The Power Dynamic: Can Congress Enforce The Law?

can congrees enforce the law

Congress has the power to enforce the law through appropriate legislation, as outlined in the US Constitution's 13th, 14th, 15th, 19th, 23rd, 24th, and 26th Amendments. This power has been used to abolish slavery, protect the rights of newly emancipated African-Americans, and uphold the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Supreme Court has also ruled that Congress can forbid practices that are not themselves unconstitutional, provided the law aims to prevent or remedy a situation.

Characteristics Values
Power to enforce the law Congress has the power to enforce laws by passing appropriate legislation
Fourteenth Amendment Congress can enforce the Fourteenth Amendment by passing federal laws to counteract and overrule state laws that violate it
Voting Rights Act of 1965 Congress can prohibit the enforcement of a state law if it is discriminatory in intent and effect, even if the judicial branch does not determine that the state law is prohibited by the Fourteenth Amendment
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Congress can forbid practices that are not themselves unconstitutional if the law is aimed at preventing or remedying unconstitutional practices

lawshun

The Fourteenth Amendment

Congress has the power to enforce the law through appropriate legislation. In the Civil Rights Cases, the Court observed that the legislation Congress is authorised to adopt is not general legislation upon the rights of the citizen, but corrective legislation. This means that Congress can pass laws to counteract and overrule state laws that are forbidden by the Constitution.

The most commonly used and frequently litigated phrase in the amendment is "equal protection of the laws", which has figured prominently in a wide variety of landmark cases, including Brown v. Board of Education (racial discrimination), Roe v. Wade (reproductive rights), Bush v. Gore (election recounts), Reed v. Reed (gender discrimination), and University of California v. Bakke (racial quotas in education).

lawshun

The Eighteenth Amendment

Congress has the power to enforce legislation, as stated in the Fourteenth Amendment: "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article". The Eighteenth Amendment, which established the prohibition of alcohol in the United States, was proposed by Congress on 18 December 1917 and ratified by the requisite number of states on 16 January 1919. It was the product of nationwide temperance movements, which attributed societal ills to alcohol and campaigned against its manufacture, sale, distribution and consumption. The Eighteenth Amendment declared the production, transport and sale of intoxicating liquors illegal, although it did not outlaw the actual consumption of alcohol. It also forbade the importation and exportation of beverage liquor to and from the United States. The Eighteenth Amendment was the only constitutional amendment in American history to be repealed, with the Twenty-first Amendment repealing it on 5 December 1933.

lawshun

The Thirteenth Amendment

Congress has the power to enforce the law, as stated in the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment, which was adopted during the Reconstruction period, primarily aimed to abolish slavery and protect the rights of newly emancipated African-Americans. The language used in the amendment is "The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation," with slight variations in subsequent amendments.

The power of Congress to enforce the law was further established in the Fourteenth Amendment, which states, "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." This amendment extended the powers of Congress beyond those originally enumerated in Article One, Section 8 of the Constitution, increasing federal power at the expense of individual states.

The Supreme Court has also ruled on the scope of Congressional power, concluding in the Katzenbach v. Morgan case (1966) that Congress can forbid practices that are not themselves unconstitutional if the law aims to prevent or remedy constitutional violations. Additionally, the Enforcement Acts of 1870 and 1871 further demonstrated Congress's power to enforce the law, as they granted Congress the authority to counteract and overrule state laws that conflicted with federal legislation.

Overall, the Thirteenth Amendment and subsequent amendments, court rulings, and legislation have established Congress's power to enforce the law, particularly in matters relating to civil rights and the protection of vulnerable populations.

lawshun

The Fifteenth Amendment

Congress has the power to enforce the law. In the Civil Rights Cases (1883), the Court observed that Congress can adopt corrective legislation to counteract and overrule state laws that are impermissible. In Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966), the Supreme Court concluded that Congress can forbid practices that are not themselves unconstitutional, if the law is aimed at preventing or remedying unconstitutionality.

> The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, colour, or previous condition of servitude.

lawshun

The Enforcement Acts

Congress has the power to enforce the law through appropriate legislation. This is included in a number of amendments to the United States Constitution, including Amendments XIII, XIV, XV, XIX, XXIII, XXIV, and XXVI. The Fourteenth Amendment states:

> The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, Congress can enforce the law, but only through "appropriate legislation".

This means that Congress can only enforce laws that are corrective in nature, i.e. laws that counteract and overrule state laws that are impermissible.

Yes. In the case of *Katzenbach v. Morgan* (1966), the Supreme Court concluded that Congress can forbid practices that are not themselves unconstitutional, as long as the law is aimed at preventing or remedying unconstitutional practices.

In *South Carolina v. Katzenbach* (1966), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that barred the application of English literacy requirements to a certain class of voters.

Yes. In the case of *Lassiter v. Northampton County Bd. of Elections* (1959), Justice Brennan said that Congress might have concluded that the requirements put forward by the state were unrelated to the justifications and discriminatory in intent and effect.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment