The Evolution Of Law: Nuberge Code's Legal Journey

The Nuremberg Code, a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation, was formulated in August 1947 in Nuremberg, Germany, by a panel of American judges. The code was developed during the trial of 23 Nazi doctors accused of conducting inhumane experiments on humans in concentration camps during World War II. The principles of the code were included in the judgement of the trial, which took place between December 1946 and August 1947, but it was not specifically referenced, and so its legal force was not well established. The code has never been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association.

The Nuremberg Code was created after World War II

The Nuremberg Code, a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation, was created in August 1947 in Nuremberg, Germany. It was developed by a panel of American judges during the trials of 23 Nazi doctors accused of conducting inhumane and unethical experiments on humans during World War II. The trials, known as the Doctors' Trial, began in December 1946 and ended in July 1947. The judges in this case were Walter B. Beals, Harold L. Sebring, and Johnson T. Crawford, with Victor C. Swearingen as an alternate judge. The chief prosecutor was James M. McHaney.

The creation of the Nuremberg Code was prompted by the argument of the accused Nazi doctors that their experiments did not differ from those performed before the war, and that there was no law differentiating between legal and illegal experiments. This concern led to the submission of a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes, outlining six points for legitimate medical research. This early version of the Code, known as the Memorandum, stated that explicit voluntary consent from patients was required for human experimentation.

The Memorandum's points were later revised and expanded to ten points, which became known as the Nuremberg Code. These ten points include principles such as informed consent, absence of coercion, properly formulated scientific experimentation, and beneficence towards experiment participants. The Code was included in the verdict of the trial and has since become significant beyond its original context, influencing global human rights and serving as a prototype for ethical codes worldwide.

While the Nuremberg Code has not been officially adopted as law by any nation, it has had a massive influence on the ethical conduct of medical research and human experimentation. It is considered a landmark document in medical and research ethics, ensuring the rights of subjects in medical research and protecting human subjects in clinical trials. The Code's principles have been incorporated into various international laws and guidelines, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects.

It is a set of 10 principles for ethical human experimentation

The Nuremberg Code is a set of 10 principles for ethical human experimentation. It was formulated in August 1947 in Nuremberg, Germany, by American judges overseeing the trial of Nazi doctors accused of inhumane and unethical experimentation on humans during World War II.

The 10 principles are:

• The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent and be able to exercise free power of choice without any form of force, fraud, deceit, duress, or coercion. The person should also have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the experiment to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
• The experiment should yield fruitful results for the good of society, which cannot be obtained by other methods, and should not be random or unnecessary.
• The experiment should be designed based on the results of animal experimentation and knowledge of the natural history of the disease or problem under study. The anticipated results should justify the performance of the experiment.
• The experiment should be conducted to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
• No experiment should be conducted if there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur, except perhaps when experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
• The degree of risk taken should never exceed the humanitarian importance of the problem the experiment aims to solve.
• Proper preparations and adequate facilities should be provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
• The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons with the highest degree of skill and care required through all stages of the experiment.
• During the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to end their participation if they reach a physical or mental state where continuation seems impossible.
• During the experiment, the scientist in charge must terminate the experiment at any stage if they have probable cause to believe that continuation is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

The Nuremberg Code has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association. However, it is considered a significant document in the history of clinical research ethics due to its influence on global human rights and the development of ethical guidelines for human subject research.

The code was formulated in response to Nazi human experiments

The Nuremberg Code is a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation. It was formulated in response to Nazi human experiments conducted during World War II, which were exposed during the Nuremberg trials.

During the mid-1920s, German physicians, often proponents of racial hygiene, were accused of unethical medical practices by the public and the medical community. Racial hygiene was supported by the German government to promote an Aryan race. This ideology merged with National Socialism, which used biology to achieve its goal of racial purity, a core concept in Nationalist ideology. By 1942, the Nazi party had the support of over 38,000 German physicians, who aided in the implementation of medical programs such as the Sterilization Law.

After World War II, the Nuremberg trials were held to hold members of the Nazi party accountable for war crimes. The trials began on November 20, 1945, in Nuremberg, Germany, and focused on physicians who conducted inhumane and unethical human experiments in concentration camps, as well as those involved in the sterilization of German citizens.

During the trials, several accused German doctors argued that their experiments were similar to those conducted before the war, and that there was no law differentiating between legal and illegal experiments. This prompted Dr. Andrew Ivy and Dr. Leo Alexander, who worked with the prosecution, to submit a memorandum outlining six points for legitimate medical research.

The Nuremberg Code, consisting of ten principles, was formulated in response to these concerns. It was included in the tribunal's decision in the case of the United States v. Karl Brandt et al., delivered on August 19, 1947. The Code emphasizes the importance of voluntary, competent, informed, and understanding consent from human subjects. It outlines guidelines for permissible medical experimentation, stressing the need to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects.

The Code has had a significant impact on global human rights and clinical research ethics. While it has not been officially adopted as law by any nation, it has influenced regulations and guidelines to ensure the ethical treatment of human research subjects. It set a precedent for all future codes of ethical practice and served as a cornerstone of clinical research and bioethics.

The code has influenced global human rights and medical ethics

The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation. It was created by the court in U.S. v Brandt, one of the Subsequent Nuremberg trials that were held after the Second World War. The Code has had a massive influence on global human rights and medical ethics.

The Code is considered by some to be the most important document in the history of clinical research ethics. This is because it has influenced the creation of similar codes of ethical practice across the globe. The ten points of the Code outline the requirements for ethical human experimentation, including the requirement for voluntary informed consent from patients. This idea of free or informed consent has also served as the basis for International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects proposed by the World Health Organization.

In the United States, the Code and the related Declaration of Helsinki influenced the drafting of regulations to ensure the ethical treatment of human research subjects, known as the Common Rule. These regulations are now codified in Part 46 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations and are enforced by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).

In 1966, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the United Nations. This covenant prohibits experiments conducted without the "free consent to medical or scientific experimentation" of the subject. As of September 2019, the Covenant has 173 state parties.

In addition, the Nuremberg Code has been applied in criminal and civil litigation in the Federal Courts of the United States. In 1995, Judge Sandra Beckwith ruled that the Code may be applied in such cases. This further demonstrates the influence of the Code on legal and ethical standards for human experimentation.

The Nuremberg Code has never been adopted as law by any nation

The Nuremberg Code, a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation, was created by the court in U.S. v Brandt, one of the Subsequent Nuremberg trials that were held after the Second World War. The Code was articulated as part of the court's verdict in the trial. However, it has never been adopted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association.

The Code includes ten points, given in the section of the judges' verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments". These points outline the ethical standards that must be met for human experimentation to be considered permissible. The first point, for example, states that "the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential". This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent and should be able to exercise free power of choice without any form of coercion.

The Nuremberg Code has had a significant influence on global human rights and clinical research ethics, despite not being adopted as law. In the United States, it influenced the drafting of regulations to ensure the ethical treatment of human research subjects, known as the Common Rule. The Code has also been described as a "prototype for all future codes of ethical practice across the globe".

In addition, the Nuremberg Code has been applied in criminal and civil litigation in the Federal Courts of the United States. In 1995, Judge Sandra Beckwith ruled that the Code could be applied in such cases. This further highlights the importance and relevance of the Code, even if it has not been formally adopted as law.

While the Nuremberg Code has not been officially accepted as law, its principles have had a significant impact on the ethical framework for human experimentation and clinical research. It continues to serve as a cornerstone of clinical research and bioethics, providing a foundation for the protection of human subjects in research.

Frequently asked questions