Governing Law: Multiple States, One Agreement?

When it comes to agreements and contracts, a choice of law or governing law provision is crucial. This clause allows the involved parties to agree on which state's laws will be applied if there is a dispute, even if they reside in or sign the contract in a different state. This choice of law can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, with certain legal cultures, like English common law or Napoleonic civil law, influencing multiple jurisdictions. In the United States, contracts are typically governed by state law, and the choice of law provision ensures that the appropriate state laws are applied. However, in some cases, the litigants may agree that the choice of law doesn't matter as the governing principles are similar across different options. While the choice of governing law is essential, the selection of jurisdiction, or the location where disputes will be resolved, can be even more critical, as it determines where the parties will have to go to resolve any issues.

Choice of law provisions

A "choice of law" or "governing law" provision in a contract allows the parties to agree that a particular state's laws will be used to interpret the agreement, even if they live in or the agreement is signed in a different state. This is one of the most important clauses in any contract as it determines the Governing Law of the relationship detailed in the contract. It is also important to note that the choice of law provision can be problematic if it appears in an insurance contract because some states want to ensure their consumer protection laws relating to insurance apply to those within their borders.

The choice of law provision can be as short as one or two sentences. For example, "Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts." The choice of law provision might also run into problems if it appears in an insurance contract because some states will want to ensure their consumer protection laws with regard to insurance will apply within their borders.

When drafting a contract, it is very common for the parties to include a choice of law provision. These provisions typically provide that a particular state's law will apply regardless of conflict of laws principles. Questions arise as to which law to apply when a dispute takes place in a state that is different from the one in the contract. Generally, courts will enforce a choice-of-law provision so long as the chosen law bears a reasonable relationship to the parties or the transaction. Including such a provision demonstrates the parties' intent that courts not conduct a conflict-of-laws analysis.

Courts should always apply the law of the jurisdiction selected in the choice-of-law clause to interpret the language in the clause. This conclusion follows logically from the fact that the parties to the agreement could have rewritten their choice-of-law clause to state their intentions more clearly. If the parties may obtain a particular result by redrafting their agreement, there is no reason why they should not be able to obtain this same result by selecting the interpretive rules of the chosen jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction

The jurisdiction clause in a contract specifies the court or legal system that will preside over any disputes. For instance, the "state courts of New York" signifies the jurisdiction, while the "state laws of New York" refer to the governing law. It is important to note that the governing law clause and jurisdiction clause are distinct, and they do not need to match. Businesses often include jurisdiction information within their governing law clause for convenience.

The choice of jurisdiction can have significant implications for resolving disputes. If a dispute arises, the parties involved will need to go to the chosen jurisdiction to resolve it, which can be costly if the jurisdiction is far from where they live and work. Therefore, it is essential to carefully consider the jurisdiction when drafting a contract.

In the context of governing law, jurisdiction refers to a larger area with its own specific local laws. There are 51 jurisdictions within the United States, each with its own unique legal culture. These jurisdictions are often grouped based on a shared legal culture, such as the English common law culture or the Napoleonic civil law culture. The choice of jurisdiction can impact the interpretation and enforcement of contract terms, as courts within that jurisdiction will be more experienced in applying the chosen law.

International cross-border disputes

The choice of law provision in a contract determines which state's or country's laws will govern any disputes. This is important because it provides clarity and peace of mind, as knowing the laws of the state where the case will be settled can give assurance about the outcome. Additionally, it can save time and money by speeding up the dispute resolution process. When drafting a contract, it is essential to carefully select the governing state and use extensive and detailed language in the choice of law clause to avoid any ambiguity.

In the context of international cross-border disputes, the legal system that governs the behaviour of states and individuals under their jurisdiction comes into play. This includes treaties that bind all parties, custom-based state practices, and rules known as ius cogens, which are considered fundamental in international law. The impact of cross-border conflicts raises questions about the essence of modern international law, especially in the context of international armed conflicts (ILAC) and international human rights law (IHRL).

