Voting On Abortion: How Often Do Laws Change?

Abortion laws are a highly debated topic in the United States, with a significant focus on the issue during election seasons. The frequency of voting on abortion laws varies across states, with some states voting on these laws more frequently than others. Since the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision in 2022, which overturned Roe v. Wade, several states have voted on constitutional amendments regarding abortion access. In the 2024 election, 10 states will have abortion measures on their ballots, allowing citizens to decide on the protection or restriction of abortion rights. This number breaks the previous record of six states in 2022 with abortion-related ballot measures. The voting methods for these measures can differ, with citizen-led initiatives and legislative referrals being the two main routes to placing a measure on the ballot. Public opinion polls indicate that a majority of Americans support abortion rights, with fluctuations in support based on religious affiliation, political party identification, and other demographic factors.

The impact of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022

The impact of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022 was far-reaching and had significant consequences for women's health and reproductive rights in the United States. Here are some key impacts of the decision:

• Loss of Federal Protection for Abortion Rights: The Supreme Court's ruling meant that the constitutional right to abortion, which had been guaranteed for nearly 50 years, was revoked. This resulted in a patchwork of varying abortion laws across different states, with some states banning or severely restricting abortion access.
• State-by-State Legal Battles: With the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the authority to set abortion policies was returned to the states. This led to a wave of legal challenges as states grappled with defining the legality of abortion within their borders.
• Impact on Women's Health: The loss of Roe v. Wade had a profound impact on women's health, particularly midlife women. It limited their access to safe and legal abortions, potentially forcing them to continue with unintended pregnancies or seek unsafe alternatives. This could lead to increased health risks and negative mental health consequences.
• Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Communities: The decision disproportionately affected marginalized communities, including people of color, people with low incomes, young people, and LGBTQ+ communities. These groups often faced greater barriers to accessing healthcare and reproductive services, exacerbating existing inequalities.
• Political and Social Divide: The overturning of Roe v. Wade deepened the political divide between Republicans and Democrats, with sharp divisions in their views on abortion rights. It also sparked widespread protests and energized voters, particularly young women, to prioritize reproductive rights in elections.
• Shifting Political Landscape: In the aftermath of the decision, there was a notable shift in political attitudes towards abortion rights. A significant number of Republicans, including in some states where they may approach a majority, indicated their support for abortion rights, marking a departure from traditional party positions.
• Legal Challenges and Ballot Measures: Several states introduced constitutional amendments related to abortion, with voters in some states approving measures to protect abortion rights. These ballot measures became a key focus of political campaigns and contributed to the ongoing debate around abortion access.

The role of citizen-led initiatives in getting abortion on the ballot

Citizen-led initiatives have played a crucial role in getting abortion on the ballot in several US states. In the wake of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, citizens in several states have mobilized to place abortion-related measures on the ballot for the 2024 election. This process, known as a citizen initiative, allows citizens to bypass the legislature and governor and directly place measures on the ballot through signature collection.

In states like California, Michigan, Ohio, and Vermont, citizens successfully gathered enough signatures to place measures on the ballot that amended the state constitution to protect the right to abortion. These citizen-initiated measures have been incredibly effective, with voters approving abortion-protective measures in all six states that have had them on the ballot since the Dobbs decision. This demonstrates the power of citizen-led initiatives in shaping abortion policy at the state level.

However, it is important to note that not all states allow for citizen-initiated measures. In 15 states with abortion bans or early gestational limits, citizens do not have a pathway to place potential constitutional amendments on the ballot. In these states, the legislature maintains control over the process, and citizens must rely on lawmakers to introduce and approve measures before they can appear on the ballot.

Despite this limitation, citizen-led initiatives have been a driving force in getting abortion on the ballot in many states. For example, in Michigan and Ohio, citizens successfully passed citizen-initiated constitutional measures protecting the right to abortion in 2022 and 2023, respectively. This has set a precedent and inspired similar efforts in other states.

Advocates on both sides of the abortion debate recognize the impact of citizen-led initiatives and are working to qualify ballot initiatives in several states for the 2024 election. Abortion rights groups are seeking to uphold abortion rights in states without early gestational limits and in states with abortion bans or restrictions. Meanwhile, anti-abortion advocates are also utilizing citizen-initiated statutes to propose laws banning abortion in certain states.

How abortion laws vary by state

The legality of abortion in the United States varies significantly depending on the laws of each state. While some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy, others permit it up to a certain point, and some allow abortion throughout.

Abortion is completely illegal in 13 states, with few exceptions. These include Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wyoming. In these states, abortion is only permitted if the pregnant person's life is at risk, and some also allow exceptions for fatal fetal abnormalities, rape, or incest.

Some states permit abortion up to a certain point in the pregnancy. Arizona, for example, allows abortion up to 15 weeks, while Florida bans it after six weeks, with exceptions for rape, incest, human trafficking, and fetal abnormalities. North Carolina permits abortion up to 12 weeks, and South Dakota up to 22 weeks.

