Tort Law: What's The One Exception?

Tort law is a branch of private law that deals with civil suits, with the exception of disputes involving contracts. It focuses on interpersonal wrongdoing primarily between private persons. The concept of tort law is to provide relief to injured parties for harms caused by others, to impose liability on parties responsible for the harm, and to deter others from committing harmful acts. Tort law is considered a form of restorative justice since it seeks to remedy losses or injury by providing monetary compensation.

Tort law can be split into three categories: negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict liability torts. Negligent torts are harms done to people through the failure of another to exercise a certain level of care, usually defined as a reasonable standard of care. Intentional torts are harms that have been caused by the willful misconduct of another. Strict liability torts, unlike negligence and intentional torts, are not concerned with the culpability of the person doing the harm. Instead, such cases focus on the act itself.

Negligence

To establish negligence, the following elements must generally be proven:

• Duty of care: The defendant must owe a duty of care to the plaintiff, which arises from the general expectation that individuals should act reasonably and avoid causing harm to others.
• Breach of duty: The defendant must have breached their duty of care by failing to act reasonably or engaging in conduct that falls below the expected standard of care.
• Causation: The defendant's breach of duty must be the direct or proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries or harm. This requires demonstrating that the harm was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant's actions or omissions.
• Damages: The plaintiff must have suffered actual damages or injuries, which can be physical, emotional, or financial in nature.

Intentional torts

Common examples of intentional torts include:

• Battery: The intentional and offensive touching of another individual without their consent.
• Assault: The immediate intentional creation of apprehension of harm in another individual without their consent.
• False imprisonment: Intentionally confining or bounding someone without their consent and without a means of escape.
• Trespass to land: Entering someone's property without permission.
• Trespass to chattels: Handling items owned by another without permission.
• Conversion: Taking possession of someone else's property with the intention of not returning it.
• Defamation: The intentional communication of false statements about the plaintiff that harm their reputation.
• Intentional infliction of emotional distress: Extreme and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional distress in the plaintiff.

To successfully sue for an intentional tort, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant performed the action leading to the alleged damages and that the defendant acted with purpose or knowledge that their actions would result in a tortious outcome.

Damages for intentional torts tend to be broader and more generous than for negligent torts, as the aim is to deter individuals from intentionally harming each other. For example, punitive damages, which are above and beyond compensatory damages, are easier to obtain in cases of intentional torts. However, intentional torts can be harder to prove, as they often require demonstrating the defendant's mental state and harmful intent, which may not always be expressed explicitly.

Strict liability torts

Abnormally dangerous activities or ultrahazardous activities are those that involve a high degree of risk and cannot be adequately protected against, even with reasonable care. Examples include storing explosives or flammable liquids in a residential area.

In addition, strict liability also applies to products liability, where a defective product causes injury. Plaintiffs in such cases do not need to prove that the manufacturer acted negligently or recklessly but must show that the product was defective, proximately causing their injury, and that the defect made the product unreasonably dangerous.

The concept of strict liability is controversial, as it holds defendants liable regardless of their intentions. However, the associated punishments tend to be more lenient, mitigating potential unfairness.

Tort remedies

Monetary Compensation

The most common remedy in tort law is monetary compensation, also known as damages. Damages are typically awarded to the plaintiff in the form of economic and non-economic compensatory damages to cover their losses. Economic damages include loss of earnings, loss of future earning capacity, and reasonable medical expenses. Non-economic damages include pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of consortium. In certain cases, courts may also award punitive damages to deter future misconduct and punish the defendant.

Injunctions

In some cases, instead of or in addition to monetary compensation, the plaintiff may seek an injunction. An injunction is a court order that requires the defendant to stop engaging in a particular activity or take specific actions to prevent future harm. Injunctions are typically sought when the plaintiff is facing irreparable harm or when monetary compensation alone is insufficient to address the harm caused.

Restitution

Restitution is another remedy available in tort law, although it is less commonly used. Restitution seeks to restore the plaintiff to their original position by requiring the defendant to return any unjust enrichment obtained through their tortious act. This may include disgorgement of profits or the return of property.

Other Remedies

Other forms of relief available in tort cases include nominal damages, which are token amounts awarded when the plaintiff has proven their case but has not suffered significant harm, and specific performance, where the court orders the defendant to take specific actions to fulfil their obligations under a contract.

The specific remedies available to a plaintiff will depend on the facts of the case, the jurisdiction, and the discretion of the court. It is important to note that the boundaries of tort law and the available remedies may vary across different states and jurisdictions.

Tort law vs. contract law

Tort law and contract law are both branches of civil law, but they serve different purposes and apply to different situations.

Tort Law

Tort law deals with the legal theories of negligence and strict product liability. It covers the duty of care that individuals and entities are expected to exercise to avoid causing harm to others. This duty of care is imposed by law and is not dependent on any agreement between parties. In other words, it outlines how people who are not bound by a contract should relate to one another.

Tort law applies when one person breaches their duty of care to another, resulting in personal injury or property damage. The most common type of tort claim is based on negligence, which requires the injured party to prove that the defendant breached their duty of care and caused their injuries or losses.

Other types of torts include intentional torts, such as assault, battery, and trespass, and strict liability torts, where liability is imposed regardless of the defendant's intentions or degree of care.

The main aim of tort law is to provide relief to injured parties, hold responsible parties liable for the harm caused, and deter future harmful acts. Damages in tort law cases are typically monetary and aim to compensate the injured party for their losses, including medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering. Punitive damages may also be awarded in some cases to punish the defendant and deter future misconduct.

Contract Law

On the other hand, contract law deals with the formation and enforcement of contracts, which are agreements between two or more parties. A legally valid and enforceable contract is formed when there is a valid acceptance of an offer and an exchange of consideration (something of value).

Breach of contract occurs when one party fails to perform their obligations as stated in the contract. The non-breaching party can then sue for breach of contract and seek damages. These damages are intended to compensate the non-breaching party for their losses resulting from the breach. Other remedies for breach of contract may include restitution, liquidated damages, nominal damages, and rescission (cancellation) of the contract.

Key Differences

One significant difference between tort law and contract law is the issue of consent and agreement. In contract law, the parties have knowingly entered into a contractual agreement, whereas in tort law, the parties may not know each other and have not agreed on specific terms.

Additionally, the damages in tort law are not fixed or limited and depend on the extent of the harm suffered. In contrast, damages in contract law are typically limited to the economic losses caused by the failure to perform as promised in the contract. Tort law damages are also usually limited to monetary awards, while contract law may allow for specific performance, where the court orders the contract to be performed as agreed.

Frequently asked questions