Congressional Power: Enforcing Laws Without The Justice Department?

Congress has the authority to regulate the ethics of the Supreme Court, including requiring justices to disclose their financial holdings and recuse themselves from cases in certain circumstances. However, Congress lacks the power to bring criminal charges or initiate criminal prosecutions. If a congressional investigation uncovers evidence of criminal activity, it can refer the matter to the Department of Justice for investigation and potential prosecution. This raises the question: can Congress enforce laws if the Justice Department does not?

Congress can investigate criminal conduct but cannot bring criminal charges

Congress has the power to regulate Supreme Court ethics and the duty to do so. This includes requiring justices to disclose their financial holdings and other sources of income, as well as regulating the recusal process. For example, since 1948, Congress has required justices to recuse themselves from cases in certain circumstances, such as when their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

However, there are shortcomings in the statutory framework created by Congress to regulate Supreme Court ethics. For instance, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have repeatedly failed to disclose lavish gifts from billionaires with ties to right-wing legal organisations. Nearly all of the justices have also failed to recuse themselves from cases in which they had financial connections to the litigants, and justices' spouses have benefited financially from law firms and nonprofit groups with business before the Court.

To address these issues, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act, which would require the Supreme Court to adopt a binding code of conduct and develop a process for enforcement.

Congress can refer matters to the Department of Justice for investigation and prosecution

Congress has the authority to regulate Supreme Court ethics and the duty to do so. This includes requiring justices to recuse themselves from cases in certain circumstances, such as when their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, and to disclose their financial holdings and other sources of income. Congress has also enacted ethics laws that apply to the executive branch to guard against corruption and abuse of power.

However, it is important to note that Congress should not encroach upon judicial independence in deciding cases or retaliate against justices for unpopular decisions. This would be an abuse of congressional power. Instead, Congress should focus on creating and enforcing ethical standards for the Supreme Court and ensuring transparency and accountability in the judicial system.

Congress can regulate Supreme Court ethics

Congress has the authority to regulate the ethics of the Supreme Court, and it has done so since 1948. Congress can investigate conduct that may be criminal, but it cannot bring criminal charges or initiate a criminal prosecution. Instead, Congress may refer the matter to the Department of Justice for investigation and potential prosecution.

Congress has required justices to recuse themselves from cases in certain circumstances, including when their impartiality might reasonably be questioned. However, the law does not provide a clear mechanism to challenge a justice's failure to recuse, which leaves discretion in the hands of justices with conflicts of interest. Congress has also required justices to disclose their financial holdings and other sources of income since 1978, with increased transparency requirements enacted on a bipartisan basis last year.

Despite these regulations, there have been repeated failures by justices to disclose gifts from individuals with ties to right-wing legal organisations, and failures to recuse themselves from cases in which they had financial connections to the litigants. This has led to criticism of the longstanding statutory framework created by Congress to regulate Supreme Court ethics.

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act, which would require the Supreme Court to adopt a binding code of conduct and develop a process for enforcement. Building on existing laws, Congress could increase disclosure requirements, strengthen the recusal process, and require Supreme Court justices to adhere to a binding code of conduct. This would help to guard against corruption and abuse of power in coequal branches of government, upholding the principle of checks and balances fundamental to the US constitutional system.

Congress can require justices to recuse themselves from cases in certain circumstances

Congress has also enacted ethics laws that apply to the executive branch, creating guardrails against corruption and abuse of power. These laws are in line with the principle of checks and balances that is fundamental to the US constitutional system.

While Congress can investigate conduct that may be criminal, it lacks the authority to bring criminal charges or initiate a criminal prosecution. If a congressional investigation uncovers evidence of criminal activity, it can refer the matter to the Department of Justice for further investigation and potential prosecution.

To address shortcomings in the current system, the Senate Judiciary Committee has proposed the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act. This act would require the Supreme Court to adopt a binding code of conduct and develop a process for enforcement, increasing transparency and accountability.

Congress can require justices to disclose their financial holdings

Congress has the authority to regulate Supreme Court ethics and the duty to do so. Congress can investigate conduct that may be criminal, but it lacks the authority to bring criminal charges or initiate a criminal prosecution. If a congressional investigation uncovers evidence of criminal activity, Congress may refer the matter to the Department of Justice for investigation and potential prosecution.

Congress has enacted ethics laws that apply to another coequal branch of government, the executive branch. These laws guard against corruption and abuse of power in coequal branches of government, which is fundamental to the principle of checks and balances in the US Constitution.

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act, which would require the Supreme Court to adopt a binding code of conduct and develop a process for enforcement.

Frequently asked questions