Abortion Laws: A Sudden And Controversial Change

Abortion laws have been a topic of discussion and debate for decades, with varying legal statuses across the globe. In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade removed nationwide protections for abortion rights, allowing states to implement their own regulations. This shift has resulted in a patchwork of abortion laws across the U.S., with some states criminalizing the procedure while others strengthen protections. The debate surrounding abortion laws extends beyond the U.S., with countries like Mexico and Argentina also undergoing significant changes. While the global trend shows a move towards liberalization of abortion laws, restrictive laws continue to cause harm and violate human rights, leading to efforts by organizations like Amnesty International to defend abortion rights worldwide.

The Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade

The immediate impact of the decision was the rollback of abortion rights in nearly half of the states, and more restrictions were expected to follow. The practical effect was that abortion access was severely limited or unavailable in large parts of the country. The decision also had political repercussions, with the Supreme Court and abortion emerging as key issues in the 2022 midterm elections and beyond.

The ruling was met with strong opposition from reproductive rights advocates, who argued that it represented a significant loss of freedom and autonomy for women and other individuals capable of becoming pregnant. They contended that abortion should be recognized as an affirmative right, guaranteed by the government, rather than being subject to varying state-level restrictions.

The decision also sparked concerns about its potential impact on other areas of law. Justice Clarence Thomas, in his concurring opinion, suggested that the legal rationale for overturning Roe could be applied to overturn other landmark cases, including those that legalized same-sex marriage and protected the rights of married couples to access contraception.

The aftermath of the ruling saw a variety of responses from states. Some states with pre-roe abortion bans on their books, such as Mississippi, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, could revert to a pre-roe environment, with officials seeking to enforce or reinstate those laws. Other states had "trigger bans" in place, designed to take effect immediately upon the overturning of Roe, while some states passed new legislation to restrict or ban abortion.

The ruling also led to legal uncertainty, with courts facing new questions about how to apply the decision to individual state laws. The result was a wave of litigation in federal and state courts, with challenges to various abortion restrictions and attempts to clarify the scope of abortion rights under state constitutions.

The politicisation of abortion

Abortion has become a highly politicised issue, with a long history of legal and social developments. The topic has been a source of contention for decades, with a range of perspectives and beliefs influencing the debate.

In the United States, the issue of abortion gained national attention following the Supreme Court's ruling on Roe v. Wade in 1973, which protected access to abortion. This decision fuelled and unified the anti-abortion movement, transforming it into a nationwide campaign. Prior to this, opposition to abortion was largely a state-level issue and was not as politically charged. The ruling also led to the Republican Party adopting an anti-abortion stance in their platform in 1976, enlisting the support of evangelicals and expanding the movement.

The debate surrounding abortion often centres around the question of bodily autonomy and reproductive rights. Those who support abortion rights argue that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and futures, while opponents of abortion may frame their arguments around the protection of fetal life. The politicisation of the issue has led to a polarisation of these views, with both sides advocating for their respective positions.

The Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn Roe v. Wade has further intensified the politicisation of abortion. This has resulted in a wave of new restrictive laws and an ongoing legal battle over abortion rights. The topic remains highly divisive, with strong opinions on both sides of the debate.

Public opinion on abortion

Overall Views on Abortion

According to a 2024 Pew Research Center survey, 63% of US adults believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 36% say it should be illegal in all or most cases. These numbers have remained relatively stable in recent years, with some fluctuations over the past two decades. A similar Gallup poll from 2024 found that 50% of respondents believe abortion should be legal "only under certain circumstances", while 35% support legality "under any circumstances" and 12% say it should be "illegal in all circumstances".

Views by Demographics

Political affiliation also plays a role, with 57% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents saying abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, compared to 85% of Democrats and Democratic leaners who support legal abortion. Among age groups, younger adults tend to be more supportive of abortion rights, with 76% of those under 30 and 61% of those in their 30s and 40s expressing support for legal abortion.

Views on Specific Circumstances

Additionally, views on the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade provide insight into public opinion. A Gallup poll from 2024 showed that 60% considered overturning Roe v. Wade a "bad thing", while 36% called it a "good thing". This indicates that while Americans may support some restrictions on abortion, a majority disagree with completely overturning the precedent set by Roe v. Wade.

Self-Identification as "Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Life"

The terms "pro-choice" and "pro-life" are often used to describe opposing views on abortion. According to Gallup, a record share of the US electorate identifies as "pro-choice", with 54% choosing this label compared to 41% who identify as "pro-life". This shift began in May 2022 after a leaked draft copy of the Dobbs opinion, indicating a growing trend towards embracing abortion rights.

In conclusion, public opinion on abortion in the US is multifaceted and influenced by a range of factors, including religious and political affiliation, age, and specific circumstances such as the trimester of pregnancy. While a majority of Americans support some form of abortion access, the specifics of these views vary widely, making it a highly nuanced and complex issue.

