Email Contracts: Understanding Applicable Laws

Emails can be legally binding and therefore need to meet the typical requirements of a contract. This means that they must include an offer, acceptance, consideration, mutuality, capacity, and legality.

In the US, emails must also include awareness, and the laws of the jurisdiction in which they are signed.

To avoid creating an email contract, it is important to explicitly state that the email isn't intended to be a contract, for example, by including the term 'subject to contract'.

Offer and Acceptance

For a contract to be legally binding, there are five elements that need to be satisfied. These are:

• Offer – The offer must be specific, complete, capable of acceptance, and made with the intention of being bound by acceptance.
• Acceptance of the offer – Acceptance must be an unqualified assent to an offer, and must not vary the terms of the offer.
• Consideration – This means some type of payment.
• Intention to be legally bound by the contract – In commercial situations, there is a rebuttable presumption that the parties intended their agreement to be legally binding.
• Certainty – There must be certainty as to what is agreed upon by the two parties to the contract.

Email exchanges can form a legally binding contract if these five elements are satisfied. However, it is important to note that not all email exchanges will result in a binding contract. It depends on the content and context of the emails.

To ensure that an email exchange is legally binding, the following criteria must be met:

• The email must be sent to the correct person and correctly express the terms of the contract.
• The recipient of the email must reply and express that they agree with the terms of the agreement.
• There must be an exchange of things of value between the parties, such as goods, services, money, or other things of value (provided they are legal).
• The parties must express their intention to be legally bound by the agreement, making the contract more enforceable.

It is important to note that there are some restrictions on using emails as legally binding contracts. For example, some jurisdictions require that certain contracts be established in writing and signed by all parties involved. Additionally, email exchanges may contain misunderstandings or ambiguous language, making it difficult to rely on them as contracts. To ensure the enforceability of email contracts, it is important to check the electronic signature laws in your jurisdiction and ensure that all parties' email servers are secure.

Legality

In the US, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) and the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign) both state that electronic communications can constitute legally binding contracts. This means that emails can be legally binding, as long as they meet the standard requirements of a contract.

In the UK, emails can also be legally binding, as long as they meet the usual requirements of a contract.

For a contract to be legally binding, it must contain the following elements:

• Offer and acceptance: One party must make an offer that another party accepts.
• Consideration: Something of value must be exchanged.
• Intention to be legally bound: Both parties must intend to enter into a contract.
• Contractual capacity: Both parties must have the ability to understand that they are entering into a contract.

In the US, two additional elements are required for a contract to be legally binding:

• Awareness: Both parties must be aware of what they are getting into.
• Legality: US contracts are governed by the laws of the jurisdiction they are signed in. If federal and state laws differ, the Contract Clause of the US Constitution takes precedence.

To avoid creating an email contract, one can explicitly state that the email is not intended to be a contract by including the term 'subject to contract', which suggests that a separate contract needs to be created for the agreement to become legally enforceable.

Additionally, it is important to note that not all emails will be considered legally binding. For example, if an email indicates that the discussion is preliminary, exploratory, or brainstorming, it will not be considered a legal agreement. Furthermore, if there is a lack of clear acceptance or if the law or company policy requires a physical signature, an email alone may not be sufficient to form a binding contract.

It is also worth noting that the enforceability of an electronic signature generally requires the presence of the signature in connection with the electronic record and the intent of the parties to be bound by the signature. For instance, inserting one's name at the end of an email or including a firm's name is typically enough to meet the requirements of the statutes.

In conclusion, while emails can be legally binding in both the US and the UK, it is important to carefully consider the language and intent of each email to avoid unintentionally forming a contract.

Consideration/Agreement

Consideration is a crucial aspect of contract law, and it refers to the exchange of things of value between the parties involved. In a legally binding contract, all parties will receive something of value, which can include goods, services, money, or other things of value, provided they are legal. This exchange of value is essential to the formation of a valid contract and is often referred to as the "bargain" or "meeting of the minds" between the parties.

In the context of email contracts, consideration can be demonstrated through the email chain. For example, if one party offers to provide a service for a set fee and the other party accepts and agrees to make the payment, this would constitute consideration. The emails would outline the terms of the agreement, including the service to be provided and the corresponding payment, thus satisfying the requirement of consideration.

