Hillary's Dossier: Breaking Election Laws And Trust

Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign has been mired in controversy, with some alleging that she broke election laws. The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) were accused of misreporting payments made to a law firm during the campaign to obscure spending on opposition research. This research eventually became the infamous Steele dossier, which sought to uncover alleged links between Donald Trump and Russia. The Clinton campaign hired Fusion GPS, an intelligence firm, to conduct this research, but classified the spending as legal services on FEC forms. While the DNC denied any wrongdoing, they agreed to pay a fine of $113,000 to settle the Federal Election Commission (FEC) investigation. Additionally, Clinton faced scrutiny for her use of a private email server while at the Department of State, raising concerns about the security of classified information. These controversies sparked intense debates and investigations, with some arguing that Clinton broke election and other laws.

Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC paid a fine for obscuring funding of the Steele dossier

Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) have been fined for obscuring their funding of the "Steele dossier", an opposition research report that sought to highlight alleged links between Donald Trump and Russia. The Clinton campaign hired the law firm Perkins Coie, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Trump's ties to Russia. However, on Federal Election Commission (FEC) forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as "legal services".

The FEC fined the Clinton campaign $8,000 and the DNC $105,000 to settle an investigation into whether they violated campaign finance law by misreporting spending on the Steele dossier. The complaint, filed in 2018 by the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, accused the Democrats of misreporting payments made to Perkins Coie during the 2016 campaign to obscure the true purpose of the spending.

The Steele dossier was a report compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele and financed by the Democratic Party. It included salacious allegations about Trump's conduct in Russia and alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. The dossier has been largely discredited since its publication, with core aspects exposed as unsupported and unproven rumors.

Election law experts are divided on whether Clinton and the DNC violated a ban on foreign contributions to campaigns or whether the potential disclosure violations through filtering payments through a law firm were the main issue. Some experts argue that paying a foreign national to conduct opposition research could be a violation of election law, while others disagree, stating that there is no prohibition on paying foreigners at market value to perform services.

The DNC played down the decision, saying they settled "aging and silly complaints" about "purpose descriptions" in their FEC report. However, the conservative advocacy group the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, which filed the original complaint, called the DNC's description "appalling". They believe the FEC should have made a criminal referral to the Justice Department.

Clinton's campaign hired Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research on Trump's ties to Russia

In 2016, Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) hired the services of Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Donald Trump's ties to Russia. The Clinton campaign hired Perkins Coie, a law firm, which then hired Fusion GPS to carry out this task.

Fusion GPS was co-founded in 2011 by Glenn R. Simpson, a former investigative journalist, and Peter Fritsch, a former senior editor at the Wall Street Journal. The company is based in Washington, D.C., and provides research and strategic advice to political campaigns, among other clients.

In the case of the Clinton campaign's opposition research, Fusion GPS retained Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 agent and British corporate intelligence investigator, to research any Russian connections to Trump. Steele produced a series of uncorroborated memos, which became known as the Steele dossier. This dossier included unverified and salacious allegations about Trump, such as claims of collusion with the Kremlin to win the 2016 election.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC came under scrutiny for how they reported the funding of the Steele dossier. They were accused of misreporting the spending on research by classifying it as "legal services" or "legal and compliance consulting" instead of opposition research on their FEC forms. This led to questions about whether they had violated campaign finance laws and intentionally obscured the true nature of the payments.

As a result of these concerns, the Coolidge Reagan Foundation filed an administrative complaint in 2018, accusing the Democrats of misreporting payments. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) investigated the matter, and in 2022, the Clinton campaign and the DNC agreed to pay a total of $113,000 in fines to settle the investigation. The Clinton campaign paid $8,000, while the DNC was fined $105,000. It is important to note that they settled without conceding to avoid further legal costs.

