Renvoi Choice Of Law: Application Techniques For Legal Professionals

Renvoi is a French term meaning send back or return unopened. It is a subset of the choice of law rules and is applied when a court is directed to consider the laws of another province or a foreign jurisdiction. The doctrine is considered difficult and its results are sometimes unpredictable, so its application has generally been limited to specific areas of law. The procedure for conflict cases is as follows: the court must first decide whether it has the jurisdiction to hear the case, then it must analyse the case and allocate each component to its appropriate legal classification, and finally, it will apply the choice of law rules. There are two types of renvoi: single and double. Single renvoi refers to when a forum refers to a foreign law's choice of law rules, while double renvoi refers to when a forum court attempts to resolve an issue by closely replicating how a foreign court would operate.

Renvoi and the validity of wills and intestate succession

Renvoi, a French term meaning "send back" or "return unopened", is a legal doctrine that applies to conflict of laws cases. It comes into play when a court is directed to consider the laws of another jurisdiction. Renvoi is particularly relevant in cases involving the validity of wills and intestate succession, which is the transfer of real property upon the death of an individual without a will.

In the context of wills and intestate succession, renvoi can be applied when there is a conflict between the laws of two jurisdictions. For example, consider a scenario where an individual with assets in multiple countries dies, and there is a dispute over which country's laws should govern the distribution of those assets. The court in one country may refer to the laws of the other country to resolve the conflict.

The application of renvoi in these cases can be complex and unpredictable. There are two types of renvoi: single renvoi and double renvoi. In single renvoi, the court applies the choice-of-law rules of the foreign jurisdiction, which may result in the issue being referred back to the original court (remission). In double renvoi, the court attempts to resolve the issue by closely replicating how the foreign court would handle it, reducing the possibility of remissions and courts deciding on the same issue twice.

The use of renvoi in cases involving the validity of wills and intestate succession aims to ensure consistency and avoid forum shopping, where litigants try to manipulate the judicial system by choosing the most favourable jurisdiction. By applying renvoi, courts can achieve uniform outcomes regardless of where the case is litigated. However, the doctrine is not without its challenges, as it can lead to complications and uncertainties, especially when multiple jurisdictions are involved.

Renvoi and retrospective legitimation by marriage of natural parents

Renvoi, a French term meaning "send back" or "return unopened", is a subset of choice-of-law rules. It is applied when a court is directed to consider the laws of another state or foreign jurisdiction. The doctrine is considered difficult and unpredictable, and its application has been limited to specific areas, including retrospective legitimation by the marriage of natural parents.

Retrospective legitimation by the marriage of natural parents refers to the legal recognition of a child's status as legitimate when their parents marry after the child's birth. This concept is relevant in the context of renvoi as it involves the application of choice-of-law rules and can lead to conflicts between different legal systems.

When dealing with retrospective legitimation, the court must first establish its jurisdiction to hear the case and address any concerns regarding forum shopping. The court then proceeds to analyse the case, allocating each component to the appropriate legal classification, which is crucial for determining the applicable choice-of-law rules.

In the context of renvoi, the court must decide whether to apply only the substantive provisions of the foreign law or the entire legal system, including its choice-of-law rules. This decision can have a significant impact on the outcome of the case.

The application of renvoi in retrospective legitimation cases aims to ensure uniformity and equity in conflict-of-laws decisions. However, it is important to note that the doctrine has faced criticism due to its complexity and potential for unpredictable outcomes.

In summary, renvoi is a legal concept that can be applied in cases involving retrospective legitimation by the marriage of natural parents. The procedure involves determining jurisdiction, characterisation, and the application of choice-of-law rules, potentially including those of the foreign jurisdiction. The use of renvoi in these cases aims to achieve consistent outcomes and reduce the impact of forum shopping.

Renvoi and the capacity to marry

Renvoi, a French term meaning "send back" or "return unopened", is a subset of choice-of-law rules. It is applied when a court is directed to consider the laws of another state or foreign jurisdiction. The doctrine is considered difficult and unpredictable, and its application has been limited to specific areas of law.

There are indications that renvoi might be applied to two issues in family law: the capacity to marry and the formal validity of marriage. When considering the capacity to marry, a court must determine the applicable law, which may involve applying the conflict-of-law rules of the relevant jurisdiction. For example, an English forum dealing with the capacity to marry of a French national domiciled in Italy would refer to Italian domiciliary law. An Italian court handling the same case would refer to French national law. If the laws of the two countries differ on the specific capacity in question, the outcomes will vary.

