Conflict Of Interest Laws: Who Are They For?

Conflict of interest laws are an important aspect of maintaining ethical standards in government and public service. They are designed to prevent officials from making decisions that could be influenced by their private financial interests, rather than serving the public interest. While these laws primarily apply to public officials, conflicts of interest can arise in various sectors, including law, business, healthcare, and media. The presence of a conflict of interest does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing, but it creates a risk of biased decision-making that can undermine public trust. To maintain integrity, it is crucial for officials to identify and address these conflicts through recusal, abstention, or delegation.

Conflict of interest laws in the US

Public Officials and Employees

Public officials and employees are expected to put the interests of the public ahead of their personal interests. Conflict of interest laws are intended to prevent officials from making decisions that could be influenced by their private interests. In the US, conflict of interest laws apply to all levels of government, including federal, state, and municipal.

A conflict of interest arises when a public official's personal interests could impact their ability to make impartial decisions in their official capacity. This typically relates to financial interests, such as when a government decision could have a financial impact on the official's personal finances or other financial interests. For example, if a public official holds a significant investment in a company that is seeking a government contract, there is a risk that the official's decision-making process could be compromised.

To avoid actual bias or the appearance of impropriety, public officials are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and may be disqualified from participating in certain decisions. In some cases, they may be required to recuse themselves from discussions and votes, or even resign from their position to eliminate the conflict of interest.

Government Contractors and Researchers

Conflict of interest laws also apply to individuals and organizations doing business with the government, such as government contractors and researchers. For example, a government contractor must disclose any financial interests or relationships that could impact their ability to impartially perform their duties. Similarly, researchers receiving government funding must disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as financial ties to companies that could be affected by the research outcomes.

Preventing Conflicts of Interest

To prevent conflicts of interest, governments at all levels have adopted various policies and practices, including:

• Training in ethical awareness for public officials and employees.
• Clear and consistent policies on what constitutes a conflict of interest.
• Disclosure requirements for potential conflicts of interest.
• Disqualification, recusal, and delegation procedures for officials with conflicts of interest.
• "Sunshine laws" or policies that promote transparency and disclosure of information.

Conflict of interest laws in California

Conflict-of-interest laws are grounded on the notion that government officials owe their primary loyalty to the public. Thus, personal and private financial considerations on the part of governmental officials should not be allowed to enter the decision-making process.

In California, conflict-of-interest laws are designed to assist government officials in complying with the laws and to help the public and the news media understand these laws. The laws outline the requirements, interpretations, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure government officials avoid conflicts-of-interest situations.

Under California law, a public official has a disqualifying conflict of interest in a governmental decision if it is foreseeable that the decision will have a financial impact on their personal finances or other financial interests. This includes five types of interests: business entity, real property, income, gifts, and personal finances. If a conflict of interest is identified, the public official is prohibited from participating in the decision to avoid bias and maintain the public's trust.

There are limited exceptions to the conflict of interest rules. For instance, a public official may not be disqualified if the effect on their interests is indistinguishable from the effect on the public. Additionally, in rare circumstances, a public official may be required to participate in a decision if a quorum cannot be reached due to too many officials being disqualified. However, exceptions must be carefully considered, and officials are encouraged to seek guidance from agency counsel or the FPPC.

Conflict of interest laws for lawyers

Conflict of interest laws are not exclusive to public officials and are applicable to lawyers as well. Lawyers have a duty to zealously represent the interests of their client(s). In the event that the lawyer has two or more clients, these duties can conflict, making it impossible for the lawyer to fulfil both at once. For example, if a lawyer has both the plaintiff and defendant in a given case as clients, advocating for one will inherently go against the interests of the other.

The American Bar Association (ABA) has devised the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which all state bar associations have adapted to establish grounds for an attorney's professional responsibility to past, present, and future clients. An attorney may not represent two or more clients in the same or a substantially related matter.

