El Salvador's Abortion Laws: Strict And Controversial

El Salvador has one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the world. Abortion is illegal in all circumstances and can result in harsh prison sentences for those accused of terminating a pregnancy. The country's abortion laws have been criticised by human rights organisations, who argue that they violate several treaties that El Salvador has ratified, including the right to life, liberty, security of person, and social justice. The laws have been linked to unsafe abortions, high mortality and morbidity rates, and a lack of reliable studies to help health services provide better care.

The impact on women's rights

El Salvador's abortion laws have a profound impact on women's rights. The country's total ban on abortion in all circumstances, coupled with harsh prison sentences for those accused of terminating a pregnancy, has severe consequences for women and girls. The laws restrict women's access to safe and legal abortions, even in cases where their lives are at risk, posing a significant threat to their health, liberty, security, and social justice.

The criminalization of abortion in El Salvador denies women their reproductive rights and the ability to make decisions about their own bodies. It forces them to resort to unsafe and clandestine abortion methods, putting their lives and health at risk. The fear of prosecution further discourages women from seeking post-abortion medical care, increasing their chances of morbidity and mortality. The laws also fail to account for cases of rape, incest, or fetal abnormalities, further endangering the lives and well-being of pregnant women and girls.

The impact of these strict abortion laws falls disproportionately on marginalized and vulnerable groups, particularly young, unmarried, and low-income women. The lack of access to safe abortion services and the high cost of contraception contribute to unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortions, resulting in preventable physical and mental health issues. The laws also fail to address the high rate of teenage pregnancy in El Salvador, which is the highest in Latin America.

The abortion ban in El Salvador is a blatant violation of internationally recognized human rights, as outlined in various treaties and conventions, including the right to health, life, liberty, physical integrity, and non-discrimination. By ratifying these treaties, El Salvador has legally obligated itself to protect and guarantee these rights for all its citizens, yet its abortion laws directly contradict these commitments.

The strict abortion laws in El Salvador have led to the persecution and incarceration of women who suffer miscarriages or obstetric emergencies, with some serving decades-long prison sentences. This has created a culture of fear and injustice, where women are denied their freedom and subjected to inhumane treatment. The laws also enable state interference in women's private and personal decisions, further eroding their autonomy and agency.

Overall, the impact of El Salvador's strict abortion laws on women's rights is profound and far-reaching. The laws restrict women's access to essential reproductive health services, endanger their lives and well-being, and perpetuate a culture of inequality and injustice. The violation of internationally recognized human rights underscores the urgent need for legislative reform to protect and promote women's rights in El Salvador.

The influence of Catholicism

Catholicism has had a significant influence on El Salvador's strict abortion laws. The country's official religion was imposed on its Indigenous people during colonial rule, and it continues to exert a strong influence on the government. While other Catholic-majority Latin American nations have relaxed their abortion laws as they have become more secular, El Salvador has maintained a firm stance against abortion, largely due to the Catholic Church's lobbying efforts.

The Catholic Church began organizing against abortion decriminalization when feminist movements emerged to claim the autonomy of people's bodies. The Church's moral opposition to abortion has been a driving force behind the country's strict abortion laws. In 1998, the Penal Code of El Salvador was amended to remove all exceptions to the prohibition of abortion, and this change was supported by the country's archbishop. The following year, the Salvadoran Constitution was amended to state that life begins at conception, further securing the legal standing of the abortion ban.

The Catholic Church's influence on El Salvador's abortion laws is also evident in the country's political system. The leading political parties, such as the Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA), have supported and voted for the strict abortion laws. The influence of the Church is so strong that even the leftist rebel movement, Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN), which initially opposed the abortion ban, eventually moved away from its leftist roots and failed to outweigh the Church's influence.

The Catholic Church's stance on abortion has had a significant impact on public opinion in El Salvador. Most Salvadorans do not support abortion access, and politicians are afraid of losing votes if they advocate for abortion rights. This dynamic further reinforces the country's strict abortion laws and makes it challenging for activists and politicians to push for change.

In addition to the direct influence of the Catholic Church, the growth of evangelical Christianity in El Salvador has also contributed to the country's strict abortion laws. With an estimated 40% of Salvadorans identifying as evangelicals, this religious group has increasing political clout, and their values and views are increasingly reflected in parliament.

Overall, the influence of Catholicism, both directly through the Catholic Church and indirectly through the spread of evangelical Christianity, has played a crucial role in shaping El Salvador's strict abortion laws. The moral and political power of these religious groups has made it challenging for activists and politicians to advocate for reproductive rights and has resulted in one of the world's most restrictive abortion laws.

The role of politics

El Salvador's strict abortion laws are the result of a complex interplay of political, religious, and cultural factors. Here is an analysis of the role of politics in shaping the country's abortion legislation:

In the early 1990s, El Salvador was in a period of political transition following a devastating civil war that ended in 1992. This created an opportunity for various interest groups to influence policy-making, including conservative and religious organizations. The Catholic Church, which holds significant influence in the country, launched a successful campaign for restrictive abortion laws, arguing that abortion was an "unjust termination of life" that defied religious values. The Church's efforts were bolstered by conservative political parties and anti-abortion groups, such as the "Say Yes to Life Foundation."

