Joking About Law-Breaking: Harmless Fun Or A Step Too Far?

Joking about breaking the law can be a risky business, and it's not always easy to predict when a harmless joke might land you in hot water. While just kidding may work to defuse an awkward social situation, it's not always a successful defence in court. The consequences of joking about illegal activities can range from criminal charges to civil lawsuits, and it all depends on the context, the specific laws in your jurisdiction, and the interpretation of those laws by law enforcement and the courts.

Joking about bombs on planes

In the United States, such behaviour can fall under the "bomb hoax" law, or 18 U.S. Code 35, which carries potential penalties of up to five years in prison, fines of up to $5,000, or a combination of both. Even if the charges are dropped, as in the case of NFL player Trevor Davis, who joked about explosives in his suitcase, the consequences can be significant.

Several real-world examples illustrate the gravity of the situation. In 2019, a 17-year-old named Hector Fernando Fonseca posted threatening messages on Snapchat before boarding a flight. He included his location at the airport, emojis of a smiley face and a bomb, and captions like "time to blow up the plane." Snapchat alerted the FBI, and Fonseca was later charged with making a terroristic threat, a third-degree felony, facing up to 10 years in prison. Similarly, Cameron E. Korth was arrested by the FBI for writing a note about a bomb on a United Airlines flight, leading to a potential penalty of up to 10 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine.

Joking about guns in schools

Joking about breaking the law can sometimes land you in trouble. This is especially true when it comes to joking about guns in schools. In the United States, guns are the number one cause of death for children under 19, and the topic of gun violence in schools is a sensitive and serious issue.

In 2018, a man from Texarkana, Texas, posted a picture of an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle on Instagram with the caption, "I'm thinking about finally going back to school." This "joke" was reported to the authorities, and the man, Ricky Jared Rankin, was arrested by police and FBI agents outside his home. This example illustrates the potential consequences of joking about guns in schools and the serious response it can provoke from law enforcement.

Additionally, joking about guns in schools can have tragic consequences if potential threats are not taken seriously. The Sandy Hook Promise Foundation, an advocacy group working to prevent gun violence, created a Public Service Announcement (PSA) called "Just Joking" to address this issue. The PSA features comedians delivering lines that seem funny out of context but are actually taken from the writings of school shooters. The message of the PSA is to take potential shooters seriously and not dismiss their threats as jokes.

The CEO and co-founder of the Sandy Hook Promise Foundation, Nicole Hockley, emphasized that teaching warning signs and recognizing at-risk behavior is crucial. She shared her personal tragedy of losing her 6-year-old son, Dylan, in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012. Hockley noted that kids often fail to alert authorities about potential threats because they think their peers are joking or they don't want to be perceived as creating drama or being a snitch. The foundation's work focuses on helping parents, students, and others recognize these warning signs and take action to prevent gun violence.

In conclusion, joking about guns in schools is not humorous or lighthearted. It is a sensitive topic that can have serious consequences. It is important to recognize the impact of gun violence on communities and take action to prevent potential tragedies. By spreading awareness and having meaningful conversations, we can play a pivotal role in creating safer schools and communities for everyone.

Joking about sexual harassment

Sexual jokes can include sexually explicit jokes, innuendos, or injecting humour into discussions of sexual topics. These jokes can contribute to a hostile work environment, particularly when they are persistent and coupled with frequent sexual conversations and visual displays of sexual or demeaning pictures. A hostile work environment is one where the discriminatory behaviour makes it difficult for others to perform their essential work duties or feel safe in the workplace.

To establish a claim for sexual harassment, employees typically need evidence of multiple jokes that, when taken together, create an offensive, uncomfortable, or unwelcoming work environment. These jokes can take various forms, such as demeaning jokes about gender, sex, or sexual orientation; sexually explicit jokes or innuendos; or jokes about an employee's appearance. It is important to note that the jokes do not have to target a specific individual to be considered sexual harassment. Jokes that are generally about either sex or sexual activity can be sufficient.

If you believe that jokes being told at work are discriminating against a particular sex, it is essential to report them to a supervisor or manager. Employers have a legal duty to investigate and take meaningful action to correct the problem. Failure to do so can result in legal consequences, and employees may be entitled to financial compensation for emotional distress, loss of income, and other costs associated with the hostile work environment.

In conclusion, joking about sexual harassment is no trivial matter. It can have severe consequences for both the joker and the affected individuals, impacting their sense of safety and well-being in the workplace. Employers must take proactive steps to address such behaviour and create a safe and respectful work environment for all employees.

Joking about stealing

The line between "inspired by" and "copied from" is a fine one, and it's not always clear-cut. Some comics have defended reusing other people's jokes as satire, calque (word-for-word translation), or "borrowing." In the past, it was common for performers in music halls and vaudeville to "borrow" material, with the etiquette being that the borrower added to the joke and made it their own. With the rise of comedy in the 1970s and the increasing popularity of stand-up in the 1980s and 1990s, joke theft became more prominent.

The impact of having a joke stolen can be significant. Jokes have a limited shelf life, and once they become familiar, the originator can no longer use them as the impact is lost. If a well-known comic uses another person's joke, the joke's originator, if they're a professional comic, may not be able to use their own joke anymore as it has become too familiar. This can be detrimental to their career, as comics rely on their joke-writing and material to earn a living.

While there may be no legal recourse for joke theft, it can have serious consequences for the joke-teller and the joke writer. So, while joking about stealing in the form of joke theft may not be illegal, it can certainly lead to backlash, humiliation, and damage to one's career and reputation.

Joking about food tampering

In the United States, food tampering is considered a serious offense and is criminalized under US Code 1365, which addresses "consumer product tampering." This law specifically targets those who tamper with food products with "reckless disregard" for the potential harm caused to consumers. Even if no one is harmed, the attempt to tamper or taint food is still considered a federal crime.

The consequences of food tampering can range from civil liability for assault and battery to more severe charges such as attempted murder, depending on the severity and intent of the tampering. Additionally, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plays a crucial role in ensuring food safety. They have enhanced surveillance of foodborne diseases and increased inspections of food processing plants to prevent intentional tampering and reduce the risk of disease outbreaks.

As consumers, it is essential to be vigilant and report any suspected food tampering incidents to the relevant authorities. This includes reporting to store managers, local police departments, and specific hotlines for meat and poultry or other food products. Taking these precautions helps protect oneself and others from potential harm.

In conclusion, joking about food tampering should be avoided due to the serious nature of the topic. What may seem like a harmless joke to one person can cause alarm or distress to others, especially those with allergies, dietary restrictions, or past experiences with food-related issues. It is always better to err on the side of caution and refrain from making light of food tampering, as it can have legal, health, and safety implications.

Frequently asked questions