The application of renvoi in such cases can lead to forum shopping, where plaintiffs attempt to manipulate the judicial system by choosing the most favourable jurisdiction for their case. To prevent this, some jurisdictions have adopted single or double renvoi systems. In a single renvoi system, the forum court refers to the choice-of-law rules of the foreign law, and if those rules send the matter back to the forum court, it will apply its internal laws. On the other hand, double renvoi involves the forum court deciding the matter as if it were a foreign court, reducing the possibility of remissions and courts deciding on the same issue multiple times.

The use of renvoi in family law, specifically regarding the capacity to marry, aims to achieve uniformity and equity in conflict-of-law decisions. However, it also presents challenges, such as the need to consider multiple legal systems and the potential for circular references between sets of laws.

Renvoi and the formal validity of marriage

Renvoi, a French term meaning "send back" or "return unopened", is a subset of choice-of-law rules. It is applied when a court is directed to consider the laws of another state or foreign jurisdiction. In the context of family law, renvoi may be relevant to the formal validity of marriage.

The formal validity of a marriage refers to the legal requirements that must be met for a marriage to be recognised. This includes issues such as the capacity to marry, which may be influenced by factors such as age, mental capacity, and consent. Renvoi comes into play when there is a conflict of laws between two jurisdictions, such as when a couple gets married in one country but resides in another, or when there are multiple nationalities involved.

When applying renvoi to the formal validity of marriage, a court must first determine whether it has the jurisdiction to hear the case. This involves considering whether the plaintiff is attempting to manipulate the judicial system by forum shopping, or choosing a court that is more favourable to their case. The court will then analyse the case and allocate each component to its appropriate legal classification, which will have specific choice-of-law rules attached.

In the context of marriage, the choice-of-law rules may include the laws of the country where the marriage took place, the country where the couple resides, or the countries of their nationalities. If a renvoi provision is applied, the court must consider the choice-of-law rules of the relevant jurisdictions and determine whether these rules refer only to the substantive provisions or the entire legal system, including its choice-of-law rules. This can lead to a single renvoi or double renvoi system.

A single renvoi system refers to when a forum court accepts the remission and applies its own laws to the case. For example, if an English forum refers to French law, which has a single renvoi system, English law will be applied as the first and final remission. On the other hand, a double renvoi system involves the forum court attempting to resolve the issue by replicating how a foreign court would handle the case. This reduces the possibility of remissions and courts deciding on the same issue multiple times.

While the application of renvoi to the formal validity of marriage is not widespread, there are indications that some states may consider it. However, it is important to note that renvoi is generally considered a complex doctrine with unpredictable outcomes, which has led to its limited application in legal systems worldwide.

Renvoi and the choice of law rules

Renvoi, from the French "to send back", is a subset of the choice of law rules. It is applied when a court is directed to consider the laws of another province or a foreign jurisdiction. The court must decide whether to apply only the intended law of the jurisdiction or the jurisdiction's entire law, including its choice of law rules.

The choice of law rules are applied in three steps. First, the court must decide whether it has the jurisdiction to hear the case. Second, the court must analyse the case and allocate each component to its appropriate legal classification, each of which will have one or more choice of law rules attached to it. Finally, the court will apply the choice of law rules.

The system of renvoi is an attempt to limit the damage that would result from forum shopping by ensuring that the same law is applied to achieve the same result no matter where the case is litigated. If a forum court is directed to consult a foreign law, it must first address whether this is a reference solely to the relevant substantive provisions or to the state's system of law as a whole. Forums that do not have renvoi provisions refer only to the specific provisions of relevant law.

There are two types of renvoi: single and double. Single renvoi occurs when a forum refers to a foreign law's choice of law rules. If these rules would send the matter back to the original forum, the forum court will accept it as a remission and apply its internal laws. Double renvoi, on the other hand, is when a forum court attempts to resolve an issue by closely replicating how a foreign court would operate to avoid remissions and courts deciding on the same issue twice.

The doctrine of renvoi is considered difficult and its results are sometimes unpredictable, so its application has generally been limited to specific areas of law, such as the validity of wills and intestate succession, and retrospective legitimation by the marriage of natural parents.

Frequently asked questions