Hillary's Abortion Law Stance: What's Her Take?

Hillary Clinton has been a vocal supporter of abortion rights for women. She has defended Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to choose, stating that abortion should be safe, legal and rare. Clinton has also expressed support for parental notification and family planning, and has voted against partial-birth abortion bans. During her presidential campaign, Clinton faced criticism from anti-abortion advocates for her support of late-term abortions, with some accusing her of supporting unlimited abortion on demand. Clinton has maintained that her position is rooted in the Constitution and a woman's right to make personal decisions about her health and family.

Hillary Clinton's stance on Roe v. Wade

Hillary Clinton has been a vocal supporter of abortion rights, and has criticised the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, calling it a "step backward" for women's rights and human rights. In a statement, Clinton wrote, "Most Americans believe the decision to have a child is one of the most sacred decisions there is, and that such decisions should remain between patients and their doctors."

Clinton has also expressed concern over the extreme power that the ruling could give the government over women's personal decisions and bodies. She believes that the right to abortion is a fundamental constitutional right that should be protected. In an interview, she said, "I support Roe v. Wade because I think it is an important [...] statement about the importance of a woman making this most difficult decision with consultation by whom she chooses: her doctor, her faith, her family."

Clinton's stance on Roe v. Wade is aligned with her pro-choice position, which she has maintained throughout her political career. She has emphasised that being pro-choice does not equate to being pro-abortion. Instead, she believes that being pro-choice means trusting women to make their own decisions regarding their bodies and their families.

Clinton has also acknowledged that there may be circumstances in which the government should limit choice, such as in the case of late-term abortions or partial-birth abortions. She has stated that she can support a ban on these procedures as long as the health and life of the mother are protected.

In addition to her statements, Clinton has taken action to support abortion rights. After the overturning of Roe v. Wade, she encouraged people to financially support women's abortion rights through organisations such as Planned Parenthood Action Fund, NARAL, and EMILY's List.

Clinton's views on late-term abortions

Hillary Clinton has stated that she supports a woman's right to choose to have an abortion, and that she would agree with late-term abortion bans if provisions were included for the health of the mother. She has also said that she can support a ban on late-term abortions, including partial-birth abortions, so long as the health and life of the mother are protected. Clinton has emphasised that being pro-choice is not the same as being pro-abortion, and that being pro-choice is about trusting the individual to make the right decision for herself and her family.

Clinton has also said that she would hate to see the government interfering with the decision to have a late-term abortion, as these are often due to medical necessity. However, existing data does not support her claim that late-term abortions are mostly due to medical reasons. According to the Guttmacher Institute, only 1.2% of abortions in the United States take place after 20 weeks' gestation, and there is no definitive information on how many of these are due to medical necessity.

Clinton has also stated that she supports parental notification in the case of abortion, unless the family is so dysfunctional that notification is not appropriate.

Clinton's comments on partial-birth abortion

Hillary Clinton has been criticised by some for her stance on abortion, particularly late-term abortions. Clinton has stated that she supports a woman's right to choose, and that she can support a ban on late-term abortions, including partial-birth abortions, so long as the health and life of the mother is protected. She has also said that being pro-choice is not being pro-abortion.

Clinton has also emphasised that late-term abortions are rare and done only in cases when the woman's life is in danger or in cases of extreme fetal abnormality. She has shared stories of women who have had to make this difficult decision, and stressed that these women never had a choice.

Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, also vetoed a bill in 1996 that would have banned partial-birth abortions. He said that this bill would have hurt women and families who are "trying to build families and [...] trying to strengthen their families". He emphasised that this was not about the pro-choice/pro-life debate, but about protecting the lives and health of a small number of women and families.

Clinton's support for women's autonomy

Hillary Clinton has been a vocal supporter of women's autonomy, particularly when it comes to issues surrounding abortion. She has consistently advocated for a woman's right to choose and has emphasised the importance of keeping abortion safe, legal, and rare. In her own words, "being pro-choice is not being pro-abortion. Being pro-choice is trusting the individual to make the right decision for herself and her family, and not entrusting that decision to anyone wearing the authority of government in any regard."

Clinton's commitment to women's autonomy was further highlighted during her presidential campaign in 2016. She boldly defended Planned Parenthood and Roe v. Wade, stating that she would defend women's rights to make their own healthcare decisions. Clinton's stance on abortion was met with criticism from anti-abortion advocates, who claimed that her position was "radically out of touch with the American people." However, her unwavering support for women's rights resonated with many, especially young voters, who saw her as a champion of reproductive freedom.

Clinton's stance on abortion extends beyond domestic policy. She has also spoken out against forced abortions in other countries, such as China, where couples are still coerced into aborting babies conceived outside the state plan. Clinton's commitment to women's autonomy, both domestically and internationally, underscores her belief in the importance of giving women the power to make their own choices and decisions regarding their bodies and healthcare.

Clinton's views on abortion in China

Hillary Clinton has been a vocal supporter of abortion rights in the US, particularly in the context of the threat to Roe v. Wade. During the 2016 presidential debates, Clinton made a statement regarding her experience visiting countries where governments forced women to have abortions or bear children, specifically mentioning China's historical policies. However, Clinton's claim that forced abortions are a thing of the past in China has been disputed by sources, including human rights advocates.

In the final presidential debate, Clinton stated, "I've been to countries where governments either forced women to have abortions like they used to do in China or forced women to bear children like they used to do in Romania." This statement reflects Clinton's recognition of the historical coercive reproductive policies implemented by certain countries, including China.

However, it is important to note that despite China's shift from a one-child policy to a two-child policy, reports suggest that forced abortions remain an issue. Reggie Littlejohn, the head of Women's Rights Without Frontiers, contradicted Clinton's claim, stating that forced abortions are still occurring in China. Littlejohn highlighted cases where couples were forced to choose between abortion and severe consequences, such as losing their jobs or facing hefty fines.

According to sources, the underlying policy of "Planned Births" remains intact, and Chinese leaders, rather than individuals, continue to determine the country's birth rate. This policy, initiated by Chairman Mao in the 1950s, has resulted in coercive methods such as fines, imprisonment, forced abortions, and revocation of governmental support for non-compliant couples.

While Clinton's comments on China's historical practices are accurate, the country's current situation regarding forced abortions contradicts her implication that these practices are no longer prevalent. Human rights advocates and reports from organisations like the BBC indicate that China's transition to a two-child policy has not eradicated coercive reproductive policies and forced abortions.

Clinton's stance on abortion laws in the US context aligns with her support for women's reproductive rights and her warnings about the threat to Roe v. Wade under a conservative Supreme Court. However, her comments on China's current status regarding forced abortions appear to be outdated or inaccurate, given the evidence presented by human rights organisations and advocates.

Frequently asked questions