The Physics Of Other Worlds Explained

Do the laws of physics apply on other planets? This question delves into the heart of physics and the fundamental rules that govern our universe. It's a topic that has intrigued scientists and sparked debates, with some suggesting that the laws of physics might not be as universal as we once thought. Recent controversial findings indicate that one of the constants of nature, the fine-structure constant, may exhibit slight variations in different parts of the cosmos, challenging Einstein's equivalence principle, which asserts that the laws of physics are consistent throughout the universe. This discovery has sparked discussions about the potential impact on our understanding of the universe and the possibility of alternate sets of laws governing other regions of space.

Do the laws of physics change over time and space?

The laws of physics may change over time and space. Scientists have been testing the constancy of the laws of physics and have found some evidence that suggests that the laws of physics may change over time and space. However, these findings are not yet widely accepted.

The Laws of Physics as We Know Them

The laws of physics, as we know them, are assumed to be constant across the universe. This assumption is based on Einstein's equivalence principle, which states that the laws of physics are the same everywhere. However, recent studies have challenged this assumption and suggested that the laws of physics may change over time and space.

Evidence for Changing Laws of Physics

John Webb of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, led a study that found evidence contrary to Einstein's equivalence principle. Webb and his team analysed light from distant galaxies called quasars and found that the value of the fine structure constant, alpha, was slightly smaller 12 billion years ago than it is today on Earth. This suggests that the laws of physics may change over time and space.

Implications and Challenges

The idea that the laws of physics may change over time and space has significant implications. It suggests that our understanding of the universe and the laws that govern it may be incomplete or incorrect. However, it is challenging to prove that the laws of physics change, as it requires extremely precise measurements and observations.

Ongoing Research

Scientists continue to investigate the possibility of changing laws of physics by studying distant celestial objects and analysing data from experiments. These studies focus on measuring the fine structure constant and other fundamental constants to detect any variations that could indicate changes in the laws of physics.

Do the numerical constants that populate equations vary?

The laws of physics are believed to be universal, but there is ongoing research into whether the numerical constants that populate the equations might vary.

Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll points out that the question of whether the laws of physics are mutable is actually two separate questions: firstly, do the equations of quantum mechanics and gravity change over time and space? And secondly, do the numerical constants that populate those equations vary?

The question of whether numerical constants vary is easier to answer because physicists can make solid, testable predictions about how variations in numerical constants should affect the results of their experiments. For example, the mass of an electron was zero until the Higgs field turned on a tiny sliver of a second after the Big Bang.

One way to look for changes in the constants over time is by using atomic clocks, which can search for tiny changes in the fine structure constant. The fine structure constant is a special number that bundles a handful of other constants (the speed of light, the charge on an electron, the electric constant, and Planck's constant) into a single number, about 1/137. This is a "dimensionless" constant, meaning that it's just a number without any units. By looking at the spectrum of light from distant quasars, astrophysicists can search for changes to the fine structure constant over billions of years.

Despite some tantalizing hints, the latest studies show that changes to the fine structure constant are "consistent with zero". In other words, if the fine structure constant is changing, it's doing so in a way that is too subtle for current experiments to detect.

Another constant that physicists are looking at is G, the gravitational constant, which determines the strength of gravity. While lab experiments on Earth have returned confusing results, studies off Earth suggest that G isn't changing much, if at all. For example, radio astronomers have scoured timing data from a bright, stable pulsar to look for changes in its regular "heartbeat" of radio emission that could be caused by changes in the gravitational constant, but they found no changes.

Can the laws of physics change from one region of space to another?

The laws of physics are believed to be universal and consistent across time and space. This means that the laws of physics on Earth should be the same as those on other planets. However, there is ongoing research into whether the laws of physics could change in different regions of space or whether they have changed over time.

According to Einstein's equivalence principle, the laws of physics are the same everywhere. This principle has been supported by observations of distant galaxies and quasars, which indicate that the laws of physics have not changed over billions of years. For example, the characteristics of natural nuclear reactors in Gabon, which spontaneously ignited and sustained nuclear reactions for hundreds of thousands of years, provide evidence that the rules of nature have not changed significantly since that time.

