Clinton's Private Server: What Laws Were Broken?

Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server for official and personal business while at the Department of State has sparked a political and legal quagmire. Clinton's use of the private email server came to light during an investigation into her conduct and knowledge of the Libyan embassy attack by the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee On Benghazi. This incident has led to an active investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Counterintelligence Division into her allegedly unlawful use of a private server. While the investigation is ongoing, Clinton's actions have taken a back seat to the media frenzy surrounding the Benghazi scandal and her presidential candidacy. However, the potential legal and political ramifications for Clinton remain significant.

Clinton's use of a private email server was a breach of State Department security guidelines

Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State was a breach of State Department security guidelines.

The State Department's inspector general's report, released in May 2016, found that Clinton's use of a private email server broke government rules. The report contradicted Clinton's repeated assertion that her server was allowed and that no permission was needed. It concluded that Clinton would not have been allowed to use the server if she had asked the department officials in charge of information security.

The report also found that Clinton's use of mobile devices to conduct official business on her personal email account and private server went against department security guidelines. She never sought approval from senior information officers, who would have refused the request because of security risks.

Clinton's use of a private server was also a potential security risk. The inspector general's report found that there were several suspected hacking attempts in 2011, which were never reported to department information security officials, in breach of department rules. In 2016, the FBI concluded that Clinton had been "extremely careless" in handling classified materials, yet she faced no real consequences.

Clinton's use of mobile devices to conduct official business was a breach of security protocols

Hillary Clinton's use of mobile devices to conduct official business was a breach of security protocols.

During her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Clinton drew controversy by using a private email server for official public communications rather than using official State Department email accounts maintained on federal servers.

Clinton's use of mobile devices to conduct official business on her personal email account and private server ran counter to department security guidelines. She used a private email server for official and personal business while at the Department of State. This included using a private email server to conduct official government business in blatant violation of security protocols.

Clinton's use of BlackBerrys before her appointment as Secretary of State in 2009 was also flagged as a security risk by State Department security personnel. The email account used on Clinton's BlackBerry was then hosted on a private server in the basement of her home in Chappaqua, New York, but that information was not disclosed to State Department security personnel or senior State Department personnel.

Clinton was warned by State Department security personnel about the vulnerability of an unsecured BlackBerry to hacking. She affirmed her knowledge of the danger but continued to use her BlackBerry outside her office.

Clinton's use of mobile devices to conduct official business was a clear breach of security protocols, and her actions have been criticised as "systematically destroy [ing] evidence in breach of federal laws".

Clinton's use of a private server was a breach of the Federal Records Act

Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State sparked controversy and resulted in an FBI investigation. While Clinton maintained that her use of the server complied with federal laws and State Department regulations, several experts, officials, and members of Congress contended that it violated the Federal Records Act.

The Federal Records Act requires agencies to retain all official communications and stipulates that government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records. It mandates that records must be maintained "by the agency" and readily found, ensuring they are accessible for congressional scrutiny.

Clinton's use of a private server was found to be inconsistent with these requirements. By using a personal email account and private server, she failed to ensure that her official communications were properly preserved and accessible to the State Department and Congress. This was a significant breach of the Federal Records Act, which seeks to ensure transparency and accountability in government.

The State Department's Inspector General also found that Clinton did not seek approval for her email arrangement and that staff who raised concerns about it were told to keep quiet. This further exacerbated the issue, as it indicated a deliberate attempt to circumvent standard record-keeping procedures.

While the FBI ultimately decided not to pursue charges, Clinton's actions had significant political ramifications and damaged her public image.

Clinton's use of a private server was a breach of State Department record-keeping rules

Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State sparked controversy and led to an FBI investigation. While no charges were filed, the investigation concluded that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in handling sensitive information.

Clinton's use of a private server breached State Department record-keeping rules and guidelines. The State Department's inspector general report found that Clinton's use of a private server was not approved and that she did not comply with department policies, which aim to comply with federal record laws.

The report highlighted that Clinton should have discussed the arrangement with security and technology officials, as the private server presented "security risks". It was also determined that Clinton's server did not contain any emails that were clearly marked as classified. However, federal agencies retrospectively identified 100 emails containing information that should have been deemed classified.

Clinton's actions contradicted her repeated assertion that her use of a private server was permitted and that no approval was needed. Her decision to use a private server was a significant departure from standard practice, as no other Secretary of State had done so previously.

The inspector general's report also revealed that staff members who raised concerns about Clinton's email practices were instructed to keep quiet and that their concerns were not addressed. This further highlights the breach of State Department record-keeping rules and the failure to follow proper protocols in addressing security risks.

Clinton's use of a private server was a breach of security protocols, leaving her emails vulnerable to hacking

Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State was a breach of security protocols, leaving her emails vulnerable to hacking.

Clinton's use of a private server was a blatant violation of security protocols. The State Department's inspector general report concluded that Clinton would not have been allowed to use the server had she asked the department officials in charge of information security. The report also stated that Clinton should have discussed the arrangement with the department's security and technology officials.

Clinton's actions were a clear breach of security protocols as she did not follow the necessary procedures for handling sensitive and classified information. Her private server was not approved by the State Department and posed a significant security risk. This was further exacerbated by her use of mobile devices to conduct official business, which increased the vulnerability of her system to potential hackers.

The private server was a target for hackers, with multiple suspected hacking attempts in 2011. Clinton and her staff were aware of these attempts and expressed concern. Despite this, they failed to report these incidents to the computer security personnel or anyone else within the Department, as required by the Department's rules.

Clinton's actions had serious implications for national security. Her private server contained classified information, which was later determined to be present in at least 671 emails. This included information deemed Secret and Top Secret. The use of a private server left this sensitive information vulnerable to hacking, potentially compromising national security.

In conclusion, Clinton's use of a private server was a clear breach of security protocols, and her failure to follow established procedures left her emails vulnerable to hacking, posing a significant risk to the security of sensitive and classified information.

Frequently asked questions