The Ever-Changing Abortion Law: A Settled Future?

The question of when abortion law will be settled is a complex and multifaceted one, with no easy answers. In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which granted women the right to a safe and legal abortion. This decision has led to a wave of restrictive law changes and a patchwork of differing state laws, with abortion banned in 14 states and restricted in several others. While some states have chosen to enshrine abortion rights in their constitutions, the future of abortion law remains uncertain. The politicization of the judicial system and the inconsistent application of rules by the two main political parties have contributed to the instability of abortion law, and it is unclear if and when a settlement will be reached.

The conservative movement's strategy to end abortion rights

• Political and Legal Action: The anti-abortion movement has focused on reversing the Roe v. Wade decision, which protected abortion rights at the federal level. They have campaigned for legislative changes and constitutional amendments that restrict or prohibit abortion. The movement scored a major victory in 2022 when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, allowing states to regulate abortion laws.
• Framing the Debate: Anti-abortion advocates frame the issue as a "right-to-life" or "pro-life" matter, emphasizing their belief that abortion is the taking of a human life. They argue that life begins at conception and that the fetus has a right to life. This framing attempts to shift the focus away from women's reproductive rights.
• Utilizing Graphic Imagery: Activists have effectively used graphic images of aborted fetuses to convey their message. This strategy, pioneered by John and Barbara Willke in their "Handbook on Abortion", has been a powerful tool in evoking emotional responses and shaping public opinion.
• Involving Diverse Organizations: The movement includes a variety of organizations, with no centralized decision-making body. This allows for diverse arguments and approaches, such as secular and feminist anti-abortion groups, to reach different audiences.
• Incremental Restrictions: Before the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the movement focused on chipping away at abortion rights through incremental restrictions. They advocated for laws requiring parental consent, informed consent, and waiting periods, making it increasingly difficult to access abortion services.
• State-Level Efforts: With the reversal of Roe v. Wade, the battle for abortion rights has shifted to the state level. Anti-abortion activists have worked to pass restrictive laws and trigger laws in individual states, effectively banning or severely limiting abortion access in many states.
• Focus on Fetal Rights: The movement has worked to elevate the rights of the fetus, even seeking to recognize the fetus as a person with legal rights. This strategy has gained traction, as seen in the Alabama Supreme Court's decision that IVF embryos are legally children.
• Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Anti-abortion groups have established crisis pregnancy centers to persuade pregnant women against abortion. These centers often provide false medical information and do not offer comprehensive medical services.
• Judicial Nominations: The movement has influenced the nomination and confirmation process of conservative justices to the Supreme Court, as seen with the appointments of Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Despite assurances during their confirmation hearings, these justices showed a willingness to overturn Roe v. Wade.
• Abolitionist Push: Some groups within the movement, known as "'abortion abolitionists,' advocate for a complete ban on abortion, including exceptional cases. They compare abortion to slavery and seek to criminalize it, even proposing capital punishment for those involved in abortions.

The politicisation of the Senate's confirmation process

During his confirmation, Brett Kavanaugh assured senators that he viewed Roe v. Wade as "settled law", referring to it as a "precedent on precedent". However, during the recent Supreme Court hearing, Kavanaugh appeared to adopt a different stance, suggesting that the court could overturn Roe v. Wade by upturning past precedents. This disconnect between Kavanaugh's statements during his confirmation and his recent comments has led to concerns about the politicisation of the Senate's confirmation process.

Similarly, Amy Coney Barrett, during her confirmation hearing, emphasised that laws could not be undone based on personal beliefs, stating, "It's not the law of Amy". However, as a conservative Christian, her confirmation was viewed as a step towards the potential unraveling of abortion rights.

The conflicting signals sent by these justices during their confirmation hearings and their subsequent actions on the bench have raised questions about the effectiveness of the Senate's confirmation process. It has also highlighted the challenge of appointing justices who can remain impartial and not be influenced by their personal beliefs or political ideologies.

The confirmation process has become highly polarised, with intense scrutiny and grilling of nominees over their approach to the law. The hearings often extend for days, and in the case of Brett Kavanaugh, his confirmation hearing was explosive, with allegations of sexual assault.

The politicisation of the process is further evident in the focus on abortion debates during confirmation hearings. With the nomination of conservative justices by Republican presidents, the debates over legal precedents set by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey have taken centre stage, as they have direct implications for American women's access to abortion services.

The confirmation process is intended to serve as a check and balance in the constitutional role of the Senate to advise and consent on presidential nominees. However, the deep polarisation and politicisation of the process have led to concerns about its effectiveness in ensuring impartial and independent justices.

As Neil Siegel, a law professor at Duke University, noted, the problem lies in the deep polarisation of American politics, where the nomination and confirmation of federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, is inherently a political process. The challenge for the Senate is to navigate this political landscape while fulfilling its constitutional duty to appoint qualified and impartial justices who will uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of American citizens, including reproductive rights.

The impact of abortion law on public health

Access to Safe Procedures

The legal status of abortion directly impacts the availability and accessibility of safe abortion procedures. When abortion is legal and accessible, women can obtain abortions from qualified healthcare providers using recommended methods, reducing the risk of complications and improving safety. On the other hand, restrictive abortion laws can lead to unsafe abortions performed by untrained individuals using dangerous methods, resulting in higher rates of morbidity and mortality.

