Executive Orders: Overriding Laws Or Subordinate To Them?

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage the operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively and published in the Federal Register, the official journal of the federal government. While they are not laws per se, they carry the force of law within the executive branch's authority and are subject to judicial review. Executive orders can be challenged in court and overturned by Congress if they are deemed unconstitutional or lacking support by statute or the Constitution. However, they can be implemented right away by the responsible agency, and until they are overturned or ruled unconstitutional, they hold the power of law. This raises the question: can an executive order supersede a law?

Executive orders are directives from the President to manage operations of the federal government

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage the operations of the federal government. They are numbered consecutively and are signed, written, and published documents. The White House issues the order first, after which it is published in the Federal Register, the official daily journal of the federal government. Executive orders are also recorded under Title 3 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, which is a codification of the permanent rules issued by the executive branch.

The legal basis for executive orders comes from Article Two of the United States Constitution, which grants the President broad executive and enforcement authority. This includes the power to determine how to enforce the law and manage the resources and staff of the federal government's executive branch. Executive orders are proposed by federal agencies and issued by the President. They are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if they lack support from statute or the Constitution.

While executive orders carry the force of law within the executive branch, they cannot generate new laws. Instead, they provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented and enforced. Executive orders are binding instructions to federal agencies and officials, and they must comply with them unless overturned by the courts or superseded by legislation.

Executive orders have been used by Presidents to restrict public access to information, such as in the case of Executive Order 13233 issued by President George W. Bush. They have also been used to take immediate actions, such as the pardon of Jan. 6 defendants by President Donald Trump. Wars have also been fought upon executive order, although these have also had authorizing resolutions from Congress.

In conclusion, executive orders are directives from the President that manage the operations of the federal government. They carry the force of law within the executive branch but cannot create new laws. Executive orders can be overturned by the courts or superseded by legislation if they lack constitutional or statutory support.

They are numbered consecutively and published in the Federal Register

Executive orders are official documents through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government. They are numbered consecutively and published in the Federal Register, the official daily journal of the federal government. The Federal Register Act of 1936 put in place the system that is still used today. The Department of State began numbering executive orders in 1907, working backward to assign numbers to all of the orders on file since 1862. Executive Order 1, issued by President Lincoln on October 20, 1862, established a provisional court in Louisiana during the American Civil War.

Executive orders are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if they lack support by statute or the Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that all executive orders from the president must be supported by the Constitution, whether from a clause granting specific power or by Congress delegating authority to the executive branch. Specifically, such orders must be rooted in Article II of the Constitution or enacted by Congress in statutes.

While there is no explicit provision in the Constitution for executive orders, Section 1 of Article II (the Executive Power) is generally viewed as granting authority for such orders. Sections 3 and 4 of Article II provide potential limitations on executive action, stating that the President shall "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" and providing for impeachment and removal of the President in cases of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Executive orders are often controversial, as critics argue that they are used to make laws without congressional approval and move existing laws away from their original mandates. For example, President George W. Bush's Executive Order 13233 in 2001 restricted public access to the papers of former presidents, which was criticised by the Society of American Archivists and other groups. However, every American president has issued at least one executive order, totalling more than 13,731 since George Washington took office in 1789.

They carry the force of law but cannot generate new laws

Executive orders are directives issued by the President of the United States that carry the force of law. They are used to manage the operations of the federal government and have the same power as federal laws. While they cannot generate new laws, they can direct federal agencies on how to implement existing laws and statutes.

Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests executive powers in the President, making them the commander-in-chief and requiring them to "'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.'" This means that the President is responsible for ensuring that the laws are carried out faithfully and impartially. Executive orders are one tool that the President can use to fulfil this duty.

While executive orders have the force of law, they cannot override federal laws and statutes. The U.S. Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of the government holds more power than the others. This means that the President cannot use executive orders to sidestep the legislative process or take over powers from other branches, such as the power of Congress to pass new statutes or the power of the courts to invalidate laws as unconstitutional.

To be valid, executive orders must be rooted in the Constitution or enacted by Congress in statutes. They must be supported by either an expressed or implied congressional law or the Constitution itself. Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be overturned if they lack support by statute or the Constitution.

In summary, while executive orders carry the force of law, they cannot generate new laws. They are tools used by the President to manage the operations of the federal government and ensure the faithful execution of existing laws.

They can be challenged in court and overturned by Congress

Executive orders can be challenged in court and overturned by Congress. While they are directives issued by the President of the United States to manage operations of the federal government, they are not above the law. Executive orders must comply with the Constitution and other laws passed by Congress. They are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if they lack support by statute or the Constitution.

For example, in 1952, President Harry Truman's Executive Order 10340, which placed all the country's steel mills under federal control, was found to be invalid by the Supreme Court in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer. The court ruled that the executive order attempted to make law, rather than clarify or further a law put forth by Congress or the Constitution. This highlights that while executive orders carry the force of law, they cannot generate new laws and must be rooted in the Constitution or enacted by Congress.

Executive orders can be challenged in court on the grounds that they are unconstitutional or violate existing laws. In 2001, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13233, which restricted public access to the papers of former presidents. This order was criticized by groups such as the Society of American Archivists, who argued that it violated existing U.S. law on access to presidential papers and potentially undermined the foundations of the nation. As a result, the order was subsequently revoked by President Barack Obama in 2009.

Additionally, Congress has the power to override an executive order by passing legislation that renders it moot. However, this would require presidential approval, as with all laws. In cases where an executive order exceeds the authority of the President or could be better handled through legislation, Congress can also block or overturn the order. For instance, the 1999 Kosovo War, which was fought upon executive order by President Bill Clinton, also had an authorizing resolution from Congress, demonstrating that executive orders related to military power are still subject to congressional approval.

Executive orders must comply with the Constitution and other laws passed by Congress

Executive orders are a common feature of the modern American presidency. Every American president since George Washington has issued at least one, with over 13,700 issued in total. Executive orders are directives issued by the president that manage the operations of the federal government. They are signed, written, and published, and they follow a strict format and documentation system.

While they are not laws passed by Congress, they do possess the force of law within the executive branch's authority. They are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if they lack support by statute or the Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that all executive orders must be supported by the Constitution or enacted by Congress in statutes.

Presidents are generally careful to cite the specific laws under which they act when issuing executive orders. When they believe their authority stems from the powers outlined in the Constitution, the order proclaims "under the authority vested in me by the Constitution." While executive orders can provide guidance on how existing laws are implemented, they cannot generate new laws.

Frequently asked questions