In 1997, the Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA), a conservative political party, proposed a draft bill to amend the Penal Code and remove all grounds under which abortion was permitted. This proposal gained traction, and in 1998, a new Penal Code was enacted, making abortion illegal in all circumstances. This marked a significant shift from the previous law, which allowed abortion under certain conditions, such as when the pregnant woman's life was in danger or in cases of rape or serious fetal congenital disorders.

The political push for stricter abortion laws was not without opposition. Human rights organizations, such as IPAS, MADRE, and Women's Link Worldwide, argued that the ban violated several international treaties that El Salvador had ratified, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). They contended that the criminalization of abortion infringed upon women's constitutional and human rights, including the right to life, liberty, security, and equality before the law.

Despite these objections, the abortion ban remained in place due to the strong influence of conservative and religious groups in El Salvador's political landscape. The country's political leadership, including President Nayib Bukele, has maintained a hardline stance against abortion, even in cases of incest or rape. This stance has been reinforced by the recent ruling of the US Supreme Court on Roe v. Wade, which has emboldened conservatives in Central America.

The political battle over abortion rights in El Salvador continues to be fiercely contested. Women's rights activists, as part of the "green wave" movement in Latin America, are working to shift societal attitudes and challenge the legal restrictions on abortion. They argue that the ban denies women their freedom and puts their lives and health at risk. However, changing attitudes in a traditionally Catholic and increasingly evangelical Christian country remains a significant challenge.

The consequences for maternal mortality

El Salvador has one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the world. Abortion is illegal in all circumstances and is punishable by harsh prison sentences. The consequences of these laws on maternal mortality are severe.

Unsafe abortions are a serious public health problem in El Salvador and the second direct cause of maternal mortality. The criminalisation of abortion means that women resort to dangerous methods to terminate pregnancies. Doctors in El Salvador report that women seeking abortions use methods such as clothes hangers, metal rods, high doses of contraceptives, and caustic fluids. These methods can kill or permanently injure women. In addition, women are forced to self-induce abortions in unsanitary conditions or in clandestine clinics, which further increases the risk of complications. If complications arise, women are often reported to the authorities by hospital staff, leading to arrest and prosecution.

The lack of access to safe and legal abortion puts women's lives and health at risk. According to the World Health Organisation, 11% of women and girls who undergo clandestine abortions in El Salvador die as a result. The true figure is likely to be much higher due to the secrecy surrounding the practice. The ban on abortion also leads to a lack of reliable studies that could help health services provide better care to women who have had abortions in unsafe conditions.

The consequences of El Salvador's strict abortion laws extend beyond physical health. Women who have miscarriages or stillbirths are often wrongly accused of abortion or homicide and face lengthy prison sentences. The threat of prosecution creates a climate of fear and discourages women from seeking medical attention when they need it. This further exacerbates the risk to women's lives and health.

The criminalisation of abortion in El Salvador has resulted in high rates of maternal mortality and morbidity. It has also led to the persecution and incarceration of women who have suffered miscarriages or pregnancy complications. The consequences of these strict abortion laws highlight the urgent need for legal and cultural changes to protect women's lives and reproductive rights.

International condemnation

El Salvador's abortion laws have been criticised by human rights groups, women's rights campaigners, and international organisations such as the United Nations and Amnesty International.

In 2001, several human rights organisations, including IPAS, MADRE, and Women's Link Worldwide, submitted a report to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, arguing that El Salvador's abortion laws violate several treaties that the country has ratified. These include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). The report contends that El Salvador's criminal anti-abortion legislation violates the constitutional and human rights outlined in these international conventions, such as the right to life, liberty, security, and social justice.

In 2013, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights heard the case of "Beatriz", a pregnant woman who was denied an abortion despite her high-risk pregnancy. Beatriz had lupus and was carrying a fetus with a fatal brain defect. The Medical Committee of El Salvador's national maternity hospital recommended terminating the pregnancy, but the Supreme Court ruled against it. The Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR) called on El Salvador to carry out the recommended treatment, but the country failed to comply. This case sparked international condemnation and highlighted the dire consequences of El Salvador's total abortion ban.

Amnesty International has also been vocal in its criticism of El Salvador's abortion laws. They have documented cases of women being sentenced to decades in prison after having a miscarriage or stillbirth. In some instances, women have been reported to the police by medical personnel and subsequently arrested and charged with abortion or homicide. Amnesty International's report, "On the Brink of Death: Violence Against Women and the Abortion Ban in El Salvador," details how the restrictive laws are destroying the lives of women and girls, leading to unsafe abortions, high mortality rates, and a lack of access to reproductive healthcare.

The impact of El Salvador's abortion ban has also been felt beyond its borders. In 2017, it was revealed that a US-based anti-abortion group, Human Life International, had been quietly funneling funds to El Salvador's main advocates for the ban, Sí a la Vida. This group was responsible for the country's abortion ban and has continued to support it publicly. The funding from Human Life International has been criticised by groups opposing the abortion ban as promoting inequality, imprisonment, and hate towards women.

The international community, including human rights organisations and women's rights campaigners, has largely condemned El Salvador's strict abortion laws as a violation of human rights and a threat to the lives and health of women and girls. The United Nations and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have both emphasised the need for access to safe and legal abortion to protect autonomy and reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.

Frequently asked questions