Administration's Power: Can They Issue Laws?

Administrative law is a complex and dynamic field of law that governs the creation and operation of administrative agencies and the exercise of government authority. These agencies, established by Congress through enabling legislation, are tasked with administering, enforcing, and regulating various federal laws. While they possess significant powers, administrative agencies must act within Constitutional boundaries, as outlined in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The APA provides a framework for the roles, procedures, and powers of these agencies, ensuring uniformity and openness in their functions. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have demonstrated a growing skepticism of administrative power and a willingness to question government regulation, potentially leading to new limits on agency authority. Administrative law also varies across different countries, with Germany and the Netherlands having their own unique approaches to regulating administrative actions.

Administrative law attorneys

In the context of federal administrative law, this includes national issues managed by agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Department of Homeland Security. Regulatory agencies are central to this process and can be part of the executive branch or independent agencies, such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These agencies enforce laws that reflect legislative intentions while adapting to the dynamic needs of the sectors they oversee.

Agencies' powers and limits

Agencies are bureaucratic institutions that implement, manage, and administer the law and public policy. They are created through their own organic statutes, which establish new laws and create the respective agencies to interpret, administer, and enforce those laws. Agencies are delegated power by Congress or, in the case of a state agency, the state legislature. Federal agencies exist because Congress has determined that a problem needs regulatory oversight.

Agencies have quasi-legislative authority to issue rules and adjudicate. They can rule on applications for benefits or licenses and enforce laws within their delegated power. Agencies can also issue interpretive rulings or guidance letters explaining their stance on certain rules, but without the force of law. In their adjudicatory functions, agencies have their own judicial body, known as the Administrative Law Judge, who is part of the agency but must remain independent from the agency officials involved in certain actions.

The powers of agencies are vast, but they must act within Constitutional and statutory parameters. These limits have been codified into a statute known as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which provides for the roles and powers of agencies and the procedures they must follow. The APA categorizes administrative functions into formal and informal rule-making and adjudication, which have binding effects, and guidance, which does not. The APA also prescribes certain procedural rules that agencies must follow before acting.

The separation of powers is a view that a single entity cannot be trusted with unlimited authority. If agency officials are not checked, they may pursue extreme ideologies or promote the interests of a political party. The separation of powers helps ensure that agencies follow existing laws and rules and improves their incentives and operations.

The President and the Attorney General provide authoritative interpretations of the law for the executive branch, and their opinions on legal questions are controlling on all employees in the conduct of their official duties. The executive branch has control over the implementation of laws through the appointment of different agency heads and staffing within selected departments.

Agencies' creation and operation

Agencies are an integral part of the legal system in the United States and worldwide, playing a significant role in various transactions and business structures. The creation and operation of agencies involve several key steps and considerations to ensure their effectiveness and compliance with legal requirements.

Creation of Agencies

The formation of an agency relationship typically occurs between a principal and an agent, where the principal confers their rights to the agent, authorising them to act on their behalf. This relationship is established through a contract, which can be express or implied. The consent of both parties is necessary, and their intentions must be clear. In some cases, an agency may also arise by operation of law, where certain individuals are automatically considered agents of another by virtue of their legal status, such as partners in a partnership or promoters in a company.

Operation of Agencies

Agency operations refer to the day-to-day activities and processes involved in running an agency. It includes various functional areas such as administration, finance, human resources, project management, client services, and marketing. Effective agency operations focus on creating a positive customer experience, maintaining a productive work environment, and ensuring profitability. This involves strategic client and project management, resource allocation, financial management, and quality control. The person responsible for agency operations management, typically the operations manager or Chief Operating Officer (COO), plays a crucial role in facilitating team collaboration and ensuring efficient operations.

Termination of Agencies

The relationship between a principal and an agent can be terminated by the acts or agreement of the parties or by operation of law. The timeframe for termination can be stipulated by statute or agreement, and upon termination, the agent's right to act on behalf of the principal ceases.

Agencies' independence

In the United States, independent agencies are agencies that exist outside the federal executive departments and the Executive Office of the President. They are created by Congress to supervise areas that are too complex and dynamic to be regulated by the passage of a statute or subsumed within an existing agency. These agencies are not subject to direct presidential control, and the president generally cannot remove their leaders without good cause.

Independent agencies include executive agencies and regulatory agencies. Executive agencies include the Department of Justice and the Department of Defense. Regulatory agencies, on the other hand, can be part of the executive branch or independent agencies. They regulate specific sectors such as telecommunications (Federal Communications Commission) and financial markets (Securities and Exchange Commission).

The creation of independent agencies is based on the recognition that Congress cannot enforce and administer every law it enacts. These agencies are established through their own organic statutes, which grant them the authority to regulate and control specific areas or industries. The regulations enacted by these agencies have the full force and power of federal law.

The Supreme Court has played a significant role in shaping the principles surrounding the structure and removal processes of independent agencies. The Court has ruled that courts should not grant blind deference to the statutory interpretations of administrative agencies. Instead, they must independently interpret statutes and ensure that agencies engage in "reasoned decision-making" within established boundaries.

In conclusion, independent agencies play a crucial role in administering various aspects of the federal government's power and authority. They are characterized by their independence from direct presidential control and their specialized focus on specific areas of regulation. The creation and operation of these agencies are governed by administrative law, which ensures a just and orderly society through the implementation and enforcement of laws.

Agencies' quasi-judicial functions

Administrative agencies have executive, quasi-legislative, and quasi-judicial functions. The quasi-judicial function involves adjudicatory proceedings that address violations of laws or regulations in the area overseen by the agency. Quasi-judicial functions refer to activities undertaken by administrative bodies that are similar to judicial functions, involving the adjudication of disputes, interpretation of laws, and decision-making with legal implications.

A quasi-judicial function is a term that applies to the actions of public administrative officers or bodies who are required to investigate facts, hold hearings, and draw conclusions from them as a basis for their official action and to exercise discretion of a judicial nature. They have the authority to adjudicate disputes and make binding decisions that affect the rights and interests of individuals or organizations. Quasi-judicial bodies interpret and apply legal principles, statutes, regulations, and precedents to resolve cases brought before them. They usually depend on a predetermined set of guidelines or criteria to assess the nature and gravity of the permission or relief sought, or of the offense committed.

Decisions of a quasi-judicial body are often legally enforceable under the laws of a jurisdiction; they can be challenged in a court of law, which is the final decisive authority. In the United States, the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 was passed in response to concerns over the broad powers wielded by federal agencies. The APA granted courts the power to review agency actions and set standard procedures for agency rule-making that fostered public participation.

Frequently asked questions