Feeding The Homeless: Is It Illegal?

Across the United States, there are laws in place that prohibit people from feeding the homeless. In some cities, such as El Cajon, California, people have been charged with misdemeanours for giving food to the homeless in public spaces. These laws are often justified by lawmakers on the basis of health and safety, for example, to prevent the spread of Hepatitis A. However, critics argue that these laws are discriminatory and effectively criminalise homelessness. While the legality of feeding the homeless varies from place to place, these laws generally impose time and place restrictions that make it very difficult for people to distribute food to those in need.

Food-sharing restrictions in the US

Food-sharing restrictions are becoming increasingly common in the US. Between 2013 and 2015, over 26 cities and communities implemented laws restricting the distribution of food to the homeless, and the number is growing every year. These laws are often justified on the grounds of public health and safety, but critics argue that they are an attempt to hide or remove homeless people from downtown and tourist areas.

The laws vary from place to place but generally involve time and place restrictions that effectively ban food-sharing altogether, or they treat people giving out food as if they were restaurants, requiring them to meet food safety standards that are impossible to meet in the conditions in which food is distributed. In some places, it is illegal to give out prepared meals, but people are allowed to distribute ingredients. In other places, it is only illegal to distribute food in public spaces.

The laws are often controversial and face opposition from homeless advocates and charities. Critics argue that these laws do nothing to address the underlying causes of hunger and homelessness but instead exacerbate the problem by deterring people from distributing food. They also argue that these laws are unconstitutional and infringe on the right to free speech and freedom of assembly.

Some people who have provided food for the homeless despite these restrictions have faced penalties, including jail time. However, there have also been successful legal challenges to some of these laws. For example, in 2018, a federal judge ruled that feeding the homeless is a First Amendment issue and cannot be made illegal.

Hepatitis A outbreaks in homeless populations

Hepatitis A is a highly contagious liver infection caused by the hepatitis A virus (HAV). The infection ranges in severity from mild, lasting a few weeks, to severe, lasting several months. Symptoms include jaundice, dark urine, fever, abdominal pain, nausea, and fatigue. The virus is primarily spread through the faecal-oral transmission route.

Hepatitis A outbreaks have been recorded among homeless populations in the United States. Between 2013 and 2015, 26 cities passed food-sharing bans, citing the potential spread of Hepatitis A as a reason. However, homeless advocates argue that these bans are a trend towards criminalising homelessness.

In 2017, Hepatitis A outbreaks in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Santa Cruz killed about 20 homeless people. The outbreak in Utah was linked to homeless people who had moved to the city from San Diego.

The National Coalition for the Homeless Interim Director, Megan Hustings, stated that there are no documented cases of food poisoning resulting from food shared with hungry people in public places.

Food safety and health concerns

Food safety regulations and permit requirements can make it difficult or impossible for individuals and organizations to distribute food to homeless people. For example, some laws treat individuals and organizations distributing food as if they were restaurants, requiring them to meet the same food safety standards. These standards can be impossible to meet in the conditions under which food is typically distributed to homeless people. As a result, some cities have effectively banned food distribution to homeless people, as individuals and organizations are unable to comply with the regulations.

In addition to concerns about food safety, there are also worries about food allergies. Critics argue that receiving food from strangers can be dangerous if the recipient is unaware of the ingredients or if the food has been contaminated. However, others argue that the risk of food allergies is outweighed by the need for food, and that food distributed by individuals and organizations is likely to be safer than food obtained from other sources, such as garbage cans.

To address food safety and health concerns, some cities have opened resource centers or soup kitchens that provide food to homeless people. These facilities are typically required to comply with food safety regulations and may be subject to inspections to ensure that they are maintaining proper standards. However, these facilities may not be easily accessible to all homeless people, and there may not be enough of them to meet the demand for food assistance.

Overall, the issue of food safety and health concerns related to feeding homeless people is complex and multifaceted. While there are legitimate concerns about the potential for foodborne illnesses and allergies, there are also arguments that these concerns are used as a pretext for discriminating against and criminalizing homelessness. Finding a balance between ensuring food safety and meeting the needs of vulnerable populations like the homeless can be challenging, and there are a variety of approaches that cities and organizations have taken to address this issue.

Criminalising homelessness

The criminalization of homelessness refers to measures that prohibit life-sustaining activities such as sleeping, camping, eating, sitting, and asking for money or resources in public spaces. These ordinances include criminal penalties for violations of these acts.

In the United States, the criminalization of homelessness has been further enabled by the Supreme Court's ruling that enforcing rules prohibiting unhoused people from camping on public property does not constitute "cruel and unusual punishment". This has allowed local governments to more aggressively enforce camping bans and punish homeless people for sleeping outside, even when shelter space is lacking.

The criminalization of homelessness can take many forms, including:

• Carrying out sweeps and confiscating personal property, including tents, bedding, clothing, medications, etc.
• Making panhandling illegal.
• Making it illegal for groups to share food with homeless persons in public spaces.
• Enforcing "quality of life" ordinances relating to public activity and hygiene.

These measures do not address the root causes of homelessness and poverty but instead create barriers for those trying to help. For example, food-sharing restrictions are often justified on the basis of public health and safety concerns, such as the risk of spreading Hepatitis A among the homeless population. However, homeless advocates argue that these issues can be addressed without banning sharing food, and there is no documented case of food poisoning resulting from food shared with hungry people in public places.

The criminalization of homelessness has serious negative consequences, including:

• A criminal record that makes it even more difficult for homeless individuals to find employment and housing, and access services.
• Punishing people for carrying out life-sustaining activities in public when there are no alternatives, further exacerbating their suffering.
• Failing to address the underlying causes of homelessness and instead, undermining efforts to help.
• Forcing homeless people to move to more isolated and hazardous locations, increasing their risk of harm.

First Amendment rights

In the United States, there are laws in various cities that restrict the distribution of food to homeless people. These laws are often justified by lawmakers on the grounds of sanitation and public health concerns. However, critics argue that these laws effectively criminalize homelessness and are motivated by a desire to push homeless people out of certain areas.

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, among other rights. The question of whether feeding the homeless is protected by the First Amendment has been the subject of legal debate and court rulings.

In the case of *First Vagabonds Church of God v. City of Orlando*, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that feeding the homeless is "expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment". This ruling was made in the context of a dispute between the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and an organization called Food Not Bombs, which had been hosting weekly events in a public park where they served free meals to the homeless. The city had enacted an ordinance requiring a permit for sharing food in public parks, and members of Food Not Bombs were arrested for violating this ordinance.

The court's decision recognized that sharing food is a form of expression and political solidarity, and that the specific circumstances of Food Not Bombs' events—being open to the public, taking place near government buildings, and involving tables, banners, and literature distribution—contributed to conveying a message.

However, it is important to note that the court's ruling did not strike down the city's ordinance but sent the case back to a lower court to determine if the ordinance indeed violated the First Amendment rights of Food Not Bombs.

While this ruling is a significant victory for the right to feed the homeless, it is not a blanket authorization for all such activities. The court's decision was based on the specific context and circumstances of the Food Not Bombs events, and each case may be judged differently based on its unique facts.

In conclusion, while there may be legal risks associated with feeding the homeless in certain jurisdictions, the First Amendment provides some protection for these activities when they are deemed to be expressive conduct or political speech. The details of each situation will determine how the law applies.

Frequently asked questions