It is important to note that the consideration must be something of value recognised by law. For instance, agreeing to perform an illegal act would not constitute valid consideration, and the contract would be deemed invalid.

Additionally, the consideration must be definite and certain. Vague or ambiguous statements about the exchange of value may not be sufficient to establish a valid contract. The terms of the agreement, including the consideration, should be clear and understood by all parties involved.

When drafting email contracts, it is crucial to ensure that the consideration is clearly stated and agreed upon by all parties. This helps to reduce the risk of misunderstandings or disputes arising from ambiguous language.

Furthermore, it is worth noting that the consideration does not need to be equal in value between the parties. As long as something of value is exchanged, the contract can be considered valid, even if the values exchanged are not equivalent.

In summary, consideration is a vital component of a legally binding contract, including those formed via email communication. It represents the exchange of value between the parties and must be clearly stated and agreed upon to ensure the validity and enforceability of the contract.

Capacity

In the context of contract law, the term "capacity" refers to an individual's legal ability to enter into a contract. In simpler terms, it's about whether a person is in the right mental state and has the legal competence to commit to a legally binding document.

• Protecting vulnerable parties: It ensures that individuals who may lack the ability to fully comprehend the terms and consequences of a contract, such as minors, those with mental illnesses, or those with conditions like dementia, aren't taken advantage of.
• Ensuring voluntary consent: Capacity guarantees that parties entering into a contract do so willingly and with consent, thus maintaining the integrity of contractual agreements.
• Upholding legality: Contracts entered into by parties without the required capacity may be void or voidable, meaning they may not be enforceable in a court of law.

In the UK, the age of majority is 18 years old, and individuals below this age are generally considered minors. Minors typically lack the capacity to contract as they may not fully understand the terms and consequences of the agreement.

Additionally, individuals must have the ability to understand the nature and consequences of the contract. Mental incapacity, such as severe cognitive impairments, can affect one's capacity to contract.

An individual who signs a contract while under the influence of drugs or alcohol may also impair their ability to understand the terms and consequences, potentially rendering the contract voidable.

The law recognises three categories of individuals who lack the capacity to contract:

• Minors (those under the age of 18 in most states)
• Individuals with psychological disabilities
• Intoxicated persons

If any of these individuals enter into a contract, the agreement might be considered voidable by them, protecting them from being forced to go through with a deal that takes advantage of their lack of understanding or impaired state.

Mutuality

In court, a contract with an option to fail to perform the listed obligations will typically be voided due to a lack of mutuality of obligation. The lack of consideration to both parties is another reason that this type of contract would be voided. If one party has the power to cancel or void a contract, no legal repercussions exist for failing to deliver on the promises made.

When drafting and signing a contract, all involved parties must limit the discretion to not perform on the agreed-upon terms or cancel the contract to prevent it from being invalidated. A court will typically find the existence of mutuality of obligation when the terms to cancel the contract depend on an event or condition outside the control of the party seeking to cancel.

For example, if a farmer has a contract with a third-party watering service, he might have a legal right to cancel one instance of that service if the contract included conditions based on rainfall in the area. Since the amount of rainfall is outside the control of the farmer, including this reason to cancel could still be considered mutuality of obligation. However, if the contract outlined the farmer's right to cancel the service for any reason before the term of the contract was up, this would not be considered mutuality of obligation.

When two parties sign a contract, this action represents a mutual obligation to one another. Without the obligation, a court will not consider a contract to be a legally binding agreement. However, there are several exceptions to the requirement for mutuality. The requirement of mutuality of obligation only exists in bilateral contracts, or contracts that involve two or more parties making promises to one another. When a contract is unilateral or outlines a promise in exchange for an act, mutuality is not required.

In the Philippines, the Supreme Court has struck down contracts that make obligations dependent solely on one party's will. Specifically, the Court has found that contracts allowing a lessee to stay "as long as needed" or allowing a bank to unilaterally increase interest rates violate the principle of mutuality and are invalid.

Frequently asked questions