The impact of abortion laws on physicians

The recent overturning of Roe v. Wade has had a profound impact on physicians, particularly those practising in states with restrictive abortion laws. Doctors have expressed concerns about the legal repercussions of performing abortions, including the potential loss of their medical licenses and incarceration. This has resulted in a "`chilling effect", with many physicians hesitant to provide abortion-related information or referrals to patients, even when their health or life is at risk.

Physicians in states with abortion bans have reported experiencing moral distress and anxiety, feeling conflicted between their ethical obligations to patients and the fear of legal consequences. The uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding abortion laws have made it difficult for doctors to navigate what is permissible, leading to delays in care and adverse outcomes for both patients and providers.

The impact of abortion bans on physicians' mental health has also been significant, with a high prevalence of anxiety and depression reported among doctors practising in these states. The fear of criminal prosecution, loss of income, and incarceration has taken a toll on their well-being.

Furthermore, abortion bans have hindered physicians' ability to deliver comprehensive reproductive healthcare, affecting both patients and providers. Clinicians have struggled to provide care for patients with high-risk pregnancies, including those experiencing miscarriages or fetal anomalies. The restrictions have also disproportionately impacted low-income patients and those with Medicaid insurance, as they often cannot afford to travel out of state for abortions.

The legal climate has created a challenging environment for physicians, who are caught between their ethical duties and the fear of prosecution. This has resulted in delayed or denied care for patients, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of abortion laws on the practice of medicine and patient health.

The history of the anti-abortion movement

The anti-abortion movement in the United States has its roots in the early 19th century, over a century before the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, which protected access to abortion.

Before the mid-1800s, abortion was a widespread and largely stigma-free experience for American women. During this period, the "quickening" doctrine from British common law was used to determine the legality of abortion. Quickening occurred when the pregnant woman could feel the fetus move, usually between the fourth and sixth month of pregnancy. This was the only way to confirm a pregnancy, and so any fetus before this point was considered a potential life. Abortions were often carried out by women themselves, using herbal concoctions, or by healers and physicians.

However, by the mid-19th century, the first right-to-life movement emerged, led by physicians seeking to regulate medicine and establish their authority. They pushed for anti-abortion laws at the state level, arguing that they had superior knowledge about when life began. By 1900, every state had a law forbidding abortion, although there were exceptions if the pregnant person's life was at risk.

In the decades that followed, abortion was mostly illegal, and dangerous, particularly for low-income people and people of colour, especially Black women. In 1930, abortion was listed as the official cause of death for nearly 2,700 women in the US. In the 1940s, the introduction of antibiotics reduced deaths from illegal abortions, but thousands were still admitted to hospital due to medical complications.

In the 1960s, some states, like Colorado, liberalized their abortion laws, and anti-abortion movements began to emerge at the state level. This was fuelled by a larger cultural shift in Americans' ideas about reproduction and abortion, influenced by tragedies such as the Thalidomide scandal and an outbreak of German measles, which caused thousands of stillbirths and severe abnormalities. A nascent feminist movement also began to argue that women could not be full citizens without control over reproduction.

The modern anti-abortion political movement was born in response to these changes, with Catholic doctors, nurses, lawyers, and housewives joining together to oppose liberalization. The National Right to Life Committee, formed in 1967, was the first major anti-abortion organization in the US.

The 1973 Roe v. Wade decision changed everything, galvanizing the anti-abortion movement and transforming it into a national campaign. The movement remained heavily Catholic and framed abortion as a rights issue, not a religious one. They promoted the Hyde Amendment, which prohibited federal funding of abortions through Medicaid, and pushed for a constitutional amendment banning abortion.

In the following decades, the anti-abortion movement developed new ways to convey its message, focusing on the fetus and excusing the pregnant woman from the narrative. They used graphic images of aborted fetuses, models, and jewellery, and made comparisons between abortion and the Holocaust and the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision, which ruled that Black people were not US citizens.

The movement also gained support from evangelical Christians, who joined in large numbers in the late 1970s and early 1980s. This rejuvenated and radicalized the movement, leading to the formation of more extreme groups like Operation Rescue, which sought to end abortion "by any means necessary".

Through the 1980s and 1990s, anti-abortion activists worked to make access to abortion more difficult at the state level, with laws requiring parental notification and informed consent, and imposing waiting periods. They also reinterpreted women's relationship with abortion, arguing that feminists had persuaded women to deny the "truth" about fetal life, and that abortion damaged women's bodies and psyches.

In recent years, the anti-abortion movement has been successful in promoting new laws restricting abortion, with the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, ending federal abortion rights and allowing states to regulate their own abortion laws.

Frequently asked questions