In the scientific community, a hypothesis, theory, and law are all explanations, but they differ in breadth. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that can be tested by further investigation. It is a proposed explanation for a narrow set of phenomena, based on prior experience, scientific background knowledge, preliminary observations, and logic. A theory, on the other hand, is a well-supported explanation of observations. It is a concise, coherent, systematic, predictive, and broadly applicable explanation for a wide range of phenomena. A scientific law is a statement that summarizes the relationship between variables. It is a rule for how nature will behave under certain conditions, frequently written as an equation.
Characteristics | Values |
---|---|
Hypothesis | A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that can be tested by further investigation. It is an educated guess or a prediction based on evidence. |
Theory | A theory is a well-supported explanation of observations. It is a powerful explanation for a wide range of phenomena. |
Scientific Law | A scientific law is a statement that summarizes the relationship between variables. It is a rule for how nature will behave under certain conditions, frequently written as an equation. |
What You'll Learn
- A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that can be tested by further investigation
- A theory is a well-supported explanation of observations
- Scientific laws are principles that can be used to predict the behaviour of the natural world
- Theories are concise, coherent, systematic, predictive, and broadly applicable
- A hypothesis is a suggested solution based on evidence
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that can be tested by further investigation
A hypothesis is very tentative and can be easily changed. It is not a fact, which is a basic statement established by experiment or observation. A hypothesis is also different from a theory, which is a well-supported explanation of observations. A theory is a powerful explanation for a wide range of phenomena and is concise, coherent, systematic, predictive, and broadly applicable. It is supported by many lines of evidence and accepted by the scientific community.
A hypothesis is also distinct from a scientific law, which is a statement that summarizes the relationship between variables. A law is a principle that can be used to predict the behavior of the natural world and is typically well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. It refers to rules for how nature will behave under certain conditions, often written as an equation.
In summary, a hypothesis is a tentative explanation that can be tested through further investigation. It is an important first step in the scientific process, as it provides a suggested solution or prediction based on evidence that can then be further examined and validated through experimentation and observation.
The Legislative Process: How a Bill Becomes Law
You may want to see also
A theory is a well-supported explanation of observations
In the scientific method, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a narrow set of phenomena. It is often referred to as an educated guess, based on evidence, that can be tested by further investigation. A theory, on the other hand, is a well-supported explanation of observations. It is a powerful, concise, coherent, systematic, and predictive explanation for a wide range of phenomena.
A theory is a scientific explanation that is well-established and supported by facts gathered over time. It is not a hunch or a guess, but a comprehensive explanation of an important feature of nature. In science, a theory is a broad explanation that is supported by many lines of evidence. It is not something that can be easily changed, and it is not a prediction, although theories can be used to make predictions.
Theories are overarching explanations that frame whole disciplines of study. They are concise, without a long list of exceptions and special rules, and they are broadly applicable. Theories often integrate and generalize many hypotheses. For example, the theory of natural selection applies to all populations with some form of inheritance, variation, and differential reproductive success.
Theories are also fact-supported and reliable accounts of the real world. For instance, the theory of biological evolution is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Theories can change, but it is a long and difficult process. A large amount of contradicting evidence must be presented for a widely accepted theory to be altered.
The Bill's Journey: Lawmaking in the US
You may want to see also
Scientific laws are principles that can be used to predict the behaviour of the natural world
Scientific laws are distinct from hypotheses and theories, although these terms are often used interchangeably in everyday life. While hypotheses are proposed explanations for a narrow set of phenomena, and theories are broad explanations for a wide range of phenomena, scientific laws are principles that can be used to predict the behaviour of the natural world.
A scientific law is a single statement that the universe obeys, whether in physics, chemistry, biology, or other fields of science, that has been experimentally proven to be true in a wide variety of situations and systems. For example, the law of conservation of energy is a single rule stating that the total energy of a closed, local system is always constant over time. It has been proven by a large body of evidence and is true in a wide variety of situations, including chemical reactions, nuclear reactions, mechanical machines, and biological processes.
