Traditional Laws: Application And Modern Agreement Challenges

how have traditional laws been applied to these agreements

The advent of the internet age has raised questions about the validity of online contracts and how traditional laws apply to them. In the past, contracts were drafted, negotiated, and executed in physical form, but now, many contracts are created, negotiated, and signed electronically. In 2000, the United States federal government passed the Electronic Signatures in Global and International Commerce Act (ESGICA), which gave electronic contracts and signatures the same legal weight as traditional paper contracts and signatures. This was further supported by the federal Electronic Signatures Act (ESIGN) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), which established that electronic signatures are a valid and enforceable form of signing a contract.

Despite the shift to digital, traditional laws regarding contracts still apply. For instance, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which requires that contracts for the sale of goods over $500 be in writing, is still relevant. Additionally, contracts must have essential elements such as a lawful purpose, a meeting of the minds, consideration, and legally competent parties to be considered legally binding.

While the internet has brought about new challenges and considerations, traditional laws have been adapted and applied to online agreements to ensure their validity and enforceability.

Characteristics Values
Nature of the contract A smart contract is a computer program or a transaction protocol that is intended to automatically execute, control or document events and actions according to the terms of a contract or an agreement.
Legality A smart contract is not typically a valid binding agreement at law. However, it can be a legally binding agreement depending on several factors.
Applicability A smart contract can be applied to any kind of computer program that uses a blockchain.
Security Byzantine fault-tolerant algorithms secure the smart contract in a decentralised way from attempts to tamper with it.
Immutability Once a smart contract is deployed, it cannot be updated.
Interoperability Most smart contracts run on the Ethereum blockchain or one of its derivative chains.
Functionality Smart contracts can be used in a wide variety of decentralised digital transactions, including NFT sales, DAOs, and dApps.
Flexibility Smart contracts are considerably more difficult to modify than traditional contracts.

lawshun

International law and treaties

Under international law, a "treaty" refers to binding international agreements between states or international organisations. "International agreements" encompass both binding and non-binding agreements. The term "executive agreement" is a creation of US domestic law, and executive agreements that are binding are considered treaties in international law. The 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States are key sources for defining treaties under international law.

Customary international law recognises oral agreements as equally binding as written ones. The content of an agreement, rather than its form, determines whether it expresses customary law. The International Court of Justice has noted that provisions in such agreements may be binding on a state as customary law, even if the state is not a party to the agreement.

The modern system of international human rights was developed after World War II to hold states accountable for human rights violations. The UN established the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which set non-binding human rights standards. Subsequently, the UN adopted two human rights treaties: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).

There have been attempts to standardise international law to prevent inconsistencies arising from differences in national laws. Treaties like the Hague Convention and the Brussels Regulations codified practices on the enforcement of international judgments. These treaties state that a foreign judgment will be automatically recognised and enforced where required in the jurisdiction of a party's residence, unless it contradicts public order or conflicts with a local judgment involving the same parties.

lawshun

Customary law

Customary international law refers to international obligations arising from established or usual international practices. It is an aspect of international law that involves the principle of custom and is considered by the International Court of Justice, jurists, the United Nations, and its member states to be among the primary sources of international law. Customary international law can be distinguished from treaty law, which consists of explicit agreements between nations to assume obligations.

lawshun

Political agreements

In the United States, the President has the power to make and modify many political agreements without the approval of the Senate or Congress. These agreements are based on the sole authority of the President and are within their rights to amend, so long as the agreement carries out the underlying treaty or law's purpose.

The term "executive agreement" is a feature of US domestic law, not international law. An "executive agreement" that is a binding international agreement is considered a "treaty" in international law terminology. The increase in international agreements has seen a rise in executive agreements, comprising more than 90% of international agreements concluded since 1939.

The traditional distinction between treaties and executive agreements has broken down, with the former being the appropriate means of making significant political commitments, and the latter being the appropriate instrument for routine, non-political arrangements. Treaties were traditionally established by custom and practice, resulting in a lack of precise definition.

The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties contains rules governing treaty relationships that are recognized as general principles of international law. It also outlines the rare and exceptional circumstances in which a state can invalidate a treaty, such as a manifest violation of a state's internal law regarding competence to conclude treaties.

lawshun

Treaty interpretation

The interpretation of treaties, or international agreements, is a complex task that involves applying traditional legal principles while also considering the unique characteristics of international law. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) serves as the primary framework for treaty interpretation, providing a set of rules that guide the process.

One key principle in treaty interpretation is that the ordinary meaning of treaty terms should be given precedence. This means that the interpretation should start with the plain and common understanding of the words used in the treaty, taking into account their context and any special meanings they may have in international law or other relevant fields. This approach ensures that the interpretation remains objective and consistent, preventing the selective or biased interpretation of treaty provisions.

In addition to the textual approach, the VCLT also allows for the consideration of supplementary means of interpretation. These include the preparatory work of the treaty, known as the travaux préparatoires, which can provide valuable insights into the intentions of the drafters and the understanding of the treaty provisions by the negotiating parties. However, the use of preparatory work in interpretation has been a subject of debate, with some scholars arguing for a more restrictive approach to ensure the stability and predictability of treaty obligations.

Another important aspect of treaty interpretation is the role of subsequent practice and agreements. According to Article 31(3)(b) of the VCLT, subsequent agreements or practices can be taken into account when interpreting the treaty, as they reflect the common understanding of the parties regarding its interpretation. This allows for a dynamic and evolving interpretation of treaty provisions, ensuring that they remain relevant and adaptable to changing circumstances.

Furthermore, the interpretation of treaties should also consider the object and purpose of the treaty as a whole. This involves examining the treaty in its entirety, taking into account its context, structure, and purpose, to ensure that the interpretation of specific provisions is consistent with the overall objectives of the treaty. This holistic approach helps to avoid interpretations that may render certain provisions meaningless or contradictory.

In applying these principles, it is important to note that treaty interpretation is not a mechanical process but rather an exercise in determining the common understanding of the parties. This means that the interpretation should be reasonable and practical, taking into account the context and purpose of the treaty, as well as the interests and intentions of the parties involved. This approach ensures that treaties are interpreted in a manner that is consistent, predictable, and reflective of the international community's shared understanding of the relevant norms and obligations.

lawshun

Treaty approval

The term "treaty" is applied to all binding international agreements between states or between states and international organisations. The term "international agreement" includes both binding and non-binding agreements. The former are considered treaties in international law, while the latter, also known as political agreements, are not enforceable in courts and are not considered treaties.

In the United States, the Constitution makes treaties the supreme law of the land and divides the treaty-making power between the President and the Senate. The President has the power to propose treaties, and the Senate can approve or disapprove of the terms. The Senate's role has evolved into a more formal pattern of passing judgment on completed treaties, approving or not approving them, or approