Can Scientific Laws Be Broken?

Scientific laws are statements that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena, based on repeated experiments or observations. They are developed from data and can be further developed through mathematics. Scientific laws are not set in stone and can be broken. In fact, many laws of physics have been broken over the centuries, and some are actively being broken now. This is a good thing as it means there is more to learn about the universe. For example, scientists at the University of New South Wales found what seem to be discrepancies in the fine structure constant, a number that describes how subatomic particles interact with each other and is thought to remain perfectly unchanging. This bold claim, if proven true, would fundamentally alter our understanding of the universe.

Laws of physics can be broken

The idea that laws are made to be broken is a common belief in the world of sports, but in science and engineering, it is thought that laws exist to be broken, too. This is because, in science, all knowledge, including the most important laws, is provisional and based on evidence. If the evidence changes, then our knowledge of physics must be updated, which may involve tearing down laws. This is how we progress in our knowledge and become ever more sophisticated in our understanding of nature.

The word "law" in physics has a loose definition. Sometimes, the term applies to properties of the natural world that have been consistently observed to be true for a long time. Sometimes, the word is attached to fundamental ideas that form the bedrock of large, sprawling, complex theories of the cosmos. And sometimes, it is just a throwback term that doesn't even apply anymore.

Many laws of physics have been broken over the centuries, and some are actively being broken right now. For example, Newton's law of universal gravitation was a major step forward in our understanding of gravity and the wider universe. However, it was found to be incomplete, as it could not completely describe the orbit of Mercury. This led to Einstein's theory of general relativity, which provided a more universal and complicated description of gravity.

Another example is Bode's law, proposed in 1715, which stated that each planet should be roughly twice as far away from the Sun as the next planet inwards. This law was overturned soon after it was stated, as it failed after the discovery of Neptune.

There are also "in-between" laws, which hold true but reveal a larger understanding of the cosmos as we discover more about the universe. Newton's law of universal gravitation is an example of this, as it is still useful in most of the universe, but in more intense scenarios, like around a black hole, or when more precision is needed, it must be "broken" and upgraded to relativity.

In conclusion, it is possible to break the laws of physics, and doing so helps us to progress and improve our understanding of the universe.

Scientific laws are not absolute

Scientific laws are not set in stone, and they are constantly being tested and challenged. As Lan Yang, an engineering professor at Washington University, states, "To push the boundaries of science and engineering, you need to break the old laws to open up different insights, scenarios, structures, and possibilities." This view is supported by the fact that many laws have been broken over the centuries, and some are actively being challenged today. For instance, a team of particle physicists, including Jack Sandweiss, broke the law of parity, which was previously thought to be adhered to by the strong force that holds together subatomic particles.

The laws of physics are not absolute truths but rather tools to help us understand the world around us. They are subject to change as we gain new knowledge and make new discoveries. This is a positive thing as it allows us to progress in our understanding of nature and the universe. As our understanding of the universe evolves, so too must our scientific laws.

Furthermore, the term "law" itself is loosely defined and can refer to properties of the natural world consistently observed to be true or fundamental ideas that form complex theories of the cosmos. Some laws are approximate, serving as good approximations with restricted domains of applicability. For example, Newton's law of universal gravitation is a low-mass approximation of general relativity.

Scientific laws are also limited in their scope of application. For instance, Ohm's law only applies to linear networks, and Newton's law of universal gravitation only applies in weak gravitational fields. These laws remain useful but only under specific conditions.

In conclusion, scientific laws are not absolute and can be broken or proven wrong through new evidence, observations, and experiments. This process of challenging and updating our understanding of the world through scientific discovery is essential for the progress of science and our understanding of the universe.

Laws are based on repeated experiments

Scientific laws are based on repeated experiments or observations that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena. They are developed from data and can be further developed through mathematics. They are directly or indirectly based on empirical evidence.

Scientific laws are typically conclusions based on repeated scientific experiments and observations over many years and which have become accepted universally within the scientific community. They are inferred from particular facts and are applicable to a defined group or class of phenomena. They are expressible by the statement that a particular phenomenon will always occur if certain conditions are present.

Scientific laws are true within their regime of validity. They are universal, simple, absolute, stable, all-encompassing, generally conservative of quantity, and often expressions of existing homogeneities of space and time. They are also typically theoretically reversible in time (if non-quantum).

Scientific laws are constantly being tested experimentally to increasing degrees of precision, which is one of the main goals of science. It is always possible for laws to be invalidated or proven to have limitations by repeatable experimental evidence. Well-established laws have been invalidated in some special cases, but the new formulations created to explain the discrepancies generalize upon the original laws.

Scientific laws are not absolute and are based on the evidence. If the evidence changes, then our knowledge of physics is updated, and laws may be torn down.

Laws can be contradicted, restricted or extended

Scientific laws are based on repeated experiments or observations and can be summarised as statements that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena. The laws are developed from data and can be further developed through mathematics. They are discovered, rather than invented, and are based on empirical evidence.

Scientific laws are not set in stone and can be contradicted, restricted, or extended by future observations. They are not absolute and are not expressions of absolute certainty like mathematical theorems. They are simply conclusions based on repeated scientific experiments and observations over many years.

For example, in the early 1950s, it was discovered that the weak force, which is responsible for nuclear radioactivity, breaks the parity law, a fundamental law of nature that states that the laws of physics remain unchanged when expressed in inverted coordinates.

Another example is Newton's law of universal gravitation, which was a major step forward in our understanding of gravity and the wider universe. However, it was found to be incomplete as it could not completely describe the orbit of Mercury. Einstein's theory of general relativity provided a more universal and complicated description, extending our understanding of gravity.

In some cases, laws may be contradicted or restricted to certain conditions. For instance, Ohm's law only applies to linear networks, and Newton's law of universal gravitation only applies in weak gravitational fields.

The laws of physics are not unchanging; they are constantly being tested and improved upon. While well-established laws have been invalidated in some special cases, new formulations are created to explain these discrepancies, building upon and refining the original laws.

In conclusion, scientific laws can be contradicted, restricted, or extended. This process of scientific discovery and refinement helps us to deepen our understanding of the natural world and the universe.

Laws are distillations of results of repeated observation

Scientific laws are not set in stone. They are based on repeated experiments or observations and can be further developed through mathematics. They are also subject to change if new evidence comes to light.

Scientific laws are distillations of the results of repeated observation. They are not absolute truths, but rather empirical conclusions reached through the scientific method. They are intended to be free of ontological commitments or statements of logical absolutes. In other words, they are based on what we can observe and measure, rather than theoretical or philosophical ideas.

A scientific law can be formulated as one or several statements or equations that predict the outcome of an experiment. For example, the law of conservation of energy can be written as:

ΔE=0

Where E is the total amount of energy in the universe.

Another example is Newton's second law, which can be written as:

F=dp/dt

These laws are based on repeated observations of natural phenomena and are used to make predictions about future experiments. For instance, the law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This law is based on the repeated observation that the total amount of energy in a closed system remains constant.

While scientific laws are based on repeated observations, they can also be contradicted or restricted by future observations. For example, the weak force, which is responsible for nuclear radioactivity, was found to break the parity law, which states that the laws of physics remain unchanged when expressed in inverted coordinates. Additionally, well-established laws have been invalidated in some special cases, leading to the creation of new formulations that generalize rather than overthrow the original laws.

In summary, scientific laws are distillations of results from repeated observations, and they play a crucial role in helping us understand and predict natural phenomena. However, they are not absolute and can be contradicted or refined as new evidence emerges.

Frequently asked questions