Planned Communities: Enforcing Dumb Laws?

While there are many laws in place to protect communities, some are considered dumb or harmful. For example, in some US states, it is illegal to carry an ice cream cone in your back pocket, or to collect seaweed at night. In Pennsylvania, the Uniform Planned Community Act (UPCA) regulates planned communities, and each community has its own set of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) enforced by a homeowners' association (HOA). While some of these rules may seem unreasonable, such as restricting what colour you can paint your house, they are legally enforceable and non-compliance can result in fines or lawsuits. This raises the question: to what extent can planned communities enforce laws that may be considered dumb or harmful, and what rights do residents have to challenge these laws?

Homeowners' associations (HOAs) enforce rules and restrictions on property maintenance

Homeowners' associations (HOAs) are organisations that make and enforce rules and guidelines for planned communities. They are governed by a board of directors or governors elected by homeowners to make decisions and enforce rules. The HOA's "Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions" (CC&Rs) is a legal document that outlines what homeowners can and can't do with their homes. CC&Rs are created and enforced by the HOA and may include restrictions and requirements on property maintenance. For example, CC&Rs might require homeowners to mow their lawns and keep them weed-free, or restrict what colour they can paint their house.

When purchasing a home in an HOA community, homeowners are typically required to sign a series of papers, including an agreement to abide by the CC&Rs. Homeowners may face penalties, including fines or foreclosure, if they violate the CC&Rs. In addition to the CC&Rs, HOAs may also have bylaws that establish how the HOA is run and outline the division of responsibilities between the HOA and community members. HOAs also typically require members to pay monthly maintenance charges and special one-time assessments for large community expenses.

While HOAs can provide benefits such as recreational facilities, it is important for prospective homeowners to understand their rights and the potential restrictions imposed by the HOA. More and more states are regulating what HOAs can and cannot do, and homeowners may have legal protections against unreasonable restrictions or discriminatory practices. Homeowners should carefully review the CC&Rs and bylaws before purchasing a home in an HOA community and be aware of any unique rules and regulations.

HOAs can penalise residents for violations, including fines and lawsuits

When buying a home in a planned community, individuals generally sign a series of papers, including a declaration that they have read and agreed to abide by the HOA's Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). The HOA enforces the CC&Rs and may penalise residents for violations.

CC&Rs are a legal document that outlines what homeowners can and cannot do with their homes. For example, CC&Rs might limit the colour residents can paint their house, prohibit laundry from being left out to dry, or specify the type of mailbox that can be installed. They can also require homeowners to maintain their lawns and keep them free of weeds, or restrict what they can do with their garage space.

If a resident violates the CC&Rs, they may face various penalties, including fines and even foreclosure. The HOA can also place a lien on a resident's home if they fail to pay dues or assessments. In addition, failing to comply with CC&Rs can lead to legal disputes and enforcement actions, potentially resulting in liens or lawsuits from the HOA.

In Pennsylvania, planned communities consisting of more than 12 units and formed after 3 February 1997 are subject to the Uniform Planned Community Act (UPCA). The UPCA creates obligations for homeowners associations to ensure fairness for all housing unit owners. For example, the ownership of a planned community is required to place deposits into an escrow account or obtain a corporate surety bond before collecting deposits on units within the community.

Planned communities must comply with the Uniform Planned Community Act (UPCA)

In 1996, Pennsylvania adopted the Uniform Planned Community Act (UPCA) to establish a statutory model for planned communities, also known as homeowners' associations (HOAs). The UPCA came into effect on February 2, 1997, and applies to all planned communities in Pennsylvania with more than 12 units.

The UPCA creates a uniform framework for the operation and governance of these communities, ensuring fairness for all homeowners. One of its key requirements is that the ownership of a planned community must place deposits into an escrow account or obtain a corporate surety bond or irrevocable letter of credit with a government-insured financial institution before collecting deposits on units. This provision aims to protect homeowners' financial interests.

Additionally, the UPCA outlines the obligations and restrictions that come with owning a property in a planned community. When purchasing a home in an HOA community, individuals acquire the responsibility to pay regular assessments and abide by the community's rules and regulations, known as Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). These CC&Rs cover various aspects of community living, including property maintenance, exterior appearance, and the use of common facilities.

