Governments' Strategies To Stop Corporate Lawbreaking

Businesses and corporations have a long history of breaking the law, often at the expense of consumers or investors. While governments have put in place regulations to prevent this, the complex nature of corporations and their close relationship with the government means that they often escape punishment.

In the US, government regulation has expanded massively over the past century, with Congress passing the first antitrust law in 1890. This was followed by the creation of agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in 1914, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1934. These agencies enforce laws related to consumer protection, workplace safety, and fair competition.

Despite these measures, corporate crime continues to flourish. This is partly due to the complex nature of large corporations, where decision-making is often removed from the criminal act, and the high evidentiary standards required to prosecute white-collar crime. Additionally, the close relationship between government and big business, particularly in industries like finance, can result in regulatory capture, where the government is influenced by the industries they are supposed to regulate.

To address corporate crime, some have suggested increasing the use of criminal liability for individuals within corporations, while others propose leveraging new technologies like artificial intelligence to monitor financial institutions more effectively.

Financial regulations

One key method is the establishment of regulatory bodies, tasked with overseeing specific areas of the financial industry. For instance, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates initial public offerings (IPOs), enforces rules for stock trading, and ensures full disclosure. The SEC's role is vital in protecting investors from mismanagement and fraud, thereby boosting investor confidence and encouraging investment.

Another example of a regulatory body is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), created in 1914 to safeguard consumers from deceptive or anti-competitive practices, including price-fixing, monopolies, and fraudulent advertising. While some businesses view the FTC as an adversary, its role is essential in maintaining fair competition and protecting consumers from exploitative practices.

In addition to regulatory bodies, governments also utilise legislation to enforce financial regulations. In response to the 2008 financial crisis, the US government enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, introducing sweeping reforms to the financial sector. This act established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which monitors and safeguards the financial interests of American consumers.

Similarly, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, passed in 2002 following financial scandals involving major corporations, holds senior management accountable for the accuracy of their financial statements. This act also mandates the establishment of internal controls to prevent fraud and abuse, enhancing corporate accountability.

While financial regulations are essential for maintaining stability and consumer protection, there is a delicate balance to be struck. Overregulation can stifle innovation, increase costs, and hinder economic growth, while underregulation can lead to mismanagement, corruption, and financial collapse. Therefore, governments must carefully calibrate their regulatory approach to strike the right balance.

Employment and labour laws

In the United States, the Department of Labor (DOL) plays a significant role in enforcing labour laws. The DOL administers and enforces over 180 federal laws that cover the activities of approximately 165 million workers and 11 million workplaces. One of the key laws enforced by the DOL is the Fair Labour Standards Act (FLSA), which sets standards for wages and overtime pay. The FLSA ensures that employees receive at least the federal minimum wage and overtime pay of one-and-one-half times the regular rate of pay. It also includes provisions to protect children from dangerous work and restricts their working hours.

Another important aspect of employment and labour laws is workplace safety and health. The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) is administered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which sets safety and health standards for private industries and public sector employers. Employers are required to comply with OSHA's regulations and provide a workplace free from recognised serious hazards. OSHA conducts workplace inspections and investigations to enforce these standards.

Additionally, labour laws address issues such as workers' compensation, family and medical leave, discrimination, and wrongful termination. Workers' compensation laws provide benefits and medical care to employees who suffer job-related injuries or illnesses. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) allows eligible employees to take extended leave for the birth or adoption of a child, or to care for a serious illness of the employee or their family member.

To prevent companies from breaking employment and labour laws, governments enforce these regulations through inspections, investigations, and penalties for non-compliance. For example, the Wage and Hour Division of the DOL enforces labour standards, including minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. Governments also provide resources and guidance to employers to ensure they understand and comply with the laws.

In India, employment laws are a combination of Central and State laws. The Central laws regulate minimum wages, employee benefits, retrenchment, layoffs, and the hiring of contract labour. State laws, such as the Shops and Establishments Act, further expand upon or amend these provisions to protect employees. India has also proposed the codification of employment laws under four codes: the Code on Wages, the Code on Social Security, the Industrial Relations Code, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code.

Workplace anti-discrimination and harassment policies

Governments have various ways to prevent companies from breaking the law. One example is the implementation of workplace anti-discrimination and harassment policies. These policies are designed to ensure that all employees are treated with respect and dignity, and that the company promotes equal employment opportunities.

A company's anti-harassment policy should be a written set of guidelines that outline what behaviour is unacceptable in the workplace and the types of discipline that can result from inappropriate behaviour. It should also include a clear statement that the company will not tolerate any form of harassment, along with definitions and examples of prohibited behaviour, such as verbal, physical, online, and sexual harassment.

Additionally, the policy should outline the roles and responsibilities of employees and managers in preventing harassment, as well as the steps to take when reporting an incident. Companies should also provide resources for employees who have experienced harassment and explain how they can keep these reports confidential.

It is also important for companies to demonstrate their commitment to taking corrective action and preventing further harassment. This can be done by outlining disciplinary actions and stating that all incidents will be investigated promptly and thoroughly.

By implementing these anti-harassment policies, companies can create a safe and respectful work environment for their employees, while also protecting themselves from legal action.

Antitrust laws

The three core federal antitrust laws in the US are the Sherman Act (1890), the Clayton Act (1914), and the Federal Trade Commission Act (1914).

The Sherman Act

The Sherman Act outlaws "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade" and any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize". It prohibits price-fixing, the operation of cartels, and other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade.

The Clayton Act

The Clayton Act addresses specific practices that the Sherman Act does not clearly prohibit, such as mergers and interlocking directorates (when a single person makes business decisions for competing companies). It prohibits mergers and acquisitions where the effect "may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly".

The Federal Trade Commission Act

The Federal Trade Commission Act bans "unfair methods of competition" and "unfair or deceptive acts or practices". The Supreme Court has ruled that all violations of the Sherman Act also violate the FTC Act.

Enforcement

Civil antitrust enforcement occurs through lawsuits filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice, and private parties who have been harmed by an antitrust violation. Criminal antitrust enforcement is carried out by the Justice Department's Antitrust Division.

Criticisms and Debate

The scope of antitrust laws and the degree to which they should interfere in an enterprise's freedom to conduct business is strongly debated. Some economists argue that antitrust laws impede competition and may discourage businesses from pursuing socially beneficial activities. Others argue that antitrust laws are necessary to protect consumers and workers, and to control economic power in the public interest.

Environmental regulations

The EPA has the authority to monitor and enforce compliance with environmental laws and regulations, such as the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA). For example, under the CAA, companies that perform incineration, chemical manufacturing, and metal processing operations must obtain operating permits to manage and reduce their air emissions. Similarly, the CWA requires businesses that discharge wastewater to obtain permits to ensure pollution control.

In addition to federal regulations, companies must also comply with state and local environmental laws. State laws may be more stringent than federal ones, and they take precedence as long as the state assumes primary responsibility for implementation and enforcement. However, the federal government retains ultimate enforcement authority, and the EPA monitors state and tribal implementation of its approved programs.

Compliance with environmental regulations can bring several benefits to companies, including increased operational efficiency, reduced waste, and improved environmental performance. Additionally, it helps businesses avoid legal liabilities, fines, and penalties, while also enhancing their reputation among customers, investors, and other stakeholders.

Overall, environmental regulations play a vital role in protecting the environment, preserving natural resources, and ensuring sustainable development for present and future generations. By enforcing these regulations, governments can hold corporations accountable for their impact on the environment and promote eco-friendly practices.

Frequently asked questions