Women's Health and Rights

Restricting access to safe and legal abortion services has significant negative health implications for women. According to the World Health Organization, unsafe abortions claim the lives of 23,000 women each year, and many more experience severe health complications. Banning abortion does not reduce the number of abortions but instead drives women to seek unsafe alternatives. Studies suggest that prohibiting abortion in the United States would lead to a substantial increase in pregnancy-related deaths, especially among Black women.

Economic Implications

Abortion laws also carry economic implications for individuals and health systems. Restrictive abortion regulations can impose financial burdens on women, particularly those with limited resources, due to travel costs, loss of income, and other expenses associated with obtaining legal abortion care. Additionally, complications arising from unsafe abortions result in substantial costs for health systems in treating these cases. Providing greater access to modern contraception and quality induced abortion services could lead to substantial monetary savings for households and countries.

A Dynamic Landscape

The legal landscape surrounding abortion is dynamic and subject to change. While some countries, such as Mexico, Argentina, and New Zealand, have liberalized their abortion laws in recent decades, others like El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Poland have tightened restrictions or made abortion entirely illegal. In the United States, the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022 has resulted in a patchwork of state-level abortion laws, with abortion remaining legal in some states and prohibited in others.

In conclusion, abortion law has a profound impact on public health. Restrictive abortion laws compromise women's health and rights, increase financial burdens, and contribute to unsafe procedures with dire health consequences. Conversely, ensuring access to safe and legal abortion services improves women's health outcomes and upholds their fundamental human rights. As the legal landscape surrounding abortion continues to evolve, it remains crucial to consider the far-reaching implications for individuals, communities, and public health at large.

Barriers to accessing abortion

Legal restrictions

Abortion laws vary by region, and in some places, such as the United States, Sierra Leone, Poland, and Morocco, abortion is criminalised or highly restricted. For example, in the US, the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling established a legal right to privacy in abortion decisions, but this has been increasingly undermined by state and federal restrictions on access to abortion services and insurance coverage. These restrictions particularly impact those from marginalised communities, for whom health services are generally less accessible.

Financial barriers

The cost of abortion procedures, as well as associated costs such as travel and accommodation expenses, can pose significant financial barriers, especially for people on low incomes. This is further exacerbated by restrictions on insurance coverage for abortion care, which is often excluded from public and private insurance plans.

Logistical challenges

In some cases, individuals may need to travel long distances or cross state lines to access abortion services, facing logistical challenges such as arranging transportation and accommodation, taking time off work, and finding childcare. These challenges are particularly acute for people living in rural areas or those with limited financial resources.

Social stigma

The stigma associated with abortion can deter people from seeking abortion services or delay their access to care. This stigma may lead to secrecy, marginalisation, and increased morbidity from the procedure. Additionally, "crisis pregnancy centres" that aim to dissuade individuals from seeking abortion care can further isolate and misinform pregnant people.

Limited access to healthcare providers

A lack of healthcare providers offering abortion services, due to institutional policies, religious affiliations, or stigma, can also create barriers to access. This is further compounded by restrictions on the types of medical professionals who are allowed to perform abortions, which limits the availability of qualified providers.

Parental involvement requirements

In many places, parental involvement is required for minors seeking abortions, which can contribute to delays in accessing care. This can be particularly challenging for young people who may not have supportive parents or guardians.

Abortion as a human rights issue

The issue of abortion and its legality has been a contentious topic for decades, with no sign of resolution. In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which removed federal protection of the right to abortion and allowed states to implement their own abortion laws. This has resulted in a patchwork of differing abortion laws across the country, with some states banning abortion entirely while others have placed restrictions on it. The ongoing legal battles and legislative actions mean that abortion laws are constantly changing, making it challenging for individuals to understand their rights and access abortion services.

Abortion is a human rights issue that impacts individuals' autonomy, privacy, liberty, security, equality, and health. According to human rights organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, denying access to safe and legal abortion is a violation of human rights. They argue that abortion restrictions infringe on individuals' right to privacy, autonomy, and bodily integrity. Additionally, criminalizing abortion endangers people's lives by pushing them towards unsafe procedures and introducing the fear of prosecution.

The impact of restricted abortion access disproportionately affects marginalized communities, including people of color, people living in poverty, adolescents, and sexual and gender minorities. These communities often face greater barriers in accessing healthcare and are more likely to resort to unsafe and unregulated abortion methods. The lack of access to safe and legal abortion can also result in forced pregnancy, particularly among girls and marginalized groups, violating their rights to liberty, privacy, and reproductive autonomy.

International human rights law and relevant jurisprudence support the idea that decisions about abortion should belong solely to the pregnant individual without interference or unreasonable restrictions from the state or third parties. United Nations human rights treaty bodies have consistently called for the decriminalization of abortion and the realization of sexual and reproductive rights, including access to safe and legal abortion services.

The ongoing legal and political battles over abortion laws in the United States and other countries highlight the deep polarization and complexity surrounding this issue. While some argue that abortion restrictions are necessary to protect the rights of the unborn, others emphasize the negative consequences for pregnant individuals' human rights and well-being. As the debate continues, it is essential to recognize the human rights implications of abortion laws and to prioritize the protection of individuals' autonomy, health, and safety.

Frequently asked questions