Community Property Laws: Retirement Plans And You

In the US, community property laws apply to retirement plans, but the specifics vary from state to state. In community property states, income and assets acquired by either spouse during a marriage are considered community property and are thus owned equally by both partners. This includes retirement plans, which are a form of deferred compensation for labour expended during the years of employment.

However, federal laws cover some pension plans and can preempt state community property laws. Additionally, each state has its own specific community property laws, and retirement plans may be treated differently depending on whether they are defined contribution plans or defined benefit plans.

For example, in California, retirement plans are considered community property, and upon divorce, each spouse is typically entitled to half of the community property portion of the defined contribution plan. In contrast, Texas allows a judge to divide assets in any way they deem equitable.

Therefore, it is important to understand the specific community property laws of the state in question when considering how they apply to retirement plans.

Retirement plans are considered community property in California

In the case of divorce, each spouse is typically entitled to half of each community property asset. However, retirement benefits and pension plans can be more complex, as they may be considered a mixed community and separate property asset. If an employee spouse continues to work after the divorce is finalised, the retirement benefits accrued during this time are considered separate property.

It is important to note that federal laws govern some pension plans, and these laws take precedence over state community property laws. Additionally, certain types of retirement plans, such as IRAs, may have specific rules regarding their division in the event of a divorce. Seeking legal advice is recommended to ensure compliance with federal and state laws and to avoid costly mistakes.

In community property states, each spouse owns half of the community property

In community property states, each spouse is considered to own a share of the marital assets, including any financial or real assets acquired during the marriage. This means that each spouse owns half of the community property.

Community property is a legal distinction that designates a married individual's assets. It refers to any income and any real or personal property acquired by either spouse during a marriage, and thus, belongs to both partners of the marriage. In these states, spouses own (and owe) everything equally, regardless of who earns or spends the income.

Retirement benefits are a form of deferred compensation for labour expended during the years of employment. These benefits, whether or not vested at the time of divorce, are community property. This means that upon divorce, each spouse is entitled to one-half of each community property asset, including retirement plans.

However, it is important to note that federal laws cover some pension plans, and these federal laws preempt state community property laws. Therefore, in cases where a federal law governs the distribution of an asset, that law controls.

Additionally, community property rights only accrue from the date of marriage until the date of separation. If a worker spouse was employed and receiving retirement benefits before the marriage, these benefits are considered separate property.

In some community property states, such as California, any gains and losses resulting from separate retirement plans are not subject to division as community property. However, it is crucial to adhere to federal and state laws when dividing retirement plans. 401Ks and pension plans, for example, are subject to federal laws, and there may be special rules regarding how these plans should be divided in a divorce.

Furthermore, each community property state has specific rules regarding the handling of assets at death. For instance, in the state of Washington, a surviving spouse will receive all of the deceased's share of the net community estate, half of the net separate assets if the deceased had children or surviving heirs, three-fourths of net separate assets if there are no surviving heirs but the deceased is survived by one or more of their parents, and all of the net separate assets if there are no surviving heirs or parents.

It is worth noting that community property laws do not apply if the spouses have different domiciles. In such cases, the interests of the spouses will be determined by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the spouses and the property.

Retirement benefits are a form of deferred compensation for labour expended during employment

In the case of divorce, retirement benefits are typically divided equally between the spouses, regardless of who earned the income. This is because, in community property states, all property acquired during the marriage is presumed to be community property. However, in some cases, a non-pro-rata division of property may be permitted, where one spouse may be entitled to keep their retirement benefits if a payment is made to compensate the other spouse for their interest in the community property.

It is important to note that community property rights only accrue from the date of marriage until the date of separation. If a spouse was receiving retirement benefits before the marriage or continued working after the separation, these benefits are considered separate property.

Furthermore, federal laws govern some pension plans and may preempt state community property laws. In such cases, federal law controls the distribution of the asset. Additionally, retirement plans such as 401(k)s and pension plans are subject to federal laws, which may include special rules for dividing these plans in the event of a divorce.

To avoid potential issues, it is recommended to obtain a qualified domestic relations order, which should clearly spell out the percentage of the account to be paid out and how the receiving spouse will be paid. Consulting with an attorney who can explain state and federal laws is also advisable to protect individuals from making costly mistakes and to identify retirement plans that qualify as community property.

Federal laws cover some pension plans and can preempt state community property laws

In the US, federal laws cover some pension plans and can preempt state community property laws. This means that in the case of a conflict between federal and state laws concerning the treatment of property, federal law will prevail. For example, in the context of retirement plans, federal law may dictate that certain types of income and liabilities are designated as the sole property of a spouse, despite state community property laws that would otherwise treat them as community property.

This was demonstrated in the case of Marriage of Peterson (243 CA4th 943), where the husband contributed to Social Security, while the wife was a member of the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) Plan and was prohibited from contributing to Social Security under federal law. The court held that federal law prevented them from considering the husband's Social Security contributions when allocating the wife's LACERA benefits, which were considered community property under state law.

Additionally, federal laws like the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) can have a significant impact on the distribution of retirement plans during divorce proceedings. While federal law protects an employee's benefits in an ERISA Qualified Plan, a court can order the transfer of an interest in such a plan to a non-participating spouse through a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO).

Furthermore, federal laws can also determine how property is taxed, while state laws establish whether and to what extent a taxpayer has "property" or "rights to property" subject to taxation. This interplay between federal and state laws requires an understanding of relevant state property laws to properly analyse community property issues.

In summary, while state community property laws play a significant role in determining the distribution of assets, including retirement plans, federal laws can sometimes supersede these laws, particularly in cases where specific types of income and liabilities are involved, or when it comes to taxation and collection matters.

In some community property states, community rules are also available for registered domestic partners

In California, Nevada, and Washington, registered domestic partners are subject to state community property laws in the same way as married couples. These laws generally provide registered domestic partners with the same legal benefits and burdens as married couples. In community property states, registered domestic partner status subjects the partners to community property rules.

According to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), registered domestic partners must each report half of the combined community income earned by the partners. In addition to half of the community income, a partner who has income that is not community income must report that separate income. The IRS treats the community income of registered domestic partners as earned one-half by each partner for federal tax purposes.

For example, if a registered domestic partner earns $100,000 and $20,000 is withheld for federal income taxes, they would report $50,000 in earnings and $10,000 in federal income tax withholdings on their tax return. The other partner would report the same figures on their separate tax return.

It is important to note that the rules for community property may vary among different community property states. Taxpayers should consult the specific laws and regulations of their state to understand how community property laws apply to registered domestic partners.

Frequently asked questions