Child Labor Law Violations: Understanding The Severe Consequences

Child labor laws are under attack in states across the US, with violations on the rise and lawmakers attempting to weaken the standards that protect children in the workplace. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 restricts the hours and types of duties that employers can require of children and teenagers. The US Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division enforces the FLSA and can impose a range of penalties on employers who violate child labor provisions, including civil money penalties of up to $11,000 per employee, criminal fines of up to $10,000, and imprisonment of up to six months for repeat offenses. To prevent and address child labor violations, states should increase funding for enforcement, create damages or restitution for victims, modify workers' compensation laws, increase detection efforts, and enact stop work order statutes, among other measures.

Fines of up to $100,000 for each child employed

The punishment for breaking child labor laws varies depending on the nature of the violation and the jurisdiction in which it occurs. However, in the United States, the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division is responsible for enforcing the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which includes restrictions on child labor. Under this Act, employers found to be in violation of child labor provisions may be subject to civil and criminal penalties.

Civil penalties for violating child labor laws can be substantial. The Department of Labor can levy fines of up to $100,000 for each child employed in violation of the law. This means that if an employer is found to have illegally employed multiple children, the total fine could quickly escalate. Each instance of a child being employed is considered a separate violation, and the financial penalties can add up. The fine for each violation can be as high as $11,000. However, if the violation results in a child suffering a serious injury or death, the fine increases to $50,000 per violation. These penalties are designed to deter employers from violating child labor laws and to hold them accountable for any harm caused to children as a result of illegal employment.

In addition to civil penalties, criminal sanctions may also be imposed for willful violations of child labor laws. For a first offense, an employer may face a criminal fine of up to $10,000. If the employer is a repeat offender and is convicted of a second willful violation, they may be subject to a fine of up to $10,000 and imprisonment for up to six months, or both. These criminal sanctions are intended to send a strong message to employers about the seriousness of child labor violations and to deter future violations.

The Department of Labor has the authority to conduct investigations and levy fines, and they take violations of child labor laws very seriously. Employers who are found to be in violation of these laws may face significant financial consequences and even jail time in certain circumstances. It is important for employers to be aware of the applicable child labor laws and to ensure compliance to avoid these harsh penalties.

Criminal action, including fines and imprisonment

Criminal action can be initiated in the Federal Courts in the case of a willful violation of child labor rules. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) provides for a fine of up to $10,000 for a willful violation. For a second offense committed after the conviction for a prior offense, a person can also be imprisoned for not more than six months, or both. Employers who willfully break the law or who believe their actions are subject to impunity, can be ordered to pay $10,000. If they do it again, they risk going to jail for up to six months, paying $10,000 or both.

The FLSA also gives an employee the right to file a complaint with the Wage and Hour Division and testify or in other ways cooperate with an investigation or legal proceeding without being fired or discriminated against in any other manner.

The Department of Labor can also take the following actions:

• Assess civil money penalties.
• Seek an injunction in the Federal Courts.
• Take a "hot goods" action in the Federal Courts.

The child labor "hot goods" provision of the FLSA prohibits the shipment or delivery of goods in interstate commerce that were produced in or about an establishment where a child labor violation occurred in the past 30 days. It is also a violation of the FLSA to fire or in any other manner discriminate against an employee for filing a complaint or for participating in a legal proceeding under the FLSA.

In addition to federal laws, many states have their own criminal penalties for child labor violations. For example, in Maryland, a person who employs a minor in violation of the child labor law is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine not exceeding $1,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or both. In Louisiana, the penalty is a fine of between $100-$500 or imprisonment of 30 days to 6 months, or both. Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Kansas also have specific criminal penalties for child labor violations.

Injunctions to stop the transportation of goods produced using child labour

Child labour laws are statutes that place restrictions and regulations on the work of minors. These laws aim to protect children from dangerous working conditions and ensure they receive an education. While most countries have implemented child labour laws, violations of these laws and exploitation of children are still prevalent, especially in certain industries and regions.

In response to increasing violations, governments have imposed penalties and punishments for individuals or entities that break child labour laws. One such punishment is an injunction, a court order requiring an individual or entity to take or refrain from specific actions. In the context of child labour laws, an injunction can be sought to stop the transportation of goods produced using child labour.

In the United States, the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division enforces the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which sets restrictions on the hours and types of duties that employers can require of children and teenagers. Under this Act, the Department of Labor has the authority to investigate possible violations, examine employer records, and interview employees. If violations are found, the Department can seek an injunction in the Federal Courts to stop the violations and require the employer to comply with the child labour regulations.