For example, CC&Rs might restrict the colour homeowners can paint their houses, prohibit laundry from being left out to dry, or specify mailbox types. While most CC&Rs are reasonable and widely accepted, some may interfere with homeowners' plans or seem unreasonable. It is essential for individuals to understand their rights and obligations under the CC&Rs before purchasing a property in a planned community.

Overall, the UPCA provides a comprehensive framework for the functioning of planned communities in Pennsylvania, ensuring fairness, transparency, and compliance with financial and governance regulations.

Communities are often told they have no power to make critical decisions on their own

In the United States, communities are often told they have no power to make critical decisions on their own. This is due to a legal structure that privileges corporate decision-making over community self-governance. Corporations have court-conferred constitutional "rights" that allow them to eliminate local efforts that may interfere with their plans to expand their operations, regardless of the impact on communities and the environment.

This dynamic is evident in the enforcement of planned community laws, which are governed by the Uniform Planned Community Act (UPCA) in states like Pennsylvania. The UPCA, which applies to planned communities with more than 12 units, mandates that homeowners' associations (HOAs) enforce Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that dictate everything from property maintenance to the colour of a house. While some CC&Rs make sense and are easy to accept, others may seem unreasonable, such as restrictions on garage usage or mailbox type. Failure to comply with CC&Rs can result in fines, liens, or lawsuits from the HOA.

The power dynamic between communities and corporations is further exacerbated by regulatory agencies that regulate the amount of harm inflicted on communities rather than providing protection. Additionally, the legal system grants landowners the right to damage the environment, with the entire community bearing the consequences. As a result, communities are boxed in by a legal system that protects corporate interests and limits their rights to local self-governance.

However, it is important to note that communities are not entirely powerless. In the context of planned communities, individuals who purchase homes in an HOA community agree to abide by the CC&Rs and have legal protections against unreasonable restrictions or discriminatory practices. More and more states are regulating what HOAs can and cannot do, and individuals can take legal action if their rights are violated. Additionally, communities are joining movements that recognize, secure, and protect the rights of all those living within them, challenging the notion that they are powerless in the face of corporate interests.

Communities are boxed in by a legal system that protects corporate interests over their own

Planned communities are governed by a set of rules and regulations, known as Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), enforced by homeowners' associations (HOAs). While these rules often pertain to property maintenance and community standards, they can sometimes interfere with residents' plans or seem unreasonable. For instance, an HOA might restrict parking on the street or limit the colour a resident can paint their house. Failure to comply with CC&Rs can result in fines, lawsuits, or even foreclosure.

However, it is essential to recognize that the legal framework governing planned communities and HOAs is influenced by a broader legal system that often prioritizes corporate interests over community rights. This dynamic is evident in several ways. Firstly, communities are often constrained by laws that protect corporate decision-making and confer constitutional "rights" on corporations, enabling them to override local efforts that may interfere with their expansion plans. This imbalance of power allows corporations to pursue their interests at the expense of communities and the environment.

Secondly, regulatory agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, which should ideally safeguard communities, instead regulate the extent of harm inflicted on them. This regulatory fallacy perpetuates a system where corporate interests take precedence over the well-being of communities and the natural environment. For instance, nuisance laws, which are intended to maintain community safety, can sometimes have unintended consequences, such as deterring victims of domestic violence from seeking police assistance for fear of eviction.

Furthermore, communities are often told they lack the authority to make critical decisions, such as banning fossil fuel extraction, raising the minimum wage, or implementing sustainable food systems, as these choices would conflict with corporate "rights" and state laws that favour wealthy interests. This dynamic underscores how communities are boxed in by a legal system that upholds corporate profits over their autonomy and self-governance.

To address these injustices, communities must recognize their power to challenge this oppressive structure of law and demand freedom and self-determination. By working together and joining movements that secure and protect the rights of all community members, it is possible to counter the exploitation perpetuated by a legal system skewed towards corporate interests.

Frequently asked questions