Louisiana Abortion Law Faces Legal Challenge In Court

Louisiana has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the US. In 2020, Louisiana voters passed a measure to amend the state constitution to omit any language implying that a woman has a right to an abortion. In 2022, Governor John Bel Edwards signed a law criminalizing abortion providers. In 2024, Governor Jeff Landry signed a law that classifies the abortion-inducing drugs mifepristone and misoprostol as controlled substances. Louisiana's abortion laws have been challenged in court several times, most notably in the 2020 Supreme Court case June Medical Services v Russo, which struck down a 2014 Louisiana law that required doctors who provide abortions to have written agreements with local hospitals to transfer patients.

Louisiana's abortion pill law

The law has been criticised by doctors, who argue that it will make it harder for them to prescribe the medications and that it could lead to worse health outcomes for patients, particularly those experiencing pregnancy-related complications or miscarriages. They also argue that the drugs, which are commonly used to induce childbirth, stop uterine haemorrhaging, and treat miscarriages, are being mischaracterised as dangerous drugs of abuse.

Supporters of the law, including Republican Governor Jeff Landry, argue that it will protect expectant mothers from coerced abortions. The law was also motivated by an incident in Texas in which a woman's husband attempted to induce an abortion without her knowledge or consent by giving her misoprostol pills. However, critics of the law note that there have been no similar cases reported in Louisiana.

The law has been characterised as a warning call by reproductive justice advocates, who fear that other states may follow Louisiana's example. They argue that the law is not about patient safety, but about restricting access to abortion and controlling reproductive health issues.

The Supreme Court's stance on abortion

In 1973, the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling established a federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States. This decision decriminalised abortion and protected individuals' right to access abortion services without fear of legal repercussions. The Court reaffirmed this decision in 1992 with its ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which further solidified the constitutional protection of abortion access.

However, in recent years, the Supreme Court has taken a different approach, with a conservative majority now dominating the Court. This shift became evident in 2020, when the Court struck down a restrictive Louisiana abortion law in June Medical Services v. Russo. Chief Justice John Roberts sided with liberal judges, ruling that Louisiana's efforts to restrict abortion access were unconstitutional. This decision was a pivotal test of the Court's new conservative majority, and it upheld a woman's right to obtain an abortion.

Despite this, in 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ending the federal constitutional right to abortion. This decision allowed individual states to make their own legislative decisions regarding abortion, resulting in a wave of abortion bans and restrictions across the country. The Court's conservative majority, including Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, have been instrumental in this shift.

Louisiana's trigger abortion ban

Louisiana has a "trigger" abortion ban that would criminalize abortion if Roe v. Wade were overturned or if a federal constitutional amendment allowed states to determine abortion law and policy. This ban took effect on August 1, 2022, when Roe v. Wade was overturned, and it criminalizes abortion providers. An earlier version of the bill sought to criminalize abortion seekers as well, but this was opposed by both opponents and advocates of abortion rights.

Louisiana's trigger ban was signed into law by then-Governor Kathleen Blanco on June 19, 2006. The law bans most forms of abortion, except when the life or permanent health of the mother is threatened. It allows for the prosecution of any person who performs or aids in performing an abortion, with penalties of up to 10 years' imprisonment and a $100,000 fine.

The Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the trigger ban, and a state court judge temporarily blocked the ban, allowing abortion clinics to resume providing care. The lawsuit argued that the trigger laws were unconstitutionally vague, as it was unclear which of the three trigger bans were in effect and what conduct was prohibited.

Louisiana has a history of restrictive abortion laws, with only three clinics providing abortions as of 2017. The state has imposed various restrictions on abortion providers, such as separate licensing schemes, biased counseling requirements, and mandatory delays, which have led to a decline in the number of abortion clinics.

Louisiana's admitting privileges law

The law was challenged in court by abortion clinics and doctors in the case of June Medical Services, LLC v. Gee, resulting in an injunction ordered by the District Court. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this decision, allowing the law to take effect. The plaintiffs then petitioned the Supreme Court, which granted an emergency stay, pending the outcome of similar litigation in Texas.

The Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt in 2016, declaring the Texas law unconstitutional, set a precedent for the Louisiana case. The District Court found Louisiana's law to be unconstitutional, but the Fifth Circuit reversed this decision, preparing to allow the law to be reintroduced. The plaintiffs again petitioned the Supreme Court, and Justice Samuel Alito granted a temporary stay.

In February 2019, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to reverse the Fifth Circuit's order, preventing the law from taking effect. This ruling reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion access and served as a victory for abortion rights campaigners. The law had the potential to significantly impact abortion access in Louisiana, increasing the average distance women would need to travel for abortion services and disproportionately affecting low-income women and women of color.

Louisiana's abortion restrictions

In 2022, Governor John Bel Edwards signed a law that criminalized abortion providers, and the state constitution was amended to remove any language implying a woman's right to an abortion. This came after a 2019 state law banned abortion after 22 weeks of pregnancy and a separate bill that made abortion illegal in almost all cases. Louisiana was one of several states passing similar laws around this time, including Georgia, Missouri, and Alabama.

The state's abortion restrictions have been challenged in court, most notably in the 2020 Supreme Court case of June Medical Services v. Russo. The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that Louisiana's efforts to restrict access to abortion were unconstitutional, citing a similar Texas law that had been struck down in 2016. This decision affirmed a woman's constitutional right to obtain an abortion, which was first established in the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling.

However, in 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, removing the federal constitutional protection for abortion and allowing states like Louisiana to implement their own restrictions. As a result, abortion became illegal in Louisiana as of August 1, 2022.

In addition to restricting access to abortion procedures, Louisiana has also targeted abortion-related medications. In 2024, the state reclassified mifepristone and misoprostol, commonly known as abortion pills, as "controlled substances." This classification, typically reserved for drugs with a high risk of abuse or dependence, has raised concerns among medical professionals who warn that it will endanger women's lives by restricting access to medications used to treat postpartum hemorrhage and other conditions. The reclassification of these drugs as Schedule IV substances has led to increased security measures and documentation requirements, causing delays in accessing the medications in emergency situations.

The abortion restrictions in Louisiana have had significant impacts on access to reproductive healthcare in the state. As a result of these laws, women in Louisiana have faced increased barriers to obtaining safe and timely abortions, with some being forced to delay routine prenatal care or seek alternative methods such as self-induced abortions.

Frequently asked questions