Evolution Of Law: Dynamic And Ever-Changing

It is a common perception that the law is a fixed, unchanging entity, but this is not the case. Law is a dynamic entity that evolves with time. Lawmakers create, modify and delete laws to reflect the changing needs of society and to uphold the values and beliefs of the people. The interplay between law and society is a complex one, and the co-evolution of both these entities is influenced by several factors.

Changing community values

Laws are designed to ensure social cohesion and peace within a community. As societal values evolve, so must the law to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in governing a society. This evolution of societal values and the need for laws to reflect them is known as changing community values.

The legal system's role has also evolved from solely regulating behaviour to upholding individual rights and protecting people from harm. For example, Brodie's Law, introduced in 2011, criminalized bullying in the workplace, demonstrating the legal system's expanded role in protecting individuals from harm.

Community awareness and expectations of the legal system have also increased due to improved communication and information access. This has led to citizens pressuring lawmakers to amend or introduce legislation that addresses their concerns. For instance, laws have been amended or enacted to address issues such as abortion, smoking in public places, and the detrimental health impacts of passive smoking.

In conclusion, changing community values are a critical factor in the evolution of laws over time. The law must adapt to reflect shifting societal values, address new community concerns, and uphold individual rights and protection. By doing so, the law maintains its relevance and ensures social cohesion and peace within a community.

Technological advancements

Laws are meant to ensure social cohesion and allow individuals to live together in peace. As society changes, so too must the law to maintain this cohesion. Technological advancements are one of the reasons why laws need to change over time.

Technological change affects the law in several ways. Firstly, it can alter the cost of violating and enforcing existing legal rules. For instance, the development of digital cameras led to the "Upskirting Amendment Act (2007)". Secondly, technological advancements can change the underlying facts that justify legal rules. For example, the emergence of social media and electronic cigarettes has made it difficult for regulators to keep up as these are fast-changing environments. By the time a regulation is approved, the product or service has often already changed. Finally, new technologies can render existing legal concepts and categories obsolete or meaningless by changing the underlying facts implicitly assumed by the law.

The law must also adapt to the market, especially in areas such as data privacy and cybersecurity, which are of increasing importance to senior executives. As media companies become more sophisticated with data analytics, they should be able to provide better services to their customers. However, this also raises concerns about data privacy and the acceptable use of collated data. With the public becoming increasingly aware of the value and dangers of sharing data, companies will need to guarantee data privacy and ensure the acceptable use of the data they collect.

Furthermore, technological advancements can lead to changes in community values and awareness. As society becomes more informed and aware of relevant issues due to the speed and efficiency of communication, the law must uphold and reflect these changing values and beliefs. For example, people's perspectives on issues such as abortion and the detrimental health impacts of smoking and passive smoking have changed over time, leading to amendments or new laws being introduced to reflect these shifts in community values.

New international agreements

International agreements are written agreements between sovereign states or between states and international organisations, governed by international law. They are a significant reason for the evolution of laws over time.

One of the impacts of globalisation, particularly post-WWII, is that nation-states have entered into significantly more international agreements (treaties). Treaties can cover a wide range of topics, including peace, trade, defence, territorial boundaries, human rights, and law. When a country enters into a new treaty, legislation must be passed to fulfil the treaty terms. For example, the United States enters into more than 200 treaties and other international agreements each year.

International climate change law is a notable area where new international agreements have led to changes in the law. The Paris Agreement, the Kyoto Protocol, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and the decisions made by the UNFCCC in implementing these treaties are major sources of international climate change law. The UNFCCC, for instance, consists of multiple bodies tasked with implementing the Convention, the Kyoto Protocol, and the Paris Agreement. The decisions made by these bodies provide an additional source of international law that builds upon the original treaties.

Another example of a new international agreement is the Global Plastics Treaty. On March 2, 2022, the United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme adopted a resolution to negotiate an international legally binding agreement by 2024 to address plastic pollution.

Thus, new international agreements are a significant factor in the evolution of laws over time, as countries work together to address global issues and implement treaty terms through domestic legislation.

Pressure from citizens

Laws are meant to ensure social cohesion and allow individuals to live together peacefully. As society changes, so do its laws, in order to maintain this cohesion. Changes in societal values, expectations, and awareness, as well as the emergence of new technologies, are some of the reasons why laws need to be amended or introduced.

Insider groups have private contacts within the government and are regularly consulted over planned legislation and policies, giving them significant influence over the law-making process. They may offer their views on draft legislation and provide specialised knowledge in exchange for policy influence. Insider groups can lobby Members of Parliament (MPs) directly and may even pursue legal action through the courts if they believe the government has acted contrary to the rule of law or discriminated against a particular group.

Outsider groups, on the other hand, rarely have direct access to lawmakers and instead rely on less discreet methods to exert pressure. They may resort to email campaigns, petitions, demonstrations, and publicity stunts to draw attention to their concerns. Outsider groups can also lobby MPs and petition to raise awareness and demonstrate public support for their cause. While outsider groups may have less direct influence than insider groups, they can still play a significant role in shaping public opinion and pressuring lawmakers to act.

Both insider and outsider pressure groups can influence legal change by responding to the changing needs and values of society. For example, the "Family Law Act 1975" in Australia was introduced in response to shifting community values towards divorce, repealing the "Matrimonial Causes Act 1959", which required fault to be proven for a divorce to be granted. Similarly, laws addressing issues such as abortion, smoking in public places, and online defamation have been amended or introduced to reflect evolving societal values and expectations of the legal system.

Changing expectations of the legal system

Laws are dynamic and ever-changing, adapting to the evolving needs of society. Changing expectations of the legal system are a key driver of these shifts in legislation.

Historically, the primary role of the law was to regulate behaviour and maintain social cohesion. However, in today's world, the expectations of the legal system have expanded significantly. People now look to the law not only for behaviour regulation but also for the protection of individual rights and the prevention of harm. This shift has prompted the law to take on a more active role, addressing contemporary issues such as online defamation, duty of care, and negligence.

The evolution of community values is a pivotal factor in the changing expectations of the legal system. As societal values evolve over time, the law must adapt to remain relevant and reflective of these values. For instance, changing perspectives on issues such as abortion and the health impacts of smoking have led to amendments or the introduction of new laws. Similarly, shifting community values towards divorce prompted the enactment of the "Family Law Act 1975", which made divorce more accessible to married couples by repealing the requirement of fault assigned to one or both parties.

Technological advancements also play a crucial role in shaping the expectations of the legal system. The rapid pace of technological development often introduces new features that can be misused or have harmful implications. Consequently, the law must adapt to regulate the use of these technologies and protect the rights of individuals. For example, the emergence of digital cameras led to the "Upskirting Amendment Act (2007)" to address the misuse of this technology.

Moreover, increased community awareness and access to information have empowered citizens to demand changes in legislation. Informed citizens are more likely to pressure lawmakers to amend or introduce laws that align with their beliefs and values. This proactive engagement with the legal system reflects a shift in expectations, where citizens expect the law to be responsive to their concerns and adaptable to societal changes.

Lastly, changing expectations of the legal system also extend to the realm of legal services and client relationships. Legal clients increasingly expect higher levels of service and faster resolutions to their legal matters. This shift has prompted lawyers to be more proactive in managing client expectations, providing transparent communication and offering realistic assessments of their clients' legal situations.

Frequently asked questions