Florida's Abortion Law: Six-Week Ban Overview

Florida's six-week abortion ban, which came into effect on May 1, 2024, is one of the most restrictive in the country. The ban outlaws abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, which is before many people know they are pregnant and can be detected on an ultrasound. The law has been criticised for endangering patients' health and violating individual reproductive freedom.

The law requires two in-person appointments, at least 24 hours apart, to receive an abortion

Florida's abortion law requires two in-person appointments, at least 24 hours apart, to receive an abortion. This means that, in practice, people have less than two weeks to confirm their pregnancy and book the two appointments before receiving abortion care. This is because the law requires doctors to count the age of a pregnancy from the first day of the person's last menstrual period. This means that by the time someone misses their period and finds out they are pregnant, they are already considered to be four weeks pregnant.

The two appointments are for an abortion consultation and then the procedure itself. The mandatory waiting period between the two appointments further narrows the window for care. This waiting period is particularly challenging for people who have to travel long distances to reach abortion-providing facilities.

The 24-hour waiting period is one of several restrictions that abortion-rights supporters say will dramatically curb access to the procedure for thousands of Florida residents. Clinics are already reporting increased demand and longer waiting times.

The ban includes exceptions for fatal foetal diagnosis and to save the life of the pregnant person

Florida's abortion ban includes exceptions for fatal foetal diagnoses and situations where the pregnant person's life is at risk. In the case of fatal foetal diagnoses, abortions are permitted until the third trimester. However, the definition of "fatal" has caused confusion among doctors, who risk felony charges if they misinterpret the law. This has resulted in some women being denied abortions even when their foetus has been diagnosed with fatal abnormalities.

For example, in the case of Baby Milo, who was born with no kidneys and underdeveloped lungs, doctors refused to terminate the pregnancy as long as his heart was still beating, despite a diagnosis of Potter syndrome, a rare and lethal condition. Deborah Dorbert, Milo's mother, was forced to carry her pregnancy to term, inducing labour at 37 weeks. Milo lived for 99 minutes.

In another case, a woman named Emily Friend discovered that her foetus had Trisomy 18, a chromosomal condition that is fatal before the first year of life in more than 90% of cases. Friend was unable to access an abortion in Florida and had to travel to Virginia to terminate her pregnancy.

These cases illustrate the challenges and ambiguities surrounding the exceptions to Florida's abortion ban, particularly in situations where a foetal anomaly is not immediately life-threatening but is highly likely to result in death before or shortly after birth. The interpretation of the law by medical professionals and the potential legal consequences of misinterpreting it have significant implications for the ability of pregnant people to access abortions in Florida.

There are exceptions for rape, incest, or human trafficking up to 15 weeks of pregnancy

Florida's abortion law, which came into effect on May 1, 2024, restricts abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. However, there are exceptions to this rule for survivors of rape, incest, or human trafficking, who can access abortions until 15 weeks into the pregnancy.

To qualify for this exception, survivors are required to provide specific documentation as evidence of their circumstances. This includes a police report, medical record, restraining order, or other court-issued documents. The healthcare provider must verify and document this information to comply with Florida's abortion laws.

These requirements have been criticised as “unrealistic" and "incredibly cruel" by abortion rights advocates, who argue that many survivors do not feel safe or comfortable reporting assaults. Nevertheless, the exception provides a crucial avenue for those who are able to meet the stringent documentation requirements.

The exception for rape, incest, or human trafficking in Florida's abortion law demonstrates a recognition of the unique circumstances faced by survivors. By allowing abortions up to 15 weeks in these cases, the law provides additional time for those who may have delayed pregnancy discovery or faced barriers in accessing reproductive healthcare.

It is important to note that the exception has specific conditions and limitations that must be met. The survivor must provide the required documentation at the time of the abortion appointment, and the healthcare provider must comply with all statutory requirements to ensure the legality of the procedure.

The law has been criticised for endangering patients' health and future fertility

Florida's six-week abortion ban has been criticised for endangering patients' health and future fertility. The ban has been described as "unworkable" by clinicians, who have stated that it endangers patients' health and survival, as well as their own ability to comply with ethical obligations and medical standards of care.

The ban has been criticised for creating insurmountable barriers to abortion care for many patients. Clinicians have described how the ban's narrow exceptions and criminalisation of abortion from a very early stage of pregnancy are endangering patients' health. They have also stated that the ban disproportionately impacts low-income and marginalised communities, who already face barriers to prenatal and maternal healthcare.

The ban has also been criticised for its impact on medical training. Clinicians have stated that the inability to provide training in abortion care is detrimental to the future of maternal healthcare in the state. They have also noted that Tough trainees and established reproductive healthcare providers are choosing to leave the state, exacerbating existing shortages of providers.

The ban has been described as a violation of patients' fundamental human rights, including their rights to life, health, privacy, freedom from torture and cruelty, and equality. Clinicians have also stated that the ban interferes with individual freedom to access healthcare and limits reproductive freedom.

Overall, the Florida six-week abortion ban has been criticised for endangering patients' health and future fertility, as well as having a detrimental impact on the healthcare system and patients' rights.

The ban has been described as a total abortion ban by critics

The six-week ban in Florida criminalizes the termination of pregnancy before many individuals are aware that they are pregnant. Clinicians have noted that their patients who come in seeking an abortion right when they discover that they are pregnant are often distraught that they are considered further along in their pregnancy than they had assumed and are unable to receive an abortion within Florida. Clinicians have also pointed out that the ban disproportionately impacts low-income and marginalized communities, who already face barriers to prenatal and maternal health care.

The ban has been described as a violation of individual reproductive freedom, leading to preventable suffering, and compelling clinicians to deviate from established standards of care and medical ethics. Clinicians have also noted that the ban interferes with individual freedom to access health care.

Frequently asked questions