Scientific laws are similar to scientific theories in that they are well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However, they differ in that scientific laws refer to rules for how nature will behave under certain conditions, often written as an equation, while scientific theories are more overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics. In other words, theories explain why we observe what we do, and laws describe what happens.
For example, around the year 1800, scientists found that certain patterns existed in the behaviour of gases: if the temperature of a gas is increased, the volume of the gas also increases. This is known as a natural law. A law is a relationship that exists between variables in a group of data, and it describes the patterns we see in large amounts of data, but it does not describe why these patterns exist.
The Journey of a Bill to Law Explained
You may want to see also
Theories are concise, coherent, systematic, predictive, and broadly applicable
Theories are broad explanations for a wide range of phenomena. They are concise, meaning they generally don't have a long list of exceptions and special rules. They are coherent, systematic, and predictive, and they are broadly applicable. Theories often integrate and generalize many hypotheses. For example, the theory of natural selection applies to all populations with some form of inheritance, variation, and differential reproductive success. This theory helps us understand a wide range of observations, such as the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the physical match between pollinators and their preferred flowers. It also allows us to make predictions, such as the expectation that treating AIDS patients with a cocktail of medications should slow the evolution of the virus.
Theories are not guesses or hunches. They are powerful explanations for a wide range of phenomena and are supported by many lines of evidence. To be accepted by the scientific community, a theory must be strongly supported by multiple lines of evidence. For example, biological evolution is a theory that is well-supported, widely accepted, and explains the diversity of life on Earth. It is not "just" a theory but a powerful and widely accepted explanation.
Theories are also self-consistent frameworks that unite laws, principles, concepts, and facts. They are able to accurately describe every aspect of a system or field of study. For example, Einstein's theory of general relativity accurately describes all aspects of gravity, space, and time, everywhere in the universe.
Understanding the Legislative Process: Bill to Law
You may want to see also
A hypothesis is a suggested solution based on evidence
A hypothesis is not a guess or a hunch. It is a reasoned and informed explanation, formulated based on prior experience, scientific background knowledge, preliminary observations, and logic. For example, scientists observed that alpine butterflies exhibit characteristics intermediate between two species that live at lower elevations. Based on these observations and their understanding of speciation, they hypothesized that this species of alpine butterfly evolved as a result of hybridization between the two other species living at lower elevations.
A good hypothesis has a reasonable likelihood of being true and leading to interesting results. It should also bring about a significant advance in our knowledge. For instance, the statement "there is a supermassive black hole at the centre of our galaxy" was a good hypothesis because it was testable, reasonably likely to be true based on previous observations, and would lead to groundbreaking results if proven true.
Once a hypothesis is tested and supported by evidence, it can become a theory. A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Theories are concise, coherent, systematic, predictive, and broadly applicable. They are not just hunches or speculations but carry a lot of weight in the scientific community.
Scientific laws are similar to scientific theories in that they are principles that can be used to predict the behaviour of the natural world. They refer to rules for how nature will behave under certain conditions, often written as an equation. For example, the law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of a closed, local system remains constant over time.
It is important to note that hypotheses cannot become theories, and theories cannot become laws. They differ in breadth, not in the level of support. A hypothesis will always remain a hypothesis, and a law will always remain a law.
Becoming a Law Librarian: Education, Skills, and Career Path
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
A scientific hypothesis is a suggested solution based on evidence, often referred to as an educated guess. It is a tentative explanation that can be tested by further investigation.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a narrow set of phenomena, while a theory is a broad explanation that applies to a wider range of phenomena. Theories are well-supported by evidence and are not easily changed.
A scientific law is a single statement that the universe obeys and has been proven true through experimentation and observation in a wide variety of situations. It describes the patterns we see in large amounts of data and can be written as an equation.
No, a hypothesis cannot become a law. Hypotheses, theories, and laws are all scientific explanations but they differ in breadth, not in the level of support. A hypothesis remains a hypothesis, and a law will always be a law.