Pilots Breaking Laws: Unknowingly Crossing Legal Boundaries

Pilots are responsible for the safety of their passengers and crew and are therefore expected to follow a multitude of regulations and guidelines. However, there are instances where pilots unknowingly break the law. For example, in the case of drone pilots, there is a dispute over whether they are required to maintain a visual line of sight on their drone at all times. Some argue that this is not feasible, especially when looking down at the remote control or monitoring other aircraft systems. Another example is the sterile cockpit rule, which prohibits pilots from engaging in non-essential duties, activities, or conversations during critical phases of flight. However, this rule can be unknowingly broken if a pilot is simply trying to troubleshoot a problem and inadvertently neglects their primary task of flying the aircraft.

Pilots may unintentionally break the law by flying for more hours than legally allowed

In Europe, the maximum flight duty time for a pilot is typically 13 hours. However, this assumes that there are only two pilots operating the flight. If there are three or four pilots, the maximum allowable time can be extended. Additionally, the time of day a pilot starts their duty can impact the total hours they are allowed to work. For example, a pilot who starts their shift at 10 am can work more hours than one who starts at 10 pm.

The number of pilots operating a flight and the number of flights in a duty can also affect a pilot's total working hours. Short-haul flights usually have two pilots and can operate up to four flights a day, while long-haul flights may have three or four pilots and typically involve only one flight.

To prevent pilot fatigue and ensure safety, regulatory authorities such as the CAA, FAA, and EASA have implemented Flight Time Limitations (FTLs) that mandate the maximum number of hours pilots can work. These rules take into account various factors, including the number of consecutive days worked, the need for adequate rest, and the requirement for a fixed number of days off over a set period.

Despite these regulations, pilots may still unintentionally exceed their maximum duty hours due to unforeseen circumstances, such as delays or multiple early starts. In such cases, they may be breaking the law, risking their license, and facing potential criminal prosecution if any incidents occur. Therefore, it is crucial for pilots and airlines to carefully manage rostering and ensure compliance with flight time limitations.

They may also break the law by not reporting incidents to air traffic control

Pilots may unintentionally break the law by not reporting incidents to air traffic control. This can occur due to a misunderstanding of instructions or a failure to properly communicate with air traffic control.

Pilots are responsible for adhering to air traffic control (ATC) instructions and maintaining two-way radio contact with the control tower when operating within certain classes of surface areas. If a pilot fails to understand or misinterprets instructions from ATC, they may unintentionally deviate from their assigned course, altitude, or speed, which can result in a violation of regulations. In such cases, pilots should promptly advise ATC of the deviation and obtain an amended clearance to correct their flight path.

Additionally, pilots are expected to report any incidents or hazardous conditions that may impact flight safety. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the United States has established the Aviation Safety Reporting Program, which encourages pilots to voluntarily report actual or potential discrepancies and deficiencies related to aviation operations. This includes incidents such as near mid-air collisions, equipment malfunctions, or any condition that could compromise the safety of the aircraft or its occupants. By not reporting such incidents, pilots may be in violation of regulations and could face penalties or disciplinary actions.

Furthermore, pilots are required to maintain a safe operating speed and promptly report any variations to ATC. Adjustments to the cruising airspeed should be communicated to ATC if the variation is greater than 5% or 10 knots, whichever is greater. Failing to report these speed adjustments can lead to unintended consequences, especially when multiple aircraft are operating in close proximity.

It is important to note that pilots have the final authority and responsibility for the safe operation of their aircraft. While ATC provides instructions and separation between aircraft, pilots must remain vigilant and take appropriate actions to ensure the safety of their flight.

Pilots can be arrested for being intoxicated before a flight

Pilots are held to a high standard when it comes to aviation laws, and for good reason. They are responsible for the safety of their passengers, crew, and the aircraft itself. As such, they can face legal consequences for a variety of actions, including being intoxicated before a flight.

According to aviation laws, pilots are prohibited from operating an aircraft while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. This is a serious offence that can result in significant penalties, including arrest and prosecution. The consequences of intoxicated flying can be dire, as it impairs the pilot's judgement, reaction time, and coordination, posing a significant risk to everyone on board.

