Jesus' Touch: Transgression Or Miracle?

Jesus' healing of a man with leprosy is recorded in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. According to the biblical accounts, Jesus touched the man, an act that was forbidden by Mosaic Law, and healed him. This has led to questions about whether Jesus broke the law and, if so, how this action should be interpreted.

Some argue that Jesus did break the law, but that this was justified by his divine status and the compassion that motivated the healing. Others assert that Jesus did not break the law because he was a priest, and priests were exempt from this particular restriction. Still, others suggest that Jesus did not break the spirit of the law, which was to prevent the spread of disease, as he was not at risk of being infected and, in fact, spread a cure.

This incident has been interpreted as a powerful symbol of Jesus' willingness to transcend legalism and embody divine compassion, as well as a foreshadowing of his role as the ultimate High Priest who takes on humanity's impurities and offers cleansing and healing.

Jesus technically broke Mosaic law by touching the leper

Jesus superseded the Levitical law, which forbids a clean person from touching an unclean person, and established his authority and power. He demonstrated a picture of what he would do for humanity as the suffering King on the cross. By touching the leper, Jesus took upon himself our unclean state and, in exchange, made us clean.

Jesus, as the Holy One and miracle Healer, was not defiled by coming into contact with the leper. Purity flowed from him to heal the leper. As a teacher of the Law, Jesus enacted the true intention of the Law, which was to establish a holy community of believers within the Kingdom of heaven. This healing action formed a step towards the coming of the Kingdom of heaven. Thus, the purity laws found their fulfilment in Jesus.

Jesus did not become impure or need to be purified after touching the leper because, as God, he was not at risk of being infected. While he broke the letter of the law, he did not break the spirit of the law. People were not supposed to touch lepers because the disease would spread, but Jesus touched the man so that the cure could spread.

Jesus, as a priest, also had the legal right to touch the leper. Though Jesus's priesthood was not according to the Law of Moses, he was a priest after the order of Melchizedek. As the ultimate priest, he had the legal right to touch the leper to convey cleansing to him.

Jesus did not sin by touching the leper because he was not contaminated

Jesus was not contaminated by touching the leper because he is God, and as God, he is pure and holy. As the Holy One, he could not be defiled by touching the leper. Instead, the leper was healed by Jesus' touch. Jesus' touch did not spread disease, but rather, the cure.

Jesus' touch did not spread disease because he had the power to heal. He could have healed the leper without touching him, but he chose to reach out and touch him. By touching the leper, Jesus demonstrated his concern for people and his willingness to break Jewish taboos to help the suffering.

Furthermore, Jesus was not contaminated by touching the leper because, as a priest, he was exempt from the restriction against touching lepers. While the average Israelite would have been made unclean by touching a leper, this restriction did not apply to priests. As a priest, Jesus had the legal right to touch the leper in order to convey cleansing to him.

Finally, it is important to note that ceremonial uncleanness is not the same as sin. Sexual intercourse between married people, for example, made them ceremonially unclean, but it was not a sin. Similarly, Jesus may have been ceremonially unclean by touching the leper, but he did not sin.

Jesus was ceremonially unclean but did not sin

Jesus was ceremonially unclean when he touched the leper. Leviticus 13 outlines specific procedures for dealing with a person suspected of being infected with leprosy. A priest would have to inspect the lesion, and after a period of monitoring and observation, if the condition did not improve, the person would be declared ritually "unclean". According to Leviticus 5:3, "If he touches human uncleanness, of whatever sort his uncleanness may be with which he becomes unclean, and it is hidden from him, and then he comes to know it, he will be guilty."

However, Jesus did not sin when he touched the leper. While he was ceremonially unclean, he did not break any moral laws. In fact, by touching the leper, Jesus demonstrated his power and authority as the Holy One and miracle Healer. As a teacher of the Law, Jesus enacted the true intention of the Law, which is to establish a holy community of believers within the Kingdom of heaven. This healing action forms a step towards the coming of the Kingdom of heaven.

Furthermore, Jesus did not need to touch the leper to heal him. He could have healed the leper with a word, as he did in other instances. By touching the leper, Jesus demonstrated his compassion and willingness to break Jewish taboos to help those who were suffering.

Additionally, it is important to note that Jesus, as the Son of God, was without sin and could not be defiled by touching the leper. He was the source of cleansing and purity, and so uncleanness had no power over him. In touching the leper, Jesus took on the man's uncleanness and set him free from his disease. This act was a symbol of what Jesus would later do on the cross, where he took on the sin of the world and made us clean.

Therefore, while Jesus was ceremonially unclean when he touched the leper, he did not sin. He fulfilled the spirit of the law, which was to bring healing and establish a holy community, and demonstrated his power and authority as the Son of God.

Jesus was not defiled by touching the leper

Jesus was also a priest, and priests were not prohibited from touching lepers. In fact, the law required priests to touch lepers as part of the cleansing ritual.

Furthermore, Jesus was not defiled by touching the leper because he is the source of cleanliness and purity. He took on the man's uncleanness and made him clean. This is symbolic of what Jesus did for humanity on the cross. By touching the leper, Jesus took on our unclean state and, in exchange, made us clean.

Jesus did not come to abolish the law but to fulfil it. He demonstrated his high regard for and commitment to the law when he "strictly warned" the healed leper to show himself to the priest and to offer "those things which Moses commanded, as a testimony to them".

Jesus was not subject to the ceremonial law

Firstly, Jesus was not subject to the ceremonial law because he was the source of cleansing. Uncleanliness did not have the power to stain him as it did others. Jesus was the Holy One, and the power to heal and cleanse flowed from him to the leper. As the ultimate, quintessential priest, he had the legal right to touch the leper.

Secondly, Jesus was not subject to the ceremonial law because he was God. As God, he was in no risk of being infected by leprosy. He was breaking the letter of the law, but not the spirit of the law. People were not supposed to touch lepers because the disease would spread, but Jesus touched the man so that the cure could spread.

Thirdly, Jesus was not subject to the ceremonial law because he was fulfilling the law. He came not to abolish the law but to fulfil it. He was enacting the true intention of the law, which was to establish a holy community of believers within the Kingdom of Heaven. This healing action formed a step towards the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven. Thus, the purity laws found their fulfilment in Jesus.

Finally, Jesus was not subject to the ceremonial law because he was sinless. The very definition of sin is the violation of God's law, and Jesus never violated any law of God. He set the perfect example of complete obedience.

Frequently asked questions