Employment Laws: Non-Profits And At-Will Rules Explained

Employment at-will is a concept in labour law that allows employers to dismiss an employee for any reason, without warning, and without having to establish just cause for termination. This concept applies to non-profit organisations in the same way it does to for-profit companies. In the US, federal labour laws that apply to for-profit companies also apply to non-profit charities. However, there are certain exceptions to at-will employment, which vary by state. For example, an employer may not terminate an employee for filing a workers' compensation claim after an on-the-job injury, or for refusing to violate the law at the employer's request.

Non-profits are subject to federal labor laws

Non-profit organizations are not exempt from federal labor laws in the US. They are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that sets minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping, and child labor standards. The FLSA applies to non-profit organizations with an annual gross volume of sales or business of at least $500,000, or those that engage in ordinary commercial activities that result in sales or business, such as operating a gift shop or providing veterinary services for a fee.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) also applies to non-profits and develops worker safety procedures. While non-profits are not subject to penalties for non-compliance, they are still required to conduct OSHA-approved worker safety classes.

Additionally, non-profits that qualify as "tax-exempt" are still required to pay payroll taxes and Social Security payments for their employees. They must also comply with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which allows employees to take up to twelve weeks of unpaid leave for medical or personal reasons without losing their job.

Non-profits must also comply with minimum wage laws and, in most states, obtain workers' compensation insurance. They are also encouraged to have access to a professional to consult on employment laws and human resource management practices.

While volunteers are treated differently than employees under the law, non-profits must differentiate between their unpaid volunteers and interns and their paid employees.

Non-profits must differentiate between employees and volunteers

Non-profit organisations are not exempt from state and federal employment laws. In fact, federal labor laws that apply to for-profit companies also apply to non-profit charities. This includes the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets minimum wage, overtime, record-keeping, and child labor standards. The FLSA applies to non-profit organisations that engage in ordinary commercial activities, such as operating a gift shop or providing veterinary services for a fee.

Non-profit organisations must also comply with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which allows workers to take up to twelve weeks of unpaid leave for medical or personal issues without the risk of losing their job. Additionally, non-profits that qualify as "tax-exempt" are still required to pay payroll taxes and Social Security payments for their employees.

It is important to differentiate between employees and volunteers in a non-profit organisation. Volunteers are individuals who choose to provide services to a non-profit without any expectation of compensation. Volunteers are generally not considered employees under the FLSA and are allowed to freely volunteer for charitable and public service purposes. However, volunteers cannot engage in commercial activities run by a non-profit, such as working in a gift shop. Paid employees of a non-profit are also not allowed to volunteer to provide the same type of services they are employed to provide.

To ensure compliance with employment laws, non-profits should have access to professionals who can provide guidance and expertise on employment laws and human resource management practices. This can include consulting with insurance brokers, payroll companies, and state associations of non-profits. Additionally, having a written policy or employee handbook can help non-profits treat employees consistently and fairly, manage expectations, and set standards for employees to follow.

At-will employment can be overridden

At-will employment is a dynamic that changes the relationship between an employee and an employer. It is uncommon on a global scale, with the overwhelming majority of developed countries not utilizing an at-will employment structure. However, in the United States, at-will employment is the norm, with 49 out of 50 states employing this structure.

The at-will employment doctrine can be overridden in several ways. Firstly, it can be overridden by an express or written contract that promises job security and outlines specific reasons for termination. For example, a two-year contract may state that an employee can only be fired during the contract term for committing a crime. If an employee is fired for any other reason not specified in the contract, they may have a legal claim against their employer for breach of contract.

Secondly, at-will employment can be overridden by civil service statutes in the case of government employees. For instance, the Montana Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA) provides legal grounds for wrongful discharge, including retaliation for an employee's refusal to violate public policy or an employee's completion of a probationary period.

