Rebellion: The Only Option Against Tyrannical Laws

The phrase when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty is often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, although it has not been found in his writings. It captures some of the ideas that Jefferson expressed in the Declaration of Independence, such as the right and duty of the people to throw off a government that is evinc [ing] a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism. The phrase has been used on merchandise such as t-shirts, stickers, and flags, often with patriotic American imagery.

Thomas Jefferson's legacy

Thomas Jefferson was a prominent figure in the American Revolution and the founding of the United States. He is often remembered for his contributions to the Declaration of Independence, which articulated the ideals and principles that shaped the new nation. One such principle, encapsulated in the quote, "When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty," reflects Jefferson's belief in the right and duty of the people to resist unjust government.

While the exact phrase "When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" has not been found in Thomas Jefferson's writings, it captures the spirit of his thoughts expressed in the Declaration of Independence. In the Declaration, Jefferson wrote about the right of the people to "throw off" a government that engages in a "long train of abuses and usurpations" aimed at establishing "absolute Despotism." This idea of resisting tyranny and upholding freedom and liberty has become a cornerstone of American democracy.

Jefferson's legacy is deeply intertwined with his contributions to the foundation of the United States and its democratic ideals. As the primary author of the Declaration of Independence, he gave voice to the aspirations of a young nation seeking independence and self-governance. The Declaration, with its famous assertion that "all men are created equal," laid the groundwork for a nation built on the principles of freedom, liberty, and the inherent rights of its citizens.

Jefferson's belief in the duty to resist tyranny has had a lasting impact on American political thought. It reflects a fundamental tenet of democracy: the notion that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed and that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to secure their rights. This idea has been invoked throughout American history in various movements for social and political change, including the Civil Rights Movement and protests against governmental overreach.

In conclusion, Thomas Jefferson's legacy, as reflected in the misattributed quote, "When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty," underscores his enduring influence on American democracy. His ideas about freedom, liberty, and resistance to tyranny continue to inspire and shape political discourse and activism in the United States and beyond.

Tyranny and rebellion in the modern world

Tyranny and rebellion have been constant themes throughout human history, and they continue to be relevant in the modern world. Today, the notion of tyranny is often associated with dictatorships, where power is concentrated in the hands of a single individual or a small group, and basic freedoms and human rights are restricted. Modern tyrannies are often characterised by a complex power structure that maintains the ruler's power base, involving the military, political parties, and state institutions. These regimes can be challenging to change without resorting to violence, and they pose a difficult dilemma for the international community, which must balance the use of persuasion, soft power, force, or sanctions to address them.

In the modern era, the concept of "soft tyranny" has emerged, first developed by Alexis de Tocqueville in his work "Democracy in America." Soft tyranny is described as a form of government where political leaders operate under restrictions, and citizens influence policymaking through bureaucrats and non-governmental organisations. While it retains democratic virtues, soft tyranny can lead to a form of "orderly, gentle, peaceful slavery," where individuals' critical faculties are lulled by material comforts, and their capacity for revolution is diminished.

The right to rebellion, also known as the right to revolution, is a longstanding concept in political philosophy. It asserts the right or duty of a people to "alter or abolish" a government that acts against their interests, threatens their safety, or infringes upon their natural rights. This idea has been invoked to justify numerous revolutions throughout history, including the American, French, Syrian, Russian, and Iranian Revolutions. The right to rebellion is often seen as a safeguard against tyranny and a means to hold governments accountable to the people they serve.

In the modern world, the complexities of global politics and the availability of powerful weapons have further complicated the issue of tyranny and rebellion. The development of nuclear and other advanced weapons by extremist regimes poses a significant threat to global stability, leading to the development of international policies and agreements aimed at mitigating this danger. Additionally, the nature of modern weapons has made the question of intervening in foreign tyrannies more challenging, as the potential consequences of such interventions can be far-reaching and unpredictable.

The relationship between tyranny and rebellion in the modern world is a complex and evolving dynamic. While the fundamental concepts remain constant, the specific manifestations and responses to tyranny continue to evolve and present new challenges for nations and the international community.