Attorneys must take care to check for potential conflicts prior to accepting an individual as a client. As established by ABA Rule 1.7, a lawyer who believes themselves subject to a potential conflict of interest has a duty to notify their potential client or current client of that conflict. An attorney can only proceed with representing that client if they obtain written, informed consent from all clients affected by the conflict.

There are several ways in which conflicts of interest can develop:

• The attorney's interests conflict with the interests of the client. For instance, a client retains an attorney in a real estate purchase, but the attorney also made an offer on the same property.
• The client's interests conflict with the interests of another client. This sometimes happens in personal injury cases, where the insurer's attorney must represent the company and the client against a third person's claim.
• The client's interests conflict with a previous client's interests. The current client was the opposing party in a business transaction involving a former client's company.

Lawyers must balance representing a client's interests with giving sound legal advice. The attorney also has a duty to exercise independent professional judgment. Sometimes, this can sound like the lawyer putting their own interests ahead of the client.

Additionally, a lawyer's own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on the representation of a client. For example, if the probity of a lawyer's own conduct in a transaction is in serious question, it may be difficult or impossible for the lawyer to give a client detached advice.

Lawyers must also be mindful of conflicts of interest that can arise in situations outside the office or courtroom. Every state has its own laws about conflicts of interest and attorney discipline. If a client has a conflict of interest issue with their attorney, they should contact their state bar association.

Conflict of interest laws for government contractors

Conflict of interest laws are not only applicable to public officials but also to government contractors.

An Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) occurs when a contractor's performance on one government contract may compromise its ability to perform on another government contract or its ability to compete for a government contract in a fair way. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) defines an OCI as a situation where “because of other activities or relationships with other persons, a person is unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the Government, or the person’s objectivity in performing the contract work is or might be otherwise impaired, or a person has an unfair competitive advantage.”

There are three types of OCI:

• Unequal Access to Information: This occurs when a contractor has access to non-public information that may provide a competitive advantage in a competition for a different government contract.
• Impaired Objectivity: This happens when the nature of a contractor's work under one government contract could benefit its other contracts with the government.
• Biased Ground Rules: This occurs when a firm has helped set the ground rules for the procurement of a government contract and then submits a proposal for that contract.

Contracting agencies are responsible for determining whether an actual or apparent conflict of interest exists. If a conflict is found, it can lead to the contractor being excluded from a contract competition, having an existing contract terminated, or even being suspended or debarred from future government contracts.

Contractors should proactively identify potential OCIs and communicate with the contracting officer to agree on mitigation plans. These plans should be tailored to the specific situation and address prospective OCIs rather than retroactive solutions. Some strategies include establishing firewalls or security measures to block the flow of information, increasing government oversight, or removing conflicted subcontractors from the contract.

If mitigation is not possible, contractors can request a waiver from the government, which may be granted if the benefit to the government outweighs the risk of harm.

Conflict of interest laws for public officials' family members

Conflict of interest laws are designed to prevent public officials from exploiting their positions for personal financial gain, which could lead to biased decision-making that sacrifices the public interest. These laws apply to public officials globally, including in the US and Canada.

In the US, conflict of interest laws may extend to the family members of public officials. For example, the US Department of the Interior's (DOI) conflict of interest rules state that an employee may be required to recuse themselves from an assignment if it could benefit them, their family, or individuals outside their government job with whom they have a connection. This is to avoid any perception of bias and maintain the public's trust in government officials' impartiality.

Similarly, in Canada, the Conflict of Interest Act includes family members in its scope. The Act defines family members as a public office holder's spouse or common-law partner, as well as their dependent children and the dependent children of their spouse or common-law partner. It prohibits public office holders from using their positions to further the private interests of their relatives or accepting gifts or advantages that might influence their decisions.

In both the US and Canada, the focus is on preventing conflicts of interest that could arise from the financial interests of public officials and their family members. These laws aim to uphold the integrity of public service and maintain public trust in government decision-making.

Frequently asked questions