A "hot goods" injunction is a specific type of injunction that can be sought in child labour cases. This type of injunction prevents an employer from shipping or delivering goods for shipment in commerce if oppressive child labour was employed in their production within the past 30 days. Oppressive child labour is considered to have occurred when the child labour rules are violated, such as restrictions on the hours or types of work that children are permitted to perform.

The consequences of breaking child labour laws can be severe, with fines ranging from $11,000 to $100,000 per violation, and imprisonment for up to six months for repeated or willful violations. These penalties aim to deter employers from exploiting child labour and protect the rights and safety of children.

Increased state-level penalties and enforcement

State governments can play a critical role in implementing policies to combat the recent rise in child labour violations. State-level enforcers of child labour laws, such as state departments of labour, should increase funding for enforcement and create more stringent civil and criminal penalties for violators to deter violations.

State-level penalties for child labour violations should be increased to adequate levels to deter violations. The appropriate penalty level may differ based on the state economy, but it should be set with the goal of deterring and punishing violations. States should adopt a penalty schedule that is equal to or greater than the penalties under the Fair Labour Standards Act (FLSA). For example, the maximum civil monetary penalty for child labour violations in Maine is $50,000, while in California and Delaware, it is $10,000.

In addition to increasing penalties, states can allow penalties to be distributed to child labour victims or use penalty funds to remediate harm to victims. This approach can help address the needs of child labour victims and incentivise reporting of violations. States can also increase criminal sanctions for child labour violations. Criminal penalties for child labour violations are generally minimal and do not reflect the seriousness of the offence. Increasing criminal penalties can send a strong message to employers and deter violations.

Furthermore, states can create clear and attainable accountability for lead corporations with child labour violations in their supply chain. Lead corporations should be held liable for violations in their supply chain, especially in cases of repeat or widespread violations. States can also enact stop work order statutes or pass state-level "hot goods" provisions to halt the flow of illegally produced goods and notify the public.

Another measure is to require and effectively use employment certificates or work permits for minors. Work permits protect teenagers' access to education and ensure that parents or guardians have given permission for a child to work. They can also help prevent violations and facilitate enforcement of child labour laws. States that do not currently require work permits should enact them, and states with existing requirements should review and update their processes.

Finally, states can require workers' rights education in schools to increase awareness of workplace rights among minors and the community, which can help prevent and address child labour violations.

Whistleblower programs and private rights of action

Whistleblower programs are designed to protect employees who report evidence of wrongdoing within an organization. These programs shield whistleblowers from retaliation, such as termination of employment, unreasonable increases in workload, or bullying, and ensure their anonymity. Whistleblowers can use internal channels, such as reporting to a supervisor or human resources, or external channels like media outlets, government agencies, or law enforcement to disclose information.

In the United States, the Department of Labor's Whistleblower Protection Program safeguards employees from retaliation for exercising their rights. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), a part of the Department of Labor, enforces whistleblower protections for employees who suffer retaliation under more than 20 federal laws. OSHA investigators are neutral fact-finders who examine complaints of retaliation.

Additionally, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces laws prohibiting discrimination against employees based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information. The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the Department of Labor enforces federal laws on minimum wage, overtime pay, record-keeping, and child labor requirements.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) protects the rights of private-sector employees to join together to improve their wages and working conditions. The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) handles claims of retaliation within the executive branch of the federal government, including allegations of wrongdoing, gross mismanagement, or abuse of authority.

Furthermore, the Department of Justice (DOJ) protects whistleblowers from retaliation through its Office of the Inspector General (OIG). DOJ employees, contractors, and grantees can submit retaliation complaints to the OSC or the OIG Hotline. The OIG Whistleblower Protection Coordinator provides additional information and assistance.

Private rights of action refer to an individual's ability to bring a lawsuit against another party for violating their legal rights. In the context of whistleblower protection, private rights of action empower whistleblowers to take legal action against their employers or organizations if they experience retaliation or violation of their rights.

For example, in the United States, federal whistleblower legislation includes statutes protecting all government employees from retaliation. Federal employees can demonstrate a violation of their rights by showing that they made a protected disclosure, the accused official was aware of the disclosure, retaliation occurred, and there was a connection between the retaliation and the employee's action.

Additionally, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (FSGO) protect whistleblowers in the private sector. These laws provide a legal framework for individuals to seek redress if their rights are violated as a result of reporting misconduct or illegal activities.

Overall, whistleblower programs and private rights of action are crucial for safeguarding individuals who expose wrongdoing, ensuring they can take action without fear of reprisal and promoting accountability in organizations and government bodies.

Frequently asked questions