Laws' Volume: A Challenge To Society's Functioning

In 1788, James Madison wrote about the mischievous effects of a mutable government in Federalist No. 62. He argued that it would be of little benefit to the people if the laws were so voluminous that they could not be read or understood, or if they were constantly changing, such that no one could know what the law was today or what it would be tomorrow. Madison's words highlight the dangers of a government that constantly changes the law to suit its own needs or the needs of its supporters, and how this can ultimately poison the blessings of liberty.

Laws become so voluminous that they cannot be read

This issue of ever-changing and increasingly complex laws has only become more prevalent in the modern era. Laws are often so lengthy and complex that even legislators themselves do not read or debate them before they are passed. This dynamic makes it extremely difficult for citizens to obey the law and can lead to a situation where the law is applied arbitrarily or unevenly.

Furthermore, voluminous laws can be used as a tool by those in power to control and oppress the populace. As Thomas Jefferson warned, "laws are more often than not the tyrant's will, and always so when they violate the rights of the individual." When laws become too cumbersome and complex, they can be used to justify abuse and encroachment on the freedoms and liberties of citizens.

The consequences of voluminous laws are far-reaching and detrimental to a functioning society. They undermine the very purpose of law, which is to provide a clear and understandable framework for governing the behaviour of citizens. When laws become so voluminous that they cannot be read or understood, they lose their effectiveness and legitimacy, leading to a breakdown of social order and trust in the rule of law.

To address this issue, it is essential to streamline and simplify laws, making them accessible and comprehensible to the general public. This can be achieved through various means, such as providing clear and concise summaries of laws, improving legal education, and ensuring that laws are properly debated and scrutinised before they are enacted. By doing so, we can ensure that the law serves its intended purpose of upholding justice and protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens.

Laws are incoherent and cannot be understood

> It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood: if they be repealed or revised before they are promulg[at]ed, or undergo such incessant changes, that no man who knows what the law is to-day, can guess what it will be to-morrow.

When laws become so numerous and complex that they cannot be read or understood, they lose their legitimacy and effectiveness. Citizens cannot be expected to obey laws that they cannot comprehend, and even legislators themselves may pass complicated laws without reading or debating them. This situation undermines liberty and poisons democracy.

Madison's concerns are as relevant today as they were in the 18th century. The proliferation of laws and regulations in modern societies has led to a situation where even legal experts struggle to keep up with the constant changes and updates. The average person has little hope of understanding the full extent of the laws that govern their lives, let alone influencing or shaping them.

The incoherence of laws can also lead to inconsistencies and contradictions. When laws are unclear or ambiguous, they can be interpreted in multiple ways, leading to confusion and uncertainty. This can result in selective enforcement, where certain laws are applied arbitrarily or unevenly, depending on the circumstances or the people involved. This further erodes trust in the legal system and undermines the principle of equality before the law.

In conclusion, when laws become so voluminous that they cannot be understood, it undermines the very foundations of a just and democratic society. Citizens are left in the dark, unable to navigate the complexities of the legal system, and their freedoms are curtailed as a result. It is essential that laws remain coherent, accessible, and understandable to ensure a fair and functioning society.

Laws are repealed or revised before promulgation

In The Federalist (1788), James Madison outlines the "mischievous effects of a mutable government" that constantly changes the law to suit its own needs or the needs of its supporters. One of the effects of a mutable policy is that it "poisons the blessings of liberty itself". Madison argues that it will be of little benefit to the people if the laws are so voluminous that they cannot be read or so incoherent that they cannot be understood. He further states that if the laws are repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow, then citizens will find it very difficult to obey the law.

Madison's argument highlights the importance of having laws that are accessible, coherent, and stable. If laws are constantly being repealed or revised before they are officially promulgated, it becomes challenging for people to keep up with the changes and understand their rights and obligations. This can lead to confusion, uncertainty, and a lack of trust in the government. It can also undermine the rule of law, as people may find it difficult to comply with laws that are constantly changing.

