Pardon Power: State Laws And Presidential Limits

The U.S. President has the power to issue pardons to individuals involved in criminal investigations, but this power is not unlimited. While the President can pardon anyone who commits a federal offense against the United States or the District of Columbia, they cannot pardon violations of state laws. This means that state law enforcement authorities can review and prosecute criminal allegations without presidential intervention.

Presidents can only pardon federal offences

The U.S. President has the power to grant clemency and issue pardons to individuals involved in criminal investigations. This power is extremely broad and is vested by the Constitution in the President. However, it is not unlimited.

The President can only pardon federal offences and cannot interfere with state prosecutions or violations of state laws. This is because the pardon power is granted for offences against the United States. The President may pardon anyone who commits a federal offence against the United States or the District of Columbia. For example, President Gerald Ford pardoned his predecessor, Richard Nixon, for "all offences against the United States" that he may have committed during his term in office in relation to the Watergate scandal.

The presidential pardon is the only means by which a person convicted of a federal felony may obtain relief from federal firearms disabilities. A pardon erases any punishment and guilt of the pardoned person and restores their civil rights. However, it does not remove an offence from a person's criminal record.

The Supreme Court has, on occasion, grappled with the extent of the pardon power. In United States v. Wilson (1833), President Andrew Jackson granted a pardon to George Wilson, who had robbed the U.S. Mail and endangered a mail carrier. Wilson refused the pardon, and the Supreme Court held that his rejection was valid and that the pardon must be introduced to the court to be considered as a point of fact and evidence.

Presidents cannot pardon state crimes

The President of the United States has the power to pardon individuals who commit federal offences against the United States and the District of Columbia. However, this power does not extend to violations of state laws.

The Constitution establishes the President's authority to grant clemency, which includes the power to pardon individuals and commute their sentences. The presidential pardon is an "act of grace" that exempts the individual from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. While the president may offer a pardon, the recipient must accept it for it to take effect.

The presidential pardon power is broad but not unlimited. It is confined to federal offences and does not apply to state or local offences. State law enforcement authorities can review criminal allegations and determine if they constitute a state offence without presidential intervention.

The presidential pardon cannot erase a conviction, but it can eliminate the associated penalties and disabilities. It is important to note that a pardon does not equate to a determination of innocence. It is typically granted when the applicant has accepted responsibility for the crime and demonstrated good conduct after their conviction or release.

Pardons can be rejected by the convict

The President of the United States can pardon anyone who commits a federal offense against the United States and the District of Columbia. However, the President cannot pardon violations of state laws. A pardon erases any punishment and guilt of the pardoned person and restores their civil rights. Nevertheless, it does not remove an offense from a person's criminal record.

While the president may tender a pardon, the pardoned person must accept it. In the case of United States v. Wilson (1833), President Andrew Jackson granted a pardon to George Wilson, who robbed the U.S. Mail and endangered a mail carrier. However, Wilson refused to accept the pardon, and as a result, the judiciary could not enforce it, and it did not affect his guilt or punishment. This case set a precedent, demonstrating that pardons can be rejected by the convict.

In Burdick v. United States (1915), another case involving a rejected pardon, a man invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify before a federal grand jury. Similarly, in the 1900s, there were two other cases where individuals refused clemency from the president. These cases highlight that the acceptance of a pardon is not always a given and that convicts have the agency to reject presidential pardons.

The power to pardon is not without limitations. The president's pardoning power only extends to criminal offenses and does not preclude civil actions. For example, the Supreme Court held that the president could pardon a person jailed for criminal contempt of court but not for civil contempt. This distinction underscores the importance of understanding the scope and limitations of the president's pardoning authority.

Pardons do not erase convictions

A pardon is an expression of the President's forgiveness and can be granted when the applicant has accepted responsibility for the crime and demonstrated good conduct for a significant period after their conviction or the completion of their sentence. It is important to note that a pardon does not signify innocence or remove the conviction from a person's criminal record.

While a pardon absolves the pardoned person from guilt and punishment, it does not erase their criminal history or the fact of their conviction. The offense and the pardon will both appear on the person's criminal record. This means that courts may still consider a prior pardoned offense when sentencing for a subsequent conviction. For example, in Carlesi v. New York (1914), the Supreme Court held that a pardoned offense could be considered as a circumstance of aggravation under a state habitual-offender law.

The pardoned individual must petition the court for an expungement to remove the pardoned offenses from their criminal record. However, even with an expungement, certain types of criminal records, such as sex offender registries, may not be completely wiped clean. Additionally, pardons and expungements do not erase the crime from public knowledge or media reports. While the legal record may be cleared, news reports or other public documents that reported on the crime at the time of its occurrence will still exist.

In summary, while a pardon can grant relief from punishment and restore certain civil rights, it does not erase the conviction or the individual's criminal record. The conviction may still be considered in subsequent proceedings, and the individual may need to take additional steps to fully clear their record.

Pardons restore civil rights

A pardon is an act of official forgiveness, and it can restore civil rights to those who have been convicted of a crime. In the United States, the President has the power to grant clemency, which includes the ability to pardon individuals who have committed federal crimes or crimes against the District of Columbia. This power is derived from Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which states that the President "shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."

The restoration of civil rights through a pardon can vary depending on the state and the specific circumstances of the case. In Georgia, for example, a pardon is granted at the Board's discretion to individuals who have maintained a good reputation in their community following the completion of their sentence. The pardon is attached to the individual's criminal record as an official statement of forgiveness, but it does not erase the conviction. It serves as a means for the individual to advance in employment or education and restore certain civil rights, such as the right to run for and hold public office, serve on a jury, or serve as a Notary Public.

In Florida, there is a similar process for restoring civil rights, including the right to vote, for felony offenders who have completed their sentences, with some exceptions for certain types of offences. The restoration of voting rights does not require a clemency application and is automatic upon the completion of all terms of the sentence, including any outstanding legal financial obligations.

While a pardon can restore civil rights, it is important to note that it does not expunge or remove the conviction from an individual's criminal record. The pardon will be noted on the record, but the original offense will remain. If an individual wishes to have the offense removed from their record, they must go through a separate process of record expungement or restriction, which may be available depending on the state and the specific circumstances.

Additionally, a pardon does not imply innocence or overturn a conviction. It is a recognition of the applicant's acceptance of responsibility for the crime and their established good conduct following the conviction or completion of their sentence. The pardon serves to remove civil disabilities and restrictions imposed due to the conviction, such as the right to vote, hold office, or sit on a jury, and it can lessen the stigma associated with the conviction.

In certain cases, a pardon can also provide relief from federal firearms disabilities that arise from a federal felony conviction. According to Supreme Court case law, a state restoration of civil rights does not remove these firearms disabilities, and a presidential pardon is currently the only means to obtain relief from them.

Frequently asked questions