Russia's Ukraine Invasion: Violating International Law And Sovereignty

Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was a violation of international law and has been called a crime of aggression. The invasion was also a breach of the UN Charter, which sets out the conditions under which UN member states can legally go to war.

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter states that all members of the UN must:

> refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine was also a violation of international agreements that it is a party to, including the 1975 Helsinki Final Act, the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, and the Minsk agreements.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine violated the prohibition on the use of force embodied in Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter

Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was deemed illegal as it violated the prohibition on the use of force as outlined in Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. This article stipulates that all UN members must "refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state". The invasion also breached Article 2(3) of the Charter, which requires members to resolve international disputes through peaceful means.

The UN Charter, established in 1945, is considered one of the most significant documents of international law. Russia's violation of Article 2(4) is particularly egregious as this principle is viewed as the cornerstone of the modern international legal system.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine was preceded by a significant military buildup near its border with Ukraine, which began in March and April 2021. Despite Russia's denial of any intention to invade, the US released intelligence in December 2021, including satellite images, indicating Russian troops and equipment near the Ukrainian border. On February 23, 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" in Ukraine, citing the need to protect Russian-speakers in Ukraine and claiming that Ukraine posed a threat to Russia.

The invasion of Ukraine triggered swift responses from the international community, including condemnation, sanctions, and arming Ukraine. The UN Security Council attempted to pass a resolution demanding Russia's withdrawal, but Russia vetoed it. The UN General Assembly, however, overwhelmingly voted to condemn the invasion and demanded Russia's immediate withdrawal.

The invasion has also been called a "crime of aggression" under international criminal law and has resulted in investigations and proceedings at the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice.

Russia's actions also violated the 1975 Helsinki Final Act, in which the USSR promised not to violate the territorial integrity of other signees

Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 violated international law, including the Charter of the United Nations. The invasion has been called a crime of aggression under international criminal law and has been condemned by the international community.

One of the many international agreements that Russia's actions violated was the 1975 Helsinki Final Act, also known as the Helsinki Accords or Helsinki Declaration. This agreement was signed by 35 nations, including the United States, Canada, and all European countries except Albania and Andorra, at the conclusion of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) in Helsinki, Finland. The Act addressed a range of global issues and had a significant impact on Cold War tensions and US-Soviet relations.

The Helsinki Final Act was divided into four "baskets," with the first basket encompassing ten principles related to political, military, and territorial issues. This included a commitment to respect the territorial integrity of states and refrain from the threat or use of force against other signees. By invading Ukraine, Russia violated this commitment and broke the promise made by the USSR in the Helsinki Final Act.

The violation of the Helsinki Final Act by Russia has been noted by various parties, including the Deputy Prime Minister of Slovenia, who condemned the Russian Federation's aggression as a blatant breach of the Act and its emphasis on the inviolability of borders in Europe. This act of aggression has far-reaching consequences and underscores the importance of upholding territorial integrity and international law.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has had devastating impacts on civilians, disrupted economies, and compromised global security. The international community's response to this violation of territorial integrity has included condemnation, sanctions, and efforts to provide humanitarian aid and military support to Ukraine.

Russia's invasion constituted a crime of aggression under international criminal law

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been deemed a crime of aggression under international criminal law. This is because the invasion violated the prohibition on the use of force embodied in Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, which is considered the key legal principle of the modern era.

The UN Charter sets out the conditions under which UN member states may legally resort to war or the use of armed force. As a member of the UN, Russia is bound by this Charter.

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter stipulates that all members shall:

> "refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."

Additionally, Article 2(3) requires all member states to:

> "settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered."

The only exceptions to this are self-defence and an authorization by the Security Council.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been viewed as a violation of these principles, particularly Article 2(4)'s prohibition on the "use of force" against other states.

Legal experts and scholars have rejected Russia's justification for the invasion, which include claims of self-defence and the need for humanitarian intervention. These arguments have been deemed unfounded and used as a pretext for the invasion.

