Abortion Legality: Law, Court, And Complexities

Abortion laws vary widely among countries and territories, and have changed over time. In some countries, abortion is freely available on request, while others have regulations or restrictions of various kinds, or even outright prohibition in all circumstances. In some countries, abortion is only allowed under certain circumstances, such as when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, or when there is a risk to the mother's health or life. In recent years, there has been an overwhelming trend towards the liberalization of abortion laws, with more than 60 countries and territories liberalizing their laws in the past 30 years. However, the recent overturning of Roe v. Wade in the United States has resulted in abortion access and laws varying by state, with some states banning abortion altogether.

Abortion laws and their history

Abortion laws have a long and complex history, with many countries and states having different stances on the issue. In the United States, abortion was a common practice and was not always a public controversy. Leaders didn't outlaw abortion until the mid-1800s, and before that, it was a regular part of life for women. Common law allowed abortion prior to "quickening", which is an archaic term for fetal movement that usually happens after around four months of pregnancy. Reproductive care, including abortion, was unregulated and provided by skilled midwives, nurses, and other unlicensed women's healthcare providers.

The first state statute legislating abortion in the United States was passed in Connecticut in 1821; it forbade the use of poisons in abortion. After the 1840s, there was an upsurge in abortions, and by 1900, every state had anti-abortion laws in place. The press played a key role in rallying support for these laws. However, these laws were often ambiguous and difficult to enforce, and many women continued to seek out illegal underground abortion services.

The 1960s saw the rise of abortion law reform, with 11 states liberalizing their abortion laws. This was driven in part by a growing feminist movement that argued women could not be full citizens without control over their reproduction. Finally, in 1973, the Supreme Court established the legal right to access abortion nationwide with its landmark decision in the Roe v. Wade case. This decision ruled that the Constitution of the United States generally protected the right to have an abortion and struck down many abortion laws. However, this decision also sparked ongoing debates about the legality and extent of abortion, and the role of moral and religious views in politics.

Since then, abortion laws have continued to evolve, with some states and countries liberalizing their laws while others restrict access. The road to law reform is long and difficult, and advocates for abortion rights must navigate complex political, legal, and socio-cultural realities. Ultimately, the aim is to achieve the right to safe abortion and ensure that everyone with an unwanted pregnancy who seeks an abortion can have it.

The impact of Roe v. Wade being overturned

The overturning of Roe v. Wade has had a significant impact on abortion access and reproductive rights in the United States. Here are some key consequences of this decision:

• Impact on Women's Health: Midlife women, defined as those between 40 and 65 years old, face a higher risk of unintended pregnancies, which can have serious health consequences. The loss of Roe v. Wade limits their access to safe and legal abortions, potentially leading to unsafe procedures or forced pregnancies. This is especially true for women with chronic health conditions or a history of cancer, who may face higher health risks during pregnancy.
• Restricted Access and Increased Challenges: The decision to overturn Roe v. Wade has resulted in a patchwork of abortion laws across the country, with some states banning abortion entirely while others have protective laws in place. Women seeking abortions now face varying levels of access and legal restrictions depending on their state of residence. Those in states with restrictive laws may need to travel to other states for abortion services, creating financial and logistical barriers, particularly for poor women and women of color.
• Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Communities: The loss of Roe v. Wade disproportionately affects marginalized communities, including Black, Brown, and other people of color, people with low incomes, LGBTQ+ communities, immigrants, and people with disabilities. These communities often have more limited access to healthcare and face additional barriers to obtaining abortions, such as transportation challenges and a lack of financial resources.
• Impact on Caregiving Roles: The overturning of Roe v. Wade has significant implications for midlife women who are caregivers to children, spouses, or other relatives. These women may face difficulties accessing reproductive healthcare and abortion services due to their caregiving responsibilities and financial constraints, further exacerbating the challenges they face.
• Healthcare Education and Quality of Care: The loss of Roe v. Wade will have repercussions for medical and nursing education. Future physicians and nurses may not receive adequate training in abortion care and the management of pregnancy complications, potentially impacting the quality of reproductive healthcare in the long run.
• State-by-State Variability: Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, reproductive rights are now decided at the state level. Some states have interpreted their constitutions to strongly protect abortion access, while others have made abortion illegal. This has created a fragmented landscape of abortion laws across the country, with varying levels of access and restrictions for women seeking abortions.

Abortion rights as human rights

Abortion rights are human rights. Access to safe and legal abortion is essential to protecting autonomy and reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. Restrictive abortion laws violate several human rights, including the right to life, health, information, privacy, and bodily autonomy and integrity.

