Texas Senate Bill 8, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, was passed on May 19, 2021, and went into effect on September 1, 2021. The bill prohibits physicians from performing or inducing abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, which usually occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. The act has been the subject of numerous lawsuits and has been criticised for being cynical and diabolical in its attempt to circumvent Roe v. Wade. Despite this, the bill has withstood legal challenges and remains in effect.
Characteristics | Values |
---|---|
Bill Name | Texas Heartbeat Act |
Bill Number | TX SB8 |
Bill Session | 2021-2022 |
Legislature | 87th |
Bill Sponsor | Sen. Bryan Hughes |
Bill Co-Sponsors | Sen. Paul Bettencourt, Sen. Brian Birdwell, Sen. Dawn Buckingham, Sen. Donna Campbell, Sen. Charles Creighton, Sen. Kelly Hancock, Sen. Joan Huffman, Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, Sen. Eddie Lucio, Sen. Jane Nelson, Sen. Angela Paxton, Sen. Charles Perry, Sen. Charles Schwertner, Sen. Drew Springer, Sen. Larry Taylor |
Bill Co-Sponsors | Rep. Shelby Slawson, Rep. Dustin Burrows, Rep. Stephanie Klick, Rep. Briscoe Cain, Rep. Stephen Allison, Rep. Charles Anderson, Rep. Trent Ashby, Rep. Ernest Bailes, Rep. Kyle Biedermann, Rep. Greg Bonnen, Rep. Brad Buckley, Rep. Dewayne Burns, Rep. Giovanni Capriglione, Rep. Travis Clardy, Rep. John Cyrier, Rep. Jake Ellzey, Rep. James Frank, Rep. John Frullo, Rep. Craig Goldman, Rep. Sam Harless, Rep. Cody Harris, Rep. Cole Hefner, Rep. Justin Holland, Rep. Dan Huberty, Rep. Todd Hunter, Rep. Jacey Jetton, Rep. Matt Krause, Rep. John Kuempel, Rep. Stan Lambert, Rep. Brooks Landgraf, Rep. J.M. Lozano, Rep. William Metcalf, Rep. Mayes Middleton, Rep. Andrew Murr, Rep. Candy Noble, Rep. Tom Oliverson, Rep. Chris Paddie, Rep. Jared Patterson, Rep. Dennis Paul, Rep. Glenn Rogers, Rep. Scott Sanford, Rep. Matt Schaefer, Rep. Mike Schofield, Rep. Matthew Shaheen, Rep. Bryan Slaton, Rep. Reggie Smith, Rep. David Spiller, Rep. Phil Stephenson, Rep. Lynn Stucky, Rep. Valoree Swanson, Rep. Ed Thompson, Rep. Tony Tinderholt, Rep. Gary Vandeaver, Rep. James White, Rep. Terry Wilson |
Bill Status | Passed |
Effective Date | 1st September 2021 |
Bill Summary | Prohibits a physician from performing or inducing an abortion after a "fetal heartbeat" has been detected. The law makes exceptions for medical emergencies. |
What You'll Learn
- The Texas Heartbeat Act bans abortions after the detection of a foetal heartbeat
- The law took effect on 1st September 2021
- The Act authorises members of the public to sue anyone who performs or facilitates an illegal abortion
- The Act contains exceptions in the case of a medical emergency
- The Act does not make performing or inducing an abortion a crime
The Texas Heartbeat Act bans abortions after the detection of a foetal heartbeat
Texas Senate Bill 8, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, prohibits physicians from performing or inducing abortions after a "foetal heartbeat" has been detected. The bill does not specify a stage of pregnancy after which abortions are prohibited, but a foetal heartbeat is usually detected around six weeks into a pregnancy.
The bill defines a "foetal heartbeat" as "cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the foetal heart within the gestational sac". Under the Texas Heartbeat Act, physicians must test for a foetal heartbeat before performing or inducing an abortion. If they detect one or fail to test for one, they cannot proceed with the abortion.
The Act provides an exception for medical emergencies. A physician may proceed with an abortion after detecting a foetal heartbeat if they believe a medical emergency exists. In such cases, the physician must document the emergency in both the patient's and their own medical records.
The Texas Heartbeat Act does not criminalise the performance or inducement of an abortion. Instead, it allows civil lawsuits against physicians who provide or induce abortions in violation of the law. The Act permits private citizens to sue anyone who performs or induces an abortion after the detection of a foetal heartbeat, as well as anyone who "aids and abets" such an abortion.
The Texas Heartbeat Act came into effect on September 1, 2021. Since its introduction, there have been several legal challenges to the Act, but none have been successful.
Montana's SB-333: Law or Not?
You may want to see also
The law took effect on 1st September 2021
The Texas Heartbeat Act, or Texas Senate Bill 8, took effect on 1st September 2021. The Act bans abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, which usually occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy.
The Act is enforced by private citizens, rather than government officials, who can sue anyone who performs or assists a post-heartbeat abortion for a minimum of $10,000 in statutory damages per abortion, plus court costs and attorney's fees. The Act also allows lawsuits against anyone who "aids and abets" an abortion in violation of the law.
