The Complexities Of Abortion Lawmaking

Abortion is a highly debated topic, with many people having strong opinions on the matter. However, it is important to recognise that abortion laws are a human rights issue and not just a matter of opinion. Restricting access to safe and legal abortions violates the human rights of women and people who can get pregnant, particularly those from marginalised communities. Everyone has the right to bodily autonomy and reproductive autonomy, and criminalising or restricting abortion takes away that right, often forcing people to resort to unsafe abortions that can have fatal consequences. Therefore, it is essential that laws relating to abortion respect, protect, and fulfil the human rights of pregnant individuals, rather than putting them at risk.

Abortion laws should be decided by those who can get pregnant, not by others

However, there are still many barriers that prevent people from seeking abortions, including criminalisation, social stigma, and intersectional discrimination and marginalisation. These barriers can be found in laws, policies, and social attitudes that restrict abortion access and create a negative narrative around it.

The criminalisation of abortion has a detrimental impact on those who are already marginalised, as they face additional obstacles to accessing safe abortion services. This includes people on low incomes, refugees, migrants, LGBTIQA+ individuals, and racialised and Indigenous people.

Furthermore, restrictive abortion laws do not prevent abortions from happening. Instead, they push people towards unsafe procedures, increasing the risk of maternal mortality and morbidity. According to the World Health Organization, complications from pregnancy and childbirth are the leading cause of death for girls and young women aged 15 to 19.

The decision to have an abortion or not should be made by the pregnant person, without interference or unreasonable restrictions from the state or third parties. This is supported by international human rights law and relevant jurisprudence, which establish that denying access to abortion is a form of discrimination and jeopardises a range of human rights.

By involving those who can get pregnant in the decision-making process, abortion laws can be shaped to protect the rights, health, and well-being of pregnant individuals. This includes ensuring universal access to safe and legal abortion services, addressing social and economic barriers, and providing support and non-judgmental care.

Additionally, the involvement of those who can get pregnant in shaping abortion laws can help to reduce the stigma surrounding abortion and improve access to accurate information and education. It empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their reproductive health and ensures that laws are created with the needs and perspectives of those directly affected at the forefront.

In conclusion, abortion laws should be decided by those who can get pregnant to uphold their human rights, ensure access to safe and legal abortion services, and address the social, economic, and political barriers that hinder reproductive autonomy.

Abortion laws should not be influenced by religion or morality

The separation of church and state is a fundamental tenet of a secular democracy. When it comes to abortion, religious conservatives often perceive it as murder and a threat to social, moral, and religious values. However, abortion laws should be based on human rights and respect for individual autonomy, rather than religious doctrine. A woman's right to control her own body and make decisions about her future should not be dictated by religious beliefs.

Furthermore, the influence of religion on abortion attitudes and behavior varies across different faiths and individuals. While some religions may doctrinally disapprove of abortion, it is important to respect the diversity of religious and non-religious perspectives. The decision to have an abortion is a personal one, and individuals should be free to make choices based on their own beliefs and circumstances.

Additionally, abortion laws should not be influenced by moral judgments about the morality of abortion. Views on the morality of abortion vary widely and are often shaped by religious affiliation and political leanings. However, moral judgments should not be the basis for legislation that affects the lives and health of individuals. Instead, abortion laws should be informed by scientific evidence and a commitment to protecting the rights and well-being of all people.

Moreover, the criminalization and restriction of abortion have negative consequences, including increased unsafe abortions, higher maternal mortality and morbidity, and violations of human rights. By interfering with a woman's right to make decisions about her own body, abortion laws influenced by religion or morality can lead to harmful outcomes and limit a woman's autonomy.

Finally, it is essential to recognize the impact of abortion stigma, which is often shaped by religious and moral beliefs. Stigma can cause guilt, shame, and isolation for women who have had or are considering abortions. It is crucial to address abortion stigma and create a supportive environment that respects women's decisions and empowers them to make choices based on their own values and circumstances.

In conclusion, abortion laws should be based on human rights, scientific evidence, and respect for individual autonomy. Religious and moral influences can lead to laws that infringe on a woman's right to control her own body and make decisions about her future. By separating church and state and prioritizing human rights, we can create a more inclusive and just society that respects the diversity of beliefs and values.

Abortion laws should be based on scientific evidence, not emotions

Abortion laws are a highly debated topic, with strong opinions on both sides of the argument. However, it is important that these laws are based on scientific evidence and not driven by emotions.

The impact of abortion laws on mental health

Scientific research has shown that having an abortion is not linked to mental health issues. In fact, restricting access to safe and legal abortions can cause harm to mental health. Studies have found that people who are denied abortions experience worse physical and mental health outcomes than those who receive them. The Turnaway Study, a landmark analysis of abortion, found that women who had an abortion did not report more negative emotions or suicidal thoughts than women who were denied an abortion. This study also showed that the most common emotion felt after an abortion was relief.