Thirdly, at-will employment can be overridden by public policy exceptions. Employers cannot terminate their relationship with an employee if that employee refuses to violate the law on their behalf or perform an action that violates public policy. Public policy exemption also prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for performing public duties or obligations, such as jury duty or military service. Additionally, employees are protected from termination if they report their employer for violating the law, utilize workers' compensation, or exercise their legal rights, such as taking family and medical leave or serving in the military.

Fourthly, at-will employment can be overridden by implied contract exceptions, which are verbal or non-formalized agreements between an employee and employer. These agreements indicate stable employment for a specified period or state that an employee cannot be terminated for a specific reason. If an employee's termination directly contradicts the implied contract, they can cite the implied contract exception as a rebuttal. However, implied contract exceptions are challenging to prove, as they often lack a paper trail or irrefutable evidence, and the burden of proof rests on the employee.

Lastly, at-will employment can be overridden by "implied-in-law" contracts, which have been recognized by eleven US states as an exception. Court interpretations of this exception have varied, with some requiring "just cause" for termination and others denying terminations made for malicious reasons, such as terminating a long-tenured employee to avoid paying accrued retirement benefits.

It is important to note that while at-will employment gives employers significant freedom to hire and fire, they must still follow guidelines and cannot terminate employees for reasons that violate the law, such as discrimination or retaliation for protected actions.

At-will employees have some rights

At-will employees do have some rights, though their employment can be terminated at any time, for any reason, without penalty. In the US, every state except Montana presumes employment to be "at will". In this arrangement, an employer can reduce paid time off, decrease pay, or terminate health insurance for any reason, except illegal reasons or when a contract specifies otherwise.

At-will employees have the right to quit their job at any time and for any reason. They cannot be compelled to provide "two weeks' notice" before leaving, though doing so is generally considered good practice. They also have the right to practice their religious beliefs without interference from work, and to take time off for medical reasons, including disability and pregnancy.

At-will employees are also protected from being fired for reasons that are illegal under state and federal law. For example, an at-will employee cannot be fired because of their race, religion, gender, national origin, or disability. They are also protected if they have complained about illegal activity, discrimination or harassment, or about health and safety violations in the workplace.

At-will employees cannot be fired for exercising their civil rights, such as serving on a jury, voting, or serving in the National Guard. They are also protected under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).

At-will employment is controversial

At-will employment is a highly controversial topic in the United States. While it is the default rule in most states, it remains a central topic of debate, especially concerning the macroeconomic efficiency of allowing employers to terminate employees summarily and arbitrarily.

At-will employment refers to an employer's ability to dismiss an employee for any reason, without having to establish "just cause" for termination and without warning, as long as the reason is not illegal (e.g. firing due to the employee's gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or disability status). This practice is advantageous for employers as it allows them to make changes to their workforce with limited legal repercussions. It also enables them to amend benefits, change pay structures, and modify paid time off without consequences. Additionally, at-will employment offers greater protection for employers against disgruntled ex-employees who may seek legal action.

However, at-will employment is controversial due to the power dynamic it creates between employers and employees. Critics argue that the employment relationship is characterized by an inherent inequality of bargaining power, with employers holding significantly more influence. This dynamic can make it challenging for employees to advocate for themselves or negotiate better terms, as employers have the unilateral right to terminate their employment at any time.

Another point of contention is the financial burden placed on employees. Without the security of stable employment, at-will workers may struggle to plan for their future, access loans, or make significant financial decisions. This uncertainty can lead to increased stress and anxiety, potentially impacting their overall well-being and quality of life.

Furthermore, at-will employment can hinder employee retention. Without adequate training, competitive pay, benefits, and a positive work environment, employees may be more inclined to leave their jobs, especially if they feel their individual career goals are not being met. This turnover can result in higher costs for employers, who constantly have to invest in recruiting and training new staff.

While at-will employment offers flexibility and leverage for employees, it also creates a precarious situation where their livelihoods can be abruptly disrupted. This lack of job security can affect various aspects of their lives, from their financial stability to their mental health and overall well-being.

The controversy surrounding at-will employment highlights the ongoing debate between prioritizing employer autonomy and protecting employee rights in the United States.

Frequently asked questions