's lemon law if the manufacturer sells cars in California and your car is under warranty.

It's important to note that lemon laws vary from state to state, and it's always a good idea to consult with a local lemon law attorney to understand your specific situation and rights.

California's lemon law does not apply to vehicles purchased out of state

California's lemon law, also known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, is a law that provides legal protection to consumers who purchase or lease new and used vehicles covered by a manufacturer's warranty. However, this law does not apply to vehicles purchased out of state.

The California lemon law is explicit in its exclusion of automobiles not purchased at retail in California from coverage. This means that consumers who buy out-of-state vehicles will generally not qualify for protection under this law. Nevertheless, there may be certain factors that qualify vehicles ordered from out of state for coverage under California's lemon law.

For instance, California commercial code states that the title of a vehicle passes at the location where the seller completes the delivery. So, if you buy a vehicle initially purchased or leased in California and the manufacturer's warranty is still valid, you may be protected by the state's lemon law. Additionally, you don't have to be a California resident to invoke the lemon law. If you purchased or leased the vehicle in California, the law may cover you if the manufacturer is based in the state.

Furthermore, active-duty military personnel may be covered by California's lemon law, provided that the defective vehicle is under warranty and the manufacturer sells cars in the state. To be eligible, you must be stationed in California when you bought the car or initiated the lawsuit.

While California's lemon law does not apply to out-of-state purchases, you can still seek protection under federal lemon laws, such as the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which applies to all consumer products, including vehicles, sold within the United States with a written warranty. This federal law requires manufacturers to honour warranties and provide remedies if the product is defective.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, or federal lemon law, applies to all consumer products with a written warranty

Lemon laws are state-specific, and most states do not allow out-of-state lemon law claims. However, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, or federal lemon law, applies to all consumer products with a written warranty, including cars. This means that if you buy a vehicle outside of your home state and it turns out to be a lemon, you may still have recourse under federal law.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is a federal law that governs the content and regulation of consumer product warranties. It protects consumers' rights by detailing the obligations of warrantors that offer written warranties with their products. The Act also limits the restrictions that can be placed on implied warranties.

Under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, a written warranty must be titled either "full" or "limited." Warranties must outline the coverage they provide using language that is easy to understand, and they must be available to consumers wherever the product they cover is sold.

The Act also includes restrictions for implied warranties. Every consumer product sold comes with an implied warranty, which is created by operation of law. Although these warranties are not written, they still guarantee that products and services will satisfy consumers' reasonable expectations. In other words, implied warranties require consumer products to meet certain minimum levels of quality.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act protects consumers by making it easier to file breach-of-warranty claims after purchasing lemons. Importantly, the Act allows consumers to recover attorneys' fees, court costs, and other expenses when they prevail.

This fee-shifting provision levels the playing field and makes it feasible for consumers to bring claims against large corporations. It ensures that consumers who lack the funds to hire an attorney can still defend their rights.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, often referred to as the federal Lemon Law, applies to cars, trucks, motorcycles, and all other consumer products. It is broader than most state lemon laws and was enacted by Congress in 1975 with the automobile industry chiefly in mind.

To qualify as a lemon under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, you must provide the manufacturer of your vehicle with a reasonable opportunity to repair any defects. In some courts, as few as two to three repair attempts will suffice. The Act also extends the period during which you can make a claim, generally allowing you to file claims for up to four years after the vehicle's purchase or until four years after the warranty expires.

A consumer may recover significant damages under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, including compensation for overpaying for a defective vehicle (diminished value). In many instances, the Act also allows consumers to seek additional damages incurred, such as aggravation, inconvenience, loss of use, rental charges, and storage charges.

Lemon law defendants have argued that the court should deduct the amount of any contingency fee plaintiffs' attorneys may receive from the fees awarded

Lemon laws are consumer protection laws that apply to recently purchased cars with manufacturing defects. These laws vary from state to state, with some states covering new and used vehicles, while others only cover new vehicles. In general, if a vehicle has a defect, the customer is entitled to a repair, and if it cannot be repaired, they may be able to get a refund or a replacement vehicle.

Now, regarding your question about lemon law defendants arguing for the deduction of contingency fees from awarded fees, here is some detailed information:

Lemon law defendants have argued that the court should deduct any contingency fees that the plaintiff's attorneys may receive from the fees awarded. This argument is based on the idea that the plaintiff's retainer agreement with their attorneys includes a provision for the attorneys to receive a portion of the recovery. Defendants claim that by deducting the contingency fee from the awarded fees, the plaintiff's lawyers will receive less money, which could reduce the incentive for qualified attorneys to take up these cases. Additionally, it would result in guilty manufacturers paying less money.

However, this argument has been rejected by courts in states like California. The California Lemon Law, also known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, was created to protect consumers in the state and hold manufacturers accountable. The law allows for prevailing plaintiffs to recover their costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, which are determined by the court based on the actual time expended. The appellate court in California has made it clear that courts cannot consider contingency fees when making these fee awards. The court's sole task is to determine whether the actual fees billed for the tasks performed were reasonable and billed at a reasonable rate, regardless of any other compensation the plaintiff's attorney may receive.

The problem with the defendant's argument is that it undermines the purpose of the California Lemon Law, which is to protect consumers and incentivize attorneys to take on these cases. Reducing the fees awarded to plaintiffs' attorneys could discourage qualified lawyers from taking on lemon law cases, making it more difficult for consumers to find legal representation. Additionally, it would reduce the incentive for manufacturers to comply with their obligations to offer replacements or repurchases for defective vehicles.

Therefore, the courts in California have affirmed that the terms of a plaintiff's retainer agreement with their attorneys are legally irrelevant to the amount of fees awarded by the court. This decision ensures that plaintiffs' attorneys are adequately compensated for their work and encourages their continued representation of consumers in lemon law cases.

Frequently asked questions