Russia's actions have also been deemed a crime of aggression under Article 8bis(1) of the Rome Statute, which defines an "act of aggression" as:

> "the invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State."

The Rome Statute created the International Criminal Court (ICC), which has the power to prosecute crimes of aggression. However, there are procedural obstacles to holding Russian officials accountable, as Russia is not a member of the ICC and has veto power over UN Security Council resolutions.

Despite these challenges, the international community's response to Russia's invasion has been robust, including economic sanctions and the provision of military aid to Ukraine. The invasion has also been widely condemned by the UN General Assembly, which passed a resolution demanding that Russia "immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces from the territory of Ukraine."

Russia's actions violated the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which Russia, the US, and the UK agreed to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine

Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 violated international law and the country's territorial integrity. One of the key instruments assuring Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity was the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which Russia, the US, and the UK signed.

The Budapest Memorandum was signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary, on December 5, 1994. It provided security assurances to Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan regarding their accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The memorandum prohibited its signatories from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against these three countries, except in self-defence or in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

The three nuclear powers, Russia, the US, and the UK, confirmed their recognition of the independence and sovereignty of Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, and agreed to respect their existing borders. They also agreed to refrain from threatening or using force against the territorial integrity or political independence of these countries and to seek immediate Security Council action if they became victims of aggression.

By invading Ukraine in 2022, Russia violated the Budapest Memorandum, particularly the provisions related to respecting Ukraine's independence, sovereignty, and existing borders. This invasion also breached the 1975 Helsinki Final Act, the Minsk agreements, and the 1997 Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership.

The consequences of Russia's violation of the Budapest Memorandum have been significant. The US, the UK, and other countries have provided military aid, financing, and training to Ukraine, as well as imposing sanctions on Russia. However, they have stopped short of direct intervention, such as imposing no-fly zones, to avoid being dragged into a war with Russia.

The violation of the Budapest Memorandum has far-reaching repercussions beyond a breach of international law and Ukraine's territorial integrity. It weakens the credibility of major power security assurances, undermines the nuclear non-proliferation regime, and dampens prospects for future disarmament. It may also trigger a renewed interest in nuclear weapons among states seeking to safeguard their sovereignty and independence.

Russia's invasion also violated the Minsk agreements, which are a pair of Ceasefire Agreements signed by Russia and Ukraine relating to the conflict between the countries that began in 2014

Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 violated international law and the UN Charter. The invasion has also been called a crime of aggression under international criminal law and some countries' domestic criminal codes.

The Minsk agreements covered four main areas: security, humanitarian aspects, the economy, and political issues. The security provisions included a ceasefire, the withdrawal of forces and heavy weapons, the disarmament of illegal groups, and the withdrawal of foreign fighters. The humanitarian aspects included the exchange of prisoners and provisions for humanitarian access, while the economic provisions included the establishment of an economic development plan for Donbas and the resumption of economic relations across the line of contact.

The political issues addressed in the Minsk agreements revolved around the status of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, with Ukraine agreeing to undertake constitutional reform to introduce decentralisation and a law on self-government for these regions. The agreements also included provisions for local elections in these regions and an amnesty for participants in the "events" that took place there.

While the Minsk agreements had the virtue of establishing a formal Russian commitment to return the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk to Ukrainian control, the two sides had radically divergent interpretations of how the agreements should be implemented. Moscow presented itself as a mediator in a Ukrainian domestic conflict, arguing that the agreements' implementation had to be discussed on an equal footing between Kyiv, Donetsk, and Luhansk. In contrast, Ukraine insisted that Russia be recognised as a party to the conflict, with specific obligations under the Minsk agreements such as the withdrawal of foreign fighters.

Another key divergence concerned the sequencing of the implementation of the agreements. Moscow wanted decentralisation and local elections to take place first, which would legitimise its proxies in Donbas. Ukraine, on the other hand, prioritised restoring security before implementing the political provisions.

In the end, the Minsk agreements were unable to bring about a lasting resolution to the conflict, and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 put an end to any prospects for their implementation.

Frequently asked questions