However, there is some controversial evidence to suggest that one of the constants of nature, the fine structure constant, may be different in different parts of the cosmos. This constant determines the strength of interactions between light and matter. Observations from telescopes in Hawaii and Chile suggest that the value of this constant may be slightly different in other regions of the universe, creating a "preferred direction" or axis. This idea contradicts Einstein's special theory of relativity, which dismissed the concept of a preferred direction over 100 years ago.

While the interpretation of this data is still debated and requires further evidence, it raises the possibility that the laws of physics may not be exactly the same in all regions of space. However, any potential differences are expected to be very subtle, as our astronomical observations show that the laws of physics hold up pretty well across the universe.

What if the laws of a sub-theory of quantum mechanics were fluid?

The laws of physics are believed to be the same everywhere in the universe. However, there is ongoing research to verify if there are slight differences in distant parts of the universe.

Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory that describes the behaviour of nature at and below the scale of atoms. It is the foundation of all quantum physics, including quantum chemistry, quantum field theory, quantum technology, and quantum information science.

Now, let's explore the implications of a fluid sub-theory of quantum mechanics.

The Nature of a Fluid Sub-Theory

If a sub-theory of quantum mechanics were fluid, it would imply that the laws governing that aspect of quantum behaviour are not rigidly defined but rather exhibit some degree of flexibility or variability. This flexibility could be influenced by various factors, such as the specific conditions or context in which the phenomena occur.

Implications for Predictability and Probability

One of the key features of quantum mechanics is its inherent unpredictability. It provides probabilities for the outcomes of measurements rather than definite predictions. A fluid sub-theory could enhance or constrain this probabilistic nature. For example, certain phenomena may become more or less predictable depending on the specific conditions under which they occur.

Impact on Wave-Particle Duality

Wave-particle duality is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics, where entities can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties. A fluid sub-theory could influence how this duality manifests. For instance, the balance between wave-like and particle-like behaviour may shift depending on the context or the energy levels involved.

Effects on Quantum Interference and Superposition

Quantum interference and superposition are phenomena where the behaviour of particles is influenced by the act of observation or the presence of other particles. A fluid sub-theory could introduce additional variables that affect the interference patterns or the rules governing superposition. The complex interplay between different factors may give rise to new types of interference effects or constraints on superposition.

Consequences for Quantum Entanglement

Quantum entanglement occurs when two or more particles become intertwined, such that the behaviour of one particle is influenced by the other(s), even at a distance. A fluid sub-theory could impact the conditions under which entanglement occurs, the duration of entanglement, or the types of particles that can become entangled. It may also affect the potential for using entanglement in quantum computing and communication.

Reconciliation with Relativity

Considering spacetime as a superfluid has been proposed as a way to reconcile quantum mechanics with relativity. This idea suggests that spacetime is not fundamental but emerges from smaller constituents and their underlying physics. While this concept is not widely accepted, it offers an intriguing possibility for resolving conflicts between general relativity and quantum mechanics, particularly in extreme situations like black holes.

In conclusion, while the laws of a sub-theory of quantum mechanics being fluid would introduce an element of variability, it is challenging to speculate on specific consequences without further details about which sub-theory is involved and the nature of its fluidity. Nonetheless, it opens up intriguing possibilities for a deeper understanding of the quantum world and its interplay with our macroscopic reality.

How would different laws of physics affect potential alien life?

It is generally believed that the laws of physics are the same everywhere in the universe. As far as we know, the cosmos has been playing by the same rulebook since the Big Bang. However, there is ongoing research into whether the laws of physics might be different in some distant corner of the cosmos or whether they might have changed over time.

If the laws of physics were different on another planet, it would have a profound impact on any potential alien life there. For example, if the laws of physics on a planet allowed for different chemical elements to exist, this could enable entirely new forms of biochemistry and alien life. Alternatively, if the laws of physics on a planet caused certain elements to be absent, this could prevent certain forms of life from evolving.

The specific impact on alien life would depend on which laws of physics were different and how they differed. For example, if the law of gravity were different, it could affect the planet's orbit, climate, and the evolution of flight in species. If the laws of physics governing electromagnetism were different, it could affect the planet's magnetic field, the chemistry of the atmosphere, and the functioning of any technological species.

While we have no evidence that the laws of physics are different on other planets, it is a fascinating topic for speculation and science fiction. The possibility of different laws of physics on other planets highlights our limited understanding of the universe and the potential for new discoveries.

Frequently asked questions