Even if a pilot is not visibly intoxicated, they can still be found in violation of the law if their blood alcohol content (BAC) exceeds the legal limit. This limit varies by country and airline policies, but it is generally set at a lower level for pilots than for the general public. For example, in some countries, the legal BAC limit for driving a car is set at 0.08%, while for pilots, it may be set at 0.02% or even lower.

The consequences of being found intoxicated before a flight can be severe. Pilots may face immediate arrest and prosecution, resulting in fines, jail time, and the loss of their pilot's license. Additionally, their reputation and career prospects may be damaged, as airlines have zero tolerance for such behaviour.

To ensure compliance, random alcohol and drug tests may be conducted on pilots, especially if there is reasonable suspicion of impairment. These tests are typically administered by aviation authorities or the airline itself, and refusal to submit to testing can also result in disciplinary action.

In summary, pilots have a tremendous responsibility to ensure the safety of their passengers and crew. Intoxicated flying is a violation of this trust and can lead to legal consequences, including arrest and the loss of their career. As such, pilots must adhere to strict standards and maintain their professionalism at all times.

They may also be arrested for not cooperating with airport police to arrest unruly passengers

While it is uncommon, there have been instances of pilots being arrested for breaking the law. This can include showing up to work intoxicated, which is a significant safety concern for airlines. In such cases, pilots are usually removed from duty immediately and can face legal consequences, including arrest and charges for driving under the influence (DUI).

Now, regarding pilots being arrested for not cooperating with airport police to arrest unruly passengers, here is some detailed information on that specific scenario:

Pilots, as the commanders-in-chief of their aircraft, play a crucial role in maintaining safety and order during flights. According to the Tokyo Convention, pilots have the authority to order the restraint of unruly passengers and decide whether to divert the plane to land early if a situation cannot be controlled by the flight attendants or onboard air marshals. Pilots are also responsible for reporting incidents to air traffic control, who then notify the in-airport police about an unruly passenger onboard.

In certain situations, pilots may face legal consequences if they fail to cooperate with airport police in arresting unruly passengers. While pilots have the discretion to excuse minor incidents that haven't caused harm to the aircraft or passengers, more severe cases may result in police involvement. If a pilot knowingly hinders the efforts of law enforcement to apprehend and remove an unruly passenger from the aircraft, they could be held accountable for obstructing justice or failing to comply with lawful orders. This could potentially lead to their arrest and subsequent legal proceedings.

It is important to note that the primary goal of airlines and aviation authorities is to ensure the safety of passengers and crew. Pilots are expected to cooperate with airport police to maintain a safe environment and address any disruptive behaviour effectively. While pilots have a high degree of authority and responsibility, they are still subject to legal consequences if their actions or inactions endanger others or hinder the administration of justice.

In the US, a pilot may be penalised for not having a visual line of sight of their drone

In the US, drone pilots must adhere to the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) rules for operating unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or face penalties. One such regulation is the requirement to maintain a visual line of sight with their drones. This means that the operator must see the drone with their eyes, binoculars, or a first-person view (FPV) device. This restriction limits the ability of pilots to conduct jobs that require long-distance line inspections or inaccessible terrain.

The FAA's Part 107 rule, also known as the Small UAS Rule, governs the operation of drones weighing under 55 pounds in US airspace. It stipulates that drone pilots must keep their UAVs within visual range or use a visual observer co-located with and in direct communication with them. Failure to comply with this regulation may result in FAA enforcement action, including fines or other penalties.

To operate a drone beyond the visual line of sight, pilots must obtain a Part 107 BVLOS (Beyond Visual Line of Sight) Waiver from the FAA. This waiver process is intricate and time-consuming, requiring operators to demonstrate that their proposed BVLOS operation can be conducted safely. Drone service providers must submit detailed plans, procedures, and data about their drones for FAA review. Even with a waiver, the FAA may impose additional restrictions, such as requiring a visual observer or the use of specific technologies to track the drone's location.

While some drone pilots choose to operate outside of these regulations, the FAA has the authority to enforce penalties for violations, especially if they result in accidents, endangerment, or damage. Therefore, it is essential for drone pilots to be aware of and comply with the relevant laws and regulations to avoid penalties and ensure safe drone operations.

Frequently asked questions