Trumpcare: Law Or No-Go?

In 2017, the US House of Representatives introduced a bill called the American Healthcare Act (AHCA), also known as Trumpcare, which sought to amend and partially repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare. Trumpcare did not pass in the Senate and therefore did not become law, but President Trump's return to the White House in 2024 could embolden Republicans who want to weaken or repeal the ACA. During his 2024 campaign, Trump made conflicting statements about the future of Obamacare, but his record during his first term suggests that big changes could be in store, especially if Republicans maintain control of the House.

Trumpcare failed to become law in 2017 when it didn't pass in the Senate

In 2017, the American Health Care Act (colloquially known as Trumpcare) failed to become law when it didn't pass in the Senate. The bill was introduced by House Republicans in early 2017 and passed the House in a close vote on May 4, 2017. However, it faced opposition in the Senate, where Republicans sought to pass a similar bill, the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 (BCRA).

The BCRA faced opposition from several Republican senators, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell instead pushed for the Health Care Freedom Act (HCFA), or "skinny repeal," which would have only repealed the individual and employer mandates of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). On July 27, 2017, the Senate rejected the HCFA in a 51-49 vote, with three Republican senators joining all Senate Democrats in voting against it.

Despite efforts by Republican leaders to pass some form of ACA repeal, the 115th Congress ultimately did not pass an ACA repeal bill. This failure represented a significant setback for the Republican Party, which had campaigned on the promise of repealing the ACA since its passage in 2010.

Trumpcare would have removed the tax penalty for not having insurance

Trumpcare, or the Affordable Care Act (ACA), was an act signed into law in 2010 by U.S. President Barack Obama. This act was a dramatic overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system. Under the ACA, people were mandated to have health insurance coverage and would face tax penalties if they did not. This was known as the individual mandate.

In 2017, President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which repealed the tax penalty mandate from the ACA. As of 2019, Obamacare tax penalties are no longer in effect at the federal level. However, some states still require residents to pay a fee if they don't have health insurance. These states include New Jersey, Vermont, the District of Columbia, California, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts.

The individual mandate was an unpopular aspect of Obamacare, although it was put in place to drive compliance with the ACA. The repeal of the tax penalty removed the financial consequences of not carrying qualified health coverage. This change gave Americans more flexibility in choosing health plans that suit their needs and budgets.

Trump's administration worked to lower prescription drug prices, expand access to affordable coverage, deliver hospital and insurer price transparency, and allow Americans to access trusted doctors. They also took action to protect people with pre-existing conditions and to end surprise medical billing.

Trumpcare would have given control of Medicaid management to the states

Trumpcare, or the Affordable Care Act (ACA), is a highly contested topic in American politics. With Donald Trump's return to the White House and the Republicans taking full control of Congress in 2025, the ACA's Medicaid expansion is once again under threat. Trump has made it clear that his goal is to repeal the ACA, including its expansion of Medicaid to low-income adults, and to impose strict limits on federal Medicaid spending.

One of the key aspects of Trumpcare is its potential impact on Medicaid management. Under the ACA, the federal government encouraged states to expand their Medicaid programs to cover more low-income Americans who did not have health insurance through their jobs. This expansion was successful in extending health insurance to an estimated 21 million people and driving the uninsured rate in the US to record lows. However, with Trumpcare, the management of Medicaid would be handed over to the individual states.

The Trump administration has already taken steps to invite states to seek waivers that would significantly alter their Medicaid coverage for adults. These waivers would allow states to convert their Medicaid programs into block grants with capped federal funding and new authorities to cut coverage and benefits. This shift in management could have detrimental effects on the health and well-being of millions of Americans who rely on Medicaid coverage. It is estimated that more than 3 million adults across nine states would be at immediate risk of losing their health coverage if the Republicans reduce federal Medicaid funding.

The nine states with trigger laws that would end their Medicaid expansions if federal funding falls are Arizona, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah, and Virginia. These states have expanded Medicaid eligibility with federal funding, but if that funding is reduced, they will be forced to make up the difference or roll back their expansions. The decisions to keep or roll back the expansions will depend on the political landscape of each state.

While the future of Trumpcare and its impact on Medicaid management remains uncertain, the potential consequences for millions of Americans are significant. The shift in control to the states could result in reduced coverage, higher costs, and a negative impact on the health and financial stability of those who rely on Medicaid.

Trumpcare would have removed some requirements for healthcare insurers

Trumpcare, or the American Health Care Act, was US President Donald Trump's proposed replacement for the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. Trumpcare did not become law, but if it had, it would have removed some requirements for healthcare insurers.

Trumpcare would have given states more flexibility and relief from what Trump called "oppressive Obamacare regulations". It would have allowed states to tighten Medicaid eligibility through work requirements or other restrictions. It would also have loosened requirements for non-ACA-compliant plans that discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions.

Trumpcare would have eliminated the Obamacare individual mandate, which imposed a financial penalty on people who chose not to purchase health insurance. This would have been a financial relief for low- and middle-income households, who made up nearly 80% of the families paying the penalty.

Trumpcare would also have increased the availability of short-term, limited-duration health plans, which can cost up to 60% less than traditional plans. This would have given Americans more flexibility to choose plans that suit their needs.

Trumpcare would have repealed subsidies and regulations

Trumpcare, or the Affordable Care Act (ACA), did not become law. However, President Trump did implement several changes to the healthcare system during his first term, and his victory in the 2024 election suggests that big changes could be in store, especially if Republicans maintain control of the House.

The Trump administration also approved waivers from several states that imposed work requirements and administrative burdens on non-elderly adults benefiting from the ACA's Medicaid expansion. These actions reduced opportunities for enrollment in the ACA's insurance exchanges and decreased ACA enrollments, contributing to a slight uptick in the number of uninsured Americans.

In addition, the Trump administration's efforts to expand access to cheaper, lower-quality insurance that did not meet the ACA's quality standards siphoned off healthier enrollees from the exchanges, further undermining the regulatory structure of the ACA.

While Trumpcare did not become law, the actions taken by the Trump administration during his first term had significant impacts on the healthcare system, resulting in higher costs and reduced access to quality coverage for millions of American families.

Frequently asked questions