When choosing a governing law for international cross-border disputes, it is essential to consider the nature of the relationship between the parties and the subject matter of the contract. For instance, if products are involved, strong non-compete laws in a specific state may be beneficial. Alternatively, if the work is primarily online, stronger data privacy laws in another state may take precedence. It is recommended to consult with lawyers licensed and versed in the relevant laws of the chosen jurisdiction to navigate these complex decisions effectively.

In summary, international cross-border disputes require careful consideration of the governing law and jurisdiction. The choice of law provision plays a crucial role in determining which state's or country's laws will govern the dispute, providing clarity and peace of mind for the parties involved. Seeking legal counsel and drafting contracts with precise language are essential steps to ensure a mutually agreed-upon governing law and a successful resolution.

Contractual obligations

The choice of governing law is crucial in cross-border contracts, where the transaction involves parties from different states or countries. In such cases, nominating a governing law is essential to avoid costly legal battles. The chosen governing law should facilitate the performance of the contract rather than impede it. Parties may consider the nature of their relationship, the subject matter of the contract, and their familiarity with the governing law when making a selection. For example, if products are involved, New York's strong non-compete laws may be beneficial, while for online work, France's stronger data privacy laws may be more important.

While the choice of governing law is important, it is not usually a major negotiating issue, as most locations follow the same basic legal principles. However, the selection of jurisdiction can be more crucial, as any disputes will have to be resolved in the chosen location, which can be costly if it is far from where the parties reside or do business. In some cases, the choice of law and jurisdiction provisions may be grouped into one paragraph, while in others, they may be kept separate. It is also worth noting that certain types of contracts, such as insurance contracts or those involving secured transactions, may have specific requirements or restrictions regarding the choice of law provision.

Ultimately, the parties should choose a governing law from the same state where claims under the contract will be brought, ensuring that the courts interpreting and enforcing the contract are experienced in applying the chosen law. Consulting an experienced attorney is essential to ensure the best governing law is selected for the specific circumstances of the contract.

Governing law and jurisdiction

A "Governing Law" clause is a clause used in legal agreements to declare which rules and laws will govern the agreement if legal issues arise. It is one of the most important clauses in any contract. The choice of law provision determines the governing law of the relationship detailed in the contract, which is to say, what location's law will govern any dispute between the parties if the contract is broken. For example, if a contract is broken between two American companies located in California and Texas, respectively, the Governing Law would determine which of those two states' local laws would be applied while a resolution is sought out.

The choice of law provision could also be problematic if it appears in an insurance contract because some states will want to ensure their consumer protection laws with regard to insurance will apply within their borders. For instance, Massachusetts prohibits choice-of-law provisions in insurance contracts. Some contracts involving secured transactions and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) could also conflict with choice-of-law rules. Additionally, contracts governing corporate behaviour usually must be decided by the law of the state of incorporation.

The selection of which state is used for governing law is usually not a crucial negotiating issue. However, the selection of the state for jurisdiction can be more important. If there is a dispute, that is where everyone will have to go to resolve it. Within the body of a contract, the choice of law provision is quite short, mostly summed up in one or two sentences. Jurisdiction refers to the location in which the dispute will be heard and resolved, while governing law indicates which state's law will be used to decide the dispute. It is possible, for example, for a contract to require lawsuits to be filed in California but decided under New York law.

In the United States, contracts are governed by state law. When choosing a governing law, consider the type of transaction involved. For example, in employment contracts, employers are generally concerned about enforcing restrictive agreements like non-compete and non-solicitation. US state laws vary on how easily employers can enforce these restrictions. Similarly, some state laws have technicalities that complicate commercial transactions. The chosen governing law should facilitate performing the contract rather than impede it. Parties' familiarity with governing law is also important. This is influenced by the location of each party and the place where the contract will be performed.

Frequently asked questions