The impact of abortion on women's lives

Abortion laws should be based on scientific evidence regarding their impact on women's lives. For example, in countries where abortion is restricted, women are forced to resort to unsafe abortions, which can lead to fatal consequences such as maternal deaths and disabilities. On the other hand, in places where abortion is legal and accessible, people can obtain abortions safely and without risk. Additionally, abortion laws have a greater impact on marginalised communities, as they face social, economic, and political conditions that hinder their ability to exercise reproductive autonomy.

The role of international human rights bodies

International human rights bodies have played an important role in calling for progressive abortion law reform. These bodies have recognised that denying women, girls, and other pregnant people access to abortion is a form of discrimination and jeopardises a range of human rights. As a result, they have consistently called for the decriminalisation of abortion and the full realisation of sexual and reproductive rights.

The history of abortion laws

The history of abortion laws is complex and influenced by various factors. Initially, restrictions on abortion were introduced to protect women's health, as abortion methods were dangerous and could be life-threatening. However, as abortion methods became safer, the laws shifted towards punitive and deterrent purposes, as well as protecting fetal life over women's lives. Today, restrictive abortion laws are often influenced by religious and moral beliefs, rather than scientific evidence.

The impact of abortion on society

Abortion laws can have a significant impact on society as a whole. For example, in countries where abortion is restricted, there may be an increase in illegal and unsafe abortions, which can lead to a range of social, emotional, and mental health problems for both women and children. Additionally, the stigmatisation of abortion can create barriers to accessing safe and legal abortions, as people may feel compelled to disclose their pregnancy to others and seek out unsafe alternatives.

Abortion laws should not be restricted by legislative or judicial interference

Legislative restrictions on abortion often result in more illegal and unsafe abortions, which drive higher maternal mortality and morbidity. These restrictions do not prevent abortions but push them underground, increasing the risk of unsafe procedures and police reports or prosecutions. The rate of unsafe abortions is nearly 45 times higher in countries with highly restrictive abortion laws compared to those where abortion is legal and unrestricted. Restrictive abortion policies force pregnant individuals, especially those from marginalised communities, to seek unsafe and clandestine abortion services, putting their physical and mental well-being at risk.

Judicial interference in abortion laws can also create barriers to accessing safe and legal abortions. Vague and contradictory language in abortion exceptions, as well as cumbersome requirements, hinder access to abortion care. For example, mental health exceptions are rare, despite mental health conditions accounting for over 20% of pregnancy-related deaths. Additionally, law enforcement involvement required in cases of rape and incest often prevents survivors from accessing abortion services.

Legislative and judicial restrictions on abortion infringe on the right to bodily autonomy and reproductive autonomy. Everyone, especially women, girls, and people who can become pregnant, has the right to control their fertility and make decisions about their bodies and future. Restrictive abortion laws and policies, such as criminalisation, social stigma, and intersectional discrimination, create barriers to accessing safe and legal abortions, violating these fundamental human rights.

Furthermore, legislative and judicial interference in abortion laws can deter healthcare providers from practicing in states with restrictive abortion laws, exacerbating disparities in access to obstetric care and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Healthcare providers may face the risk of prosecution, monetary fines, and loss of their professional licenses if they provide abortion care that does not adhere to restrictive laws.

In conclusion, legislative and judicial interference in abortion laws restricts access to safe and legal abortions, endangering the health and lives of pregnant individuals. Removing legal restrictions and ensuring universal access to safe abortion services is essential to protecting the human rights and well-being of those who can become pregnant.

Abortion laws should protect the bodily autonomy and privacy of those who can get pregnant

Abortion laws that protect bodily autonomy and privacy are essential to ensuring that people who can become pregnant have control over their own bodies and futures. It is a matter of human rights and public health. In places where abortion is legal, accessible, and carries less stigma, people can obtain abortions safely and without risk. However, in places where abortion is stigmatized, criminalized, or restricted, people are forced to resort to unsafe abortions, which can lead to fatal consequences such as maternal deaths and disabilities.

The criminalization of abortion creates a "chilling effect," deterring healthcare providers from providing abortions due to fear of legal consequences. This results in a lack of safe and accessible abortion services, especially for marginalized communities. Additionally, the criminalization of abortion is often used as a tool to control women, people of color, and people living on low incomes, perpetuating stereotypes and second-class status.

Reproductive autonomy is critical to health, life, and economic and family well-being. Abortion should be safe, healthy, and supported. Pregnancy and childbirth carry significant health risks, and maternal mortality is rising, with a disproportionate impact on marginalized communities. By protecting bodily autonomy and privacy, abortion laws can help address these health disparities and ensure that people who can become pregnant have the right to control their own bodies and make decisions about their futures.

International human rights law and jurisprudence support the conclusion that decisions about abortion belong solely to the pregnant person, without interference from the state or third parties. The right to reproductive autonomy is deeply grounded in constitutional and human rights, including the right to privacy, liberty, equality, and non-discrimination. By guaranteeing these rights, abortion laws can protect the bodily autonomy and privacy of those who can become pregnant.

Frequently asked questions