The criminalisation of abortion and the existence of unsafe abortion procedures are significant barriers to accessing abortion. Criminalisation leads to unsafe and clandestine abortions, particularly for marginalised communities who face additional social, economic, and political barriers. This results in higher rates of maternal mortality and morbidity, with young people and marginalised groups bearing the brunt of these consequences.

International human rights law and jurisprudence support the conclusion that decisions about abortion belong solely to the pregnant person, without interference from the state or third parties. The right to abortion is connected to various rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, such as the right to non-discrimination and freedom from torture.

The decriminalisation of abortion involves removing criminal sanctions and ensuring that abortion is treated like any other form of healthcare. Several countries, such as Canada and Cuba, have effectively decriminalised abortion, providing valuable models for law reform in other nations.

Advocates for abortion law reform must carefully consider their goals and strategies, building a critical mass of support from various allies, including parliamentarians, health professionals, and women's groups, to bring about meaningful and long-lasting change.

The process of changing abortion laws

Changing abortion laws is a long and difficult process. Advocates must study the political, health system, legal, juridical, and socio-cultural realities surrounding existing law and policy in their country. They must also decide what kind of law they want, if any, and what is possible to achieve. This involves building a critical mass of support from allies, including parliamentarians, health professionals, legal experts, women's groups, human rights groups, family planning supporters, and women themselves.

Once advocates have decided on their desired outcome, they must campaign for it with confidence that it can be implemented. This process can take years, and advocates may not get many chances to change the law.

In terms of the specific steps to change abortion laws, these will vary depending on the country and its system of government. In general, however, changing abortion laws will involve engaging with and lobbying politicians and lawmakers to introduce and pass new legislation or amend existing laws. This may involve proposing and drafting new bills, as well as building support for these bills among lawmakers and the general public. In some countries, changing abortion laws may also involve engaging with the executive branch of government, which may have the power to propose or veto legislation.

In addition to changing laws, advocates may also need to work on implementing regulations and guidelines to ensure that abortion services are accessible and affordable. This may involve working with health ministries and service providers to develop and implement standards and protocols for abortion care. It may also involve advocacy and awareness-raising to ensure that women know about their rights and where to access services.

Finally, changing abortion laws may also involve engaging with the judicial system, particularly if there are legal challenges to new or amended laws. This may involve strategizing and coordinating legal challenges to existing laws, as well as defending new laws from such challenges.

The consequences of restrictive abortion laws

Restrictive abortion laws have severe consequences for those seeking abortions, and they cause enormous harm. Here are some of the key consequences:

Health Risks and Fatalities

Unsafe abortions are the third leading cause of preventable maternal deaths worldwide, with around 39,000 deaths per year from unsafe abortions. In addition, unsafe abortions can lead to physical and mental health complications, including incomplete abortions, haemorrhage, uterine perforation, and damage to the genital tract and internal organs. The World Health Organization estimates that 23,000 women die from unsafe abortions each year, and many more experience significant health complications.

Loss of Educational and Economic Opportunities

Restrictive abortion laws can impact the educational and economic opportunities of those seeking abortions, particularly women and girls. When people are denied access to safe and legal abortions, they may be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, which can disrupt their education and careers. This can have long-term consequences for their economic well-being and social mobility.

Deepening of Historical Marginalization

Restrictive abortion laws can disproportionately affect those from historically marginalized communities, including low-income individuals, refugees, migrants, LGBTIQ+ people, and racialized and Indigenous people. These communities often face additional barriers to accessing healthcare, making it more difficult for them to obtain safe abortions.

Violation of Human Rights

The denial of abortion care is considered a violation of human rights, including the right to life, health, privacy, bodily autonomy, and freedom from cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. Restrictive abortion laws can also violate the right to non-discrimination, as they disproportionately impact women and marginalized communities.

Financial Burdens

Restrictive abortion laws can impose financial burdens on individuals seeking abortions, especially those who have to travel to another state or country to access legal abortion services. The costs of travel, accommodation, and the procedure itself can be significant, and may be out of reach for many, leading to further health risks and complications.

Stigma and Criminalization

Restrictive abortion laws contribute to the stigma surrounding abortion and can lead to the criminalization of those seeking or providing abortions. This can create a "chilling effect," deterring healthcare providers from offering abortion services and preventing individuals from seeking post-abortion care for fear of legal consequences.

Frequently asked questions