The ethics of rebellion

The phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" is often misattributed to Thomas Jefferson, although it captures some of the ideas he expressed in the Declaration of Independence. The phrase instead first appeared in print in 2006.

On the other hand, rebellion can also be viewed more optimistically as a regenerative and creative force for positive change. This perspective, often associated with Enlightenment liberalism, sees rebellion as a necessary and justifiable means of overthrowing oppressive or unjust regimes and creating a better society in their wake.

Albert Camus, a philosopher often associated with European existentialism, offers a unique perspective on the ethics of rebellion. Camus suggests that rebellion is an act of the total being, a defence of one's possessions, and a manifestation of humanitarianism. He distinguishes rebellion from resentment, arguing that rebellion is an outlet of vitality, while resentment is passive and filled with envy.

The complex nature of rebellion is further highlighted by the variety of responses it elicits from different societies and cultures. For example, the Arab Spring uprisings in Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen received broad political support from the West, while protests in Bahrain and Morocco were met with muted responses.

In conclusion, the ethics of rebellion is a nuanced topic that cannot be easily defined. While rebellion can sometimes be a force for positive change, it can also have destructive consequences. As such, the decision to engage in rebellion should be carefully considered, weighing the potential benefits against the risks of disruption and chaos.

Tyranny and the law

The phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" is often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, although there is no evidence that he ever wrote or said this exact phrase. However, the sentiment expressed in this phrase does capture some of the ideas that Jefferson articulated in the Declaration of Independence.

In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote about the right and duty of the people to overthrow a despotic government:

> "...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government..."

This idea that rebellion against tyranny can be a moral imperative has been a powerful motivator for revolutionary and resistance movements throughout history. It suggests that there are circumstances in which breaking the law is not only justifiable but also a moral obligation.

However, the phrase also raises complex ethical and philosophical questions. For example, who gets to decide when tyranny has become law? And what forms of rebellion or resistance are legitimate or effective?

Furthermore, the phrase and the ideas it conveys can be controversial and subject to different interpretations. Some may interpret it as a call to violent insurrection, while others may see it as a justification for passive resistance or civil disobedience.

Overall, the phrase "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" reflects a tension between the rule of law and the pursuit of justice, and it continues to resonate with people around the world who are struggling against oppressive or unjust systems.

Historical examples of rebellion against tyranny

The idea that "when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" has been attributed to Thomas Jefferson, although it has not been found in his writings. However, the notion that rebellion against tyranny is justified, or even a duty, has a long history in political philosophy and has been used to justify various revolutions throughout the world.

One of the earliest examples of rebellion against tyranny is the overthrow of the Roman monarchy and the establishment of the Roman Republic. This event demonstrated the people's belief in their right to alter or abolish a government that acted against their interests.

Another notable example is the American Revolution, where the colonists' rebellion against British rule was influenced by the ideas of Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Locke's "Two Treatises of Government" defended the right of revolution, arguing that people have a right to life, liberty, and property, and when a government violates these rights, the people have a right, and even a duty, to overthrow it.

The French Revolution of 1789 is another significant example of rebellion against tyranny. The French Constitution of 1793 included a declaration of the rights of man and citizen, stating that "when the government violates the rights of the people, insurrection is for the people, and for every portion thereof, the most sacred of rights and the most indispensable of duties."

In China, the concept of the "Mandate of Heaven" justified the overthrow of the Shang dynasty by the Zhou dynasty (1122-256 BCE). The kings of the Zhou dynasty promulgated the idea that Heaven would bless a just ruler but withdraw its mandate from a despotic one, giving the right to rule to those who would govern best.

During the Middle Ages, the Charters of Sobrarbe in the Pyrenees enshrined the right of rebellion against the king, stating that if the king "should hereafter tyrannise the kingdom against the fueros or liberties, the kingdom should be free to choose another king, even if he were a pagan." This right was later used to thwart royal authority in the kingdoms of Navarre and Aragon.

These are just a few examples of historical rebellions against tyranny, demonstrating the enduring belief in the right to resist oppressive rule.

Frequently asked questions