The Act contains exceptions in the case of a medical emergency, such as if the mother is at risk of death or severe irreversible bodily harm. However, it does not make an exception for rape or incest.
The Texas Heartbeat Act is the first time a state has successfully imposed a six-week abortion ban since Roe v. Wade, and the first abortion restriction to rely solely on enforcement by private individuals. The Act has been subject to numerous lawsuits, but it has withstood each of these challenges and remains in effect.
Florida's Lawmaking: Bills to Acts
You may want to see also
The Act authorises members of the public to sue anyone who performs or facilitates an illegal abortion
The Texas Heartbeat Act, also known as Senate Bill 8 (SB 8), is a law that bans abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, which usually occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. The Act authorises members of the public to sue anyone who performs or facilitates an illegal abortion. This is a unique feature of the law, as it is the first time that a state has imposed a six-week abortion ban and the first abortion restriction to rely solely on enforcement by private individuals through civil lawsuits.
Under the Act, private citizens can sue anyone who performs or induces an abortion in violation of the law, as well as anyone who "aids and abets" an illegal abortion. This includes staff members at clinics, counsellors, lawyers, financiers, and those who provide transportation to an abortion clinic. The Act encourages private enforcement by allowing successful plaintiffs to collect statutory damages of "not less than $10,000" for each post-heartbeat abortion, in addition to court costs and attorney's fees.
The Act's enforcement mechanism has been designed to shield the law from pre-enforcement judicial review. By forbidding state officials from enforcing the law and instead authorising private individuals to sue those who perform or assist abortions, the Act makes it difficult for abortion providers to identify the proper defendants to sue. This has effectively denied abortion providers the opportunity to seek federal-court injunctions against the enforcement of the statute.
The Texas Heartbeat Act has been subject to numerous lawsuits in state and federal court, but the statute has withstood these challenges and remains in effect. Even when courts have declared the Act unconstitutional, abortion providers have remained in compliance with it because it purports to subject individuals to private civil-enforcement lawsuits if they perform or assist a post-heartbeat abortion while an injunction that blocks the law's enforcement is in effect. This has made it difficult for abortion providers to resume services even when they obtain relief from a lower court.
Understanding Lawmaking: A Cartoon Guide to the Process
You may want to see also
The Act contains exceptions in the case of a medical emergency
The Texas Heartbeat Act, also known as Senate Bill 8, prohibits physicians from performing or inducing abortions after a "fetal heartbeat" has been detected. This usually occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. However, the Act does provide exceptions in the case of a medical emergency.
If a physician believes that a medical emergency exists, they are allowed to proceed with performing an abortion even if a fetal heartbeat has been detected. The Act defines a medical emergency as a situation where the physician believes that a medical emergency exists that prevents compliance with the Act's requirements.
In such cases, the physician must make written notations in both the patient's and their own medical records. These notations must include the physician's belief that a medical emergency necessitated the abortion, as well as the specific medical condition of the pregnant woman that prevented compliance with the Act.
It is important to note that the Act does not provide a specific definition of "medical emergency." The determination of whether a medical emergency exists is left to the physician's judgment and is based on their belief that an emergency exists and compliance with the Act is not possible.
The Texas Heartbeat Act, while allowing for medical emergency exceptions, still imposes certain documentation and record-keeping requirements on physicians who perform abortions in these circumstances. These requirements ensure that the physician's belief in the existence of a medical emergency and the patient's relevant medical condition are properly documented and maintained in both the patient's and physician's records.
Understanding the Lawmaking Process: Bills to Laws
You may want to see also
The Act does not make performing or inducing an abortion a crime
Texas Senate Bill 8, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, does not make performing or inducing an abortion a crime. Instead, it allows civil lawsuits against a physician who provides or induces such an abortion. The Act allows private citizens to sue anyone who performs or induces an abortion in violation of the law. It also allows lawsuits against anyone who "aids and abets" an abortion in violation of the law.
The Act defines "fetal heartbeat" as "cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac." This usually appears around 6 weeks into a pregnancy. Under the Act, physicians must test for a "fetal heartbeat" before performing or inducing an abortion. If they detect one or fail to test for one, they cannot proceed with performing or inducing the abortion.
A physician may proceed with performing an abortion once a "fetal heartbeat" is detected only if they believe a medical emergency exists. The Act requires the physician to document the emergency in both the patient's and the physician's medical records.
Under the Act, a person has 4 years to bring a lawsuit. It specifies that these provisions apply only to abortions performed or induced after September 1, 2021.
Charles' Law: Gases Transforming into Liquids
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Texas Senate Bill 8, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, prohibits a physician from performing or inducing an abortion after a "fetal heartbeat" has been detected. The law makes exceptions for medical emergencies.
Texas Senate Bill 8 was passed on May 19, 2021, and went into effect on September 1, 2021.
Texas Senate Bill 8 prohibits physicians from performing or inducing abortions after the detection of a "fetal heartbeat", which usually occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. The law includes exceptions for medical emergencies and does not criminalize the act of performing or inducing an abortion. Instead, it allows private citizens to sue anyone who performs, induces, or "aids and abets" an abortion in violation of the law.