Supreme Court's Decision On Georgia's Abortion Law

On September 30, 2024, a Georgia judge struck down the state's abortion ban, allowing abortions to resume up to 22 weeks of pregnancy. However, on October 7, 2024, the Georgia Supreme Court reinstated the six-week abortion ban, ruling that the ban will remain in effect while litigation over it continues. This decision sparked protests from abortion rights supporters, especially in light of recent reports that two women in Georgia died due to a lack of access to legal abortions. The back-and-forth between the Georgia courts highlights the ongoing debate and legal battles surrounding abortion rights in the state and across the United States.

The Life Act

In September 2024, a Georgia judge, Robert McBurney, struck down the law, ruling that abortions must be regulated as they were before the Act took effect. McBurney's ruling allowed abortions in Georgia up to 22 weeks of pregnancy, which was the previous limit in the state.

However, this ruling was short-lived. In October 2024, the Georgia Supreme Court reinstated the six-week abortion ban while considering an appeal to the lower court's decision. The ban will remain in effect while the litigation plays out.

The debate around the Life Act and abortion laws in Georgia continues to be a contentious issue, with abortion rights supporters protesting the restrictions and highlighting the devastating consequences of the ban, including the deaths of two women who were unable to access legal abortions.

Judge Robert McBurney's ruling

On September 30, 2024, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney blocked Georgia's abortion law, which banned abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy. In his 26-page opinion, Judge McBurney ruled that the law, known as the Life Act, violated the rights to privacy and liberty guaranteed by the state constitution. He wrote that "liberty in Georgia includes in its meaning, in its protections, and in its bundle of rights the power of a woman to control her own body, to decide what happens to it and in it, and to reject state interference with her healthcare choices."

Judge McBurney's ruling stated that abortions in Georgia could resume, allowing them through at least 20 weeks of pregnancy. This decision was based on the idea that the state could only ban abortion after fetal viability, which tends to occur closer to 24 weeks. The judge highlighted that many women do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks, and an arbitrary six-week ban infringes on their rights to privacy and liberty.

In his opinion, Judge McBurney emphasised the impact of the abortion ban on women's lives, particularly those from marginalised communities. He wrote, "For these women, the liberty of privacy means that they alone should choose whether they serve as human incubators for the five months leading up to viability... It is not for a legislator, a judge, or a commander from The Handmaid's Tale to tell these women what to do with their bodies." He also acknowledged the "uncomfortable and usually unspoken subtext of involuntary servitude" in the debate, noting that the laws disproportionately affect poor women and women of colour.

Judge McBurney's ruling was met with mixed reactions. Abortion rights supporters, including Monica Simpson, executive director of SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective (a plaintiff in the case), celebrated the decision. However, Georgia's Attorney General, Republican Chris Carr, expressed disagreement and indicated that the state would appeal the ruling to the state supreme court, seeking to reinstate the six-week ban.

The role of the Georgia Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of Georgia is the highest judicial authority in the state of Georgia. It was established in 1845 as a three-member panel, but the number of justices has since expanded to nine. The justices are elected by the people of the state in non-partisan elections for six-year terms, and any vacancies are filled through appointments by the Governor.

The Supreme Court of Georgia has the authority to review decisions made by the state's lower trial courts in civil and criminal cases. It is the only court in Georgia with the power to rule on questions involving the constitutionality of state statutes, criminal cases involving the death penalty, election contests, and petitions from decisions of the Court of Appeals.

In the context of the abortion law debate in Georgia, the Supreme Court of Georgia has played a significant role. After a lower court judge, Fulton County Superior Judge Robert McBurney, overturned the state's six-week abortion ban, known as the Life Act or the Living Infants Fairness and Equality Act, the Georgia Supreme Court reinstated the ban while considering an appeal to the lower court's decision. The Supreme Court's ruling allowed the state to enforce the six-week abortion ban while litigation over the law continued.

The impact on abortion access in the US South

On 30 September 2024, a Georgia judge struck down the state's abortion ban, allowing abortion care to resume. The ruling, made by Fulton County Superior Judge Robert McBurney, deemed that abortions must be regulated as they were before the law took effect in 2022.

The six-week abortion ban, known as the Life Act, was passed in 2019 but was blocked as long as Roe v Wade was the law of the land. In his 26-page opinion, Judge McBurney wrote that abortions are now legal in Georgia up until about 22 weeks of pregnancy, which was the limit before the Life Act.

This ruling has significant implications for abortion access in the US South, a region where several Republican-controlled state legislatures have passed restrictive abortion laws. Prior to Judge McBurney's ruling, people in the region sometimes had to travel hundreds of miles to states like North Carolina, Kansas, and Illinois for legal abortions.

The decision to strike down Georgia's abortion ban provides a legal precedent that could influence other states in the South. It sends a strong message about the importance of bodily autonomy and a woman's right to choose. However, it is important to note that the battle for abortion rights in Georgia is not over. The state's Republican Attorney General, Chris Carr, could appeal the case to the state supreme court and ask for the six-week ban to be reinstated, as they have done so in the past.

The impact of Judge McBurney's ruling is already being felt on the ground. Abortion providers in Georgia have reported an increased interest in abortion appointments since the ban was lifted. This demonstrates the urgent need for access to safe and legal abortion care in the state and the potential impact of similar rulings across the US South.

While the future of abortion rights in Georgia and the US South remains uncertain, Judge McBurney's ruling offers a glimmer of hope for those fighting for reproductive justice. It serves as a reminder that the courts have the power to protect the rights of individuals, even in the face of restrictive legislation.

The political implications

The Georgia abortion law has also drawn attention to the role of the courts in shaping abortion policy. The law was initially struck down by Judge McBurney in 2022 but was later reinstated by the Georgia Supreme Court. This back-and-forth highlights the importance of judicial appointments and the potential for courts to shape policy, particularly on divisive issues like abortion.

The Georgia abortion law and the subsequent court rulings have also brought attention to the human cost of abortion bans. Two women in Georgia, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, died after being unable to access legal abortions, and their deaths have been highlighted by abortion rights supporters and Vice President Kamala Harris. The human toll of abortion bans is likely to be a continuing theme in the political debate surrounding abortion, with abortion rights supporters arguing that these laws endanger women's lives.

Overall, the political implications of the Georgia abortion law are significant and far-reaching. The law has become a focal point in the presidential election, highlighting divisions between states and the role of the courts in shaping policy. The law has also drawn attention to the human cost of abortion bans and the potential for courts to protect abortion access, particularly in the US South. The debate surrounding the Georgia abortion law is likely to continue to shape the political landscape in the lead-up to the 2024 election and beyond.

Frequently asked questions