On the other hand, some states allow abortion throughout the entire pregnancy. These include Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia. However, some of these states have restrictions, such as parental consent for minors or mandatory counselling and waiting periods.

Since the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade, voters in several states have weighed in on constitutional amendments regarding abortion. In California, Michigan, Ohio, and Vermont, measures amending the state constitution to protect abortion rights were approved. Meanwhile, Kentucky and Kansas sought to curtail abortion rights, but these measures failed.

The impact of abortion laws on women voters

For many women, the issue of abortion is deeply personal and intertwined with their fundamental rights to autonomy, privacy, and health. As such, the passage of restrictive abortion laws has had a significant impact on their lives, both directly and indirectly. On a direct level, women's access to safe and legal abortions has been curtailed, with some states imposing near-total bans on the procedure. This has forced many women to travel long distances to access abortion services or seek alternative, potentially unsafe methods. Additionally, the threat of criminalisation and legal repercussions has created a climate of fear and uncertainty for women who need abortions, as well as for medical professionals who provide these services.

The indirect impact of abortion laws on women voters is also significant. The issue of abortion has emerged as a pivotal factor in electoral politics, with many voters citing it as a key consideration when deciding whom to support. This is particularly true for women, who have been galvanised by the threat to their reproductive rights. Surveys and polls have consistently shown that a significant proportion of women voters, especially those under 30, identify abortion as the most important issue influencing their vote. This shift in priorities has had tangible effects on electoral outcomes, with candidates who support abortion rights gaining increased support, particularly among young women.

Furthermore, the impact of abortion laws on women voters cannot be disentangled from the broader context of other social and economic issues. For instance, while abortion may be a key concern for women voters, it often intersects with concerns about healthcare, economic stability, and racial justice. The interplay of these issues can shape women's voting behaviours and priorities, particularly for women of colour, who may face additional barriers and challenges when accessing reproductive healthcare. As such, the impact of abortion laws on women voters is multifaceted and deeply intertwined with broader societal dynamics and power structures.

In conclusion, the impact of abortion laws on women voters is profound and far-reaching. It affects not only their access to reproductive healthcare but also their engagement with the political process, their trust in democratic institutions, and their broader struggle for equality and justice. As the debate around abortion continues to evolve, the voices and experiences of women voters will remain central to shaping policy, influencing elections, and driving social change.

The views of the two major parties on abortion

The Democratic Party supports access to "safe and legal abortion", and the majority of Democrats say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. A notable shift in the party's stance on abortion has been observed since 2016, with 80% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents saying abortion should be legal in all or most cases in 2022, up from 72% in 2016 and 63% in 2007.

While Democrats largely support a woman's right to choose, there are nuances to their views. A significant number of Democrats favour restrictions on abortion under certain circumstances, and many believe that the length of a pregnancy should be a determining factor in the legality of abortion. For instance, at the six-week mark of a pregnancy, 61% of Democrats say abortion should be legal, while 10% say it should be illegal and 14% say it depends. At 24 weeks of pregnancy, 34% say abortion should be legal, 29% say illegal, and 21% say it depends.

Democrats' attitudes towards abortion also vary depending on the circumstances surrounding the pregnancy. An overwhelming majority of Democrats believe abortion should be legal if the pregnancy threatens the woman's life or health (84%) or if it is the result of rape (83%). A slightly smaller majority supports abortion if the baby is likely to be born with severe disabilities or health issues (68%).

The Republican Party, on the other hand, takes a more conservative stance on abortion. The party platform states that "the unborn child has a fundamental right to life which cannot be infringed". However, Republican views on abortion are not monolithic, and a significant number of Republicans support legal abortion. Among Republicans who say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, a large majority (78%) identify as conservative. In contrast, Republicans who support legal abortion are more likely to describe themselves as moderate or liberal (53%).

Geography also plays a role in Republican views on abortion. Republicans who oppose legal abortion are more likely to live in the South, while those who support it are more likely to reside in the Northeast and West, regions with higher levels of support for abortion rights. Religious beliefs are another factor influencing Republican opinions on abortion. Republicans who oppose abortion are more likely to be highly religious and identify as Protestant, particularly White evangelical Protestants. On the other hand, Republicans who support legal abortion are less religious, with a significant number being religiously unaffiliated.

While the majority of Republicans favour making abortion illegal, they are not unanimously opposed to exceptions. Majorities support allowing abortion if the woman's life is at risk or in cases of rape. However, Republicans are more divided when it comes to abortion in cases where the baby is likely to be born with severe disabilities or health issues.

The views of the Democratic and Republican parties on abortion reflect the broader ideological divide in American politics. While Democrats tend to emphasise a woman's right to choose and reproductive freedom, Republicans often frame the issue as a matter of protecting the unborn child's right to life. These differing perspectives shape the policy positions and legislative agendas of the two parties, influencing how they approach abortion-related legislation and shaping the political landscape surrounding this contentious issue.

Frequently asked questions