Clinton's campaign and the DNC may have violated a ban on foreign contributions to campaigns

The Clinton campaign's funding of the Steele dossier, which sought to highlight alleged links between Donald Trump and Russia, raised questions about potential violations of election laws. The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) were accused of misreporting payments made to a law firm, Perkins Coie, during the 2016 campaign. The law firm then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Trump's ties to Russia. The Clinton campaign classified the spending as "legal services" on FEC forms, rather than accurately disclosing it as opposition research. This led to allegations that Clinton's campaign and the DNC intentionally obscured their payments to avoid reporting their true purpose, which was to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

Election law experts are divided on the specific crimes that may have been committed. Some experts believe that Clinton and the DNC may have violated a ban on foreign contributions to campaigns. This argument stems from the involvement of former British spy Christopher Steele, who was hired by Fusion GPS to compile the dossier. Paying a foreign national for opposition research could be considered a violation of campaign finance laws. Attorney Cleta Mitchell, a Republican election law expert, emphasized the seriousness of this issue, stating that it is a "big damned deal" and could be a felony if the amount exceeds $25,000. However, others disagree with this interpretation, arguing that there is no prohibition on paying foreigners at market value for their services.

In 2022, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) fined Clinton's 2016 campaign $8,000 and the DNC $105,000 for obscuring their funding of the Steele dossier. The FEC concluded that the campaign mislabeled Steele's work as "legal services" and "legal and compliance consulting" in campaign filings. This settlement was made without Clinton's campaign or the DNC conceding any wrongdoing, as they sought to avoid further legal costs. While the fine indicates a violation of campaign finance laws, the specific nature of the violation was not explicitly stated, and the DNC downplayed the decision, referring to the complaints as "silly" and related to "purpose descriptions" in their FEC report.

Clinton's campaign and the DNC were accused of filing misleading campaign finance reports

Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) were accused of filing misleading campaign finance reports. The Clinton campaign hired law firm Perkins Coie, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Republican candidate Donald Trump's ties to Russia. However, on FEC forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as "legal services".

The Coolidge Reagan Foundation filed an administrative complaint in 2018, accusing the Democrats of misreporting payments made to Perkins Coie during the 2016 campaign to obscure the true purpose of the spending. The initial complaint alleged that by misreporting the payments, the Clinton campaign and the DNC were able to avoid publicly disclosing that they were paying Fusion GPS to perform opposition research on Trump, with the intent of influencing the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC argued that the payments had been described accurately. However, they ultimately agreed to settle without conceding, to avoid further legal costs. As a result of the settlement, the Clinton campaign agreed to a civil penalty of $8,000, and the DNC agreed to pay $105,000, according to conciliatory agreements attached to the letter sent to the Coolidge Reagan Foundation.

The Steele dossier, financed by the Democrats, included allegations about Trump's conduct in Russia and alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. While the dossier has been largely discredited, it played a significant role in sparking allegations and investigations during the early months of Trump's presidency.

Clinton's campaign could be in trouble for not accurately disclosing its payments to a law firm

Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) have been accused of violating campaign finance laws by misreporting spending on research that eventually became the infamous Steele dossier. The dossier, compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele, contained allegations about Donald Trump's conduct in Russia and alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The Clinton campaign hired the law firm Perkins Coie, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Trump's ties to Russia. However, on FEC forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as "legal services". This misreporting led to accusations that the campaign and the DNC intentionally obscured their payments to avoid publicly disclosing their true purpose.

The Coolidge Reagan Foundation, a conservative advocacy group, filed an administrative complaint in 2018, accusing the Democrats of misreporting payments made to Perkins Coie during the 2016 campaign. The Clinton campaign and the DNC agreed to pay a total of $113,000 to settle the Federal Election Commission (FEC) investigation without conceding any wrongdoing, citing the desire to avoid further legal costs.

The controversy surrounding the Steele dossier and the Clinton campaign's funding of it has sparked debates among election law experts. Some believe that the Clinton campaign and the DNC may have violated a ban on foreign contributions to campaigns, while others disagree and emphasise potential disclosure violations by filtering payments through a law firm.

Jan Baran, a Federal Election Commission expert, stated that while it is not illegal for campaigns to hire opposition research firms, questions arise when they fail to accurately report the money they spend on it. He pointed out that the Clinton campaign's FEC reports did not include any payments to Fusion GPS, and the expenses attributed to Perkins Coie were described as legal work rather than opposition research. This led to accusations of misleading campaign finance reports, with the potential for civil or criminal penalties if the misrepresentation was shown to be willful and knowing.

In conclusion, while the Clinton campaign and the DNC settled the FEC investigation without conceding wrongdoing, the controversy surrounding the Steele dossier and the campaign's funding of it has fuelled debates about potential violations of election laws, specifically regarding accurate disclosure of payments to the law firm Perkins Coie.

Frequently asked questions