The issue of voluminous and frequently changing laws is not unique to Madison's time. In modern complex societies, the body of laws can be extensive and cover a wide range of subjects. While it is necessary for laws to evolve and adapt to changing social, economic, and technological conditions, frequent or arbitrary changes to the law can create challenges for those governed by them. It is important for lawmakers to carefully consider the potential impact of repealing or revising laws before they are officially promulgated to ensure that the benefits of such changes outweigh the potential disadvantages.

To address the concerns raised by Madison and ensure the laws are accessible, coherent, and stable, several measures can be implemented. These include:

• Ensuring laws are written in clear and concise language that is easy for the average person to understand.
• Providing accessible means for people to stay informed about changes to the law, such as through public education campaigns, easily accessible online resources, or other forms of communication.
• Engaging in comprehensive consultation and consideration before enacting or amending laws to ensure that they are well-drafted, coherent, and necessary.
• Establishing mechanisms for regular review of the law to identify areas where revision or simplification is needed, such as through law reform commissions or similar bodies.
• Promoting government transparency and accountability to ensure that changes to the law are made in the public interest rather than for political gain or to benefit special interests.

Laws undergo incessant changes

James Madison, in The Federalist (1788), warns of the "mischievous effects of a mutable government" that constantly changes the law to suit its own needs or the needs of its supporters. He argues that if the laws are so voluminous that they cannot be read or so incoherent that they cannot be understood, they will be "of little avail to the people." Madison's concerns extend beyond the sheer volume of laws to the implications for liberty and the challenges of governing.

The challenges of governing are heightened when laws are voluminous and subject to constant change. In a dynamic and complex environment, policymakers and citizens alike struggle to keep up with the latest modifications, leading to confusion and uncertainty. The very purpose of laws—to provide a clear framework for behaviour and decision-making—is undermined when they are in a constant state of flux.

Moreover, the ability to govern effectively is hampered when laws are in a state of perpetual revision. Policymakers and administrators are tasked with interpreting and enforcing an ever-shifting legal landscape, leading to inconsistencies and contradictions in implementation. The result is a loss of confidence in the rule of law and a perception of arbitrariness, further eroding social trust and cohesion.

Incessant changes to the law also create challenges for citizens, who may find it difficult to keep abreast of their rights and responsibilities. This is particularly true for those without legal expertise or access to legal resources. The complexity and fluidity of the legal system can lead to a sense of powerlessness and disengagement, as citizens feel they have little control over their legal rights or an understanding of how to exercise them.

Furthermore, a mutable legal system can advantage those with resources and expertise to navigate the changing landscape, while disadvantaging those without such means. This can exacerbate existing inequalities and create barriers to justice and empowerment for marginalised groups.

In conclusion, the incessant changes to laws have far-reaching consequences for governance, social cohesion, and individual empowerment. While some degree of legal evolution is necessary to adapt to changing societal needs, the challenges posed by excessive and rapid modifications cannot be overlooked.

Laws are mutable and constantly changing

Madison argued that it would be of little benefit to the people if the laws were so voluminous that they could not be read or so incoherent that they could not be understood. He warned that if laws were to be repealed or revised before they were even promulgated, or if they underwent such frequent changes that no one could predict what the law would be from one day to the next, then the law itself would "poison the blessings of liberty".

The mutable nature of laws can create challenges for citizens trying to obey them. When laws are constantly changing, it can be difficult for people to stay informed and compliant. This is especially true if the laws are complex and voluminous, or if they are incoherent and difficult to understand.

In addition to the challenges it poses for citizens, mutable laws can also have an impact on legislators themselves. In their haste to pass new laws or make revisions, lawmakers may fail to properly read, debate, or understand the laws they are enacting. This can lead to unintended consequences and further contribute to the complexity and incoherence of the legal system.

The mutable nature of laws is an inherent aspect of a dynamic and responsive government. While it can create challenges, it also allows for necessary changes to be made to address evolving societal needs and values. However, it is important to carefully consider the potential consequences of legal changes and to ensure that laws remain coherent, accessible, and predictable to maintain the trust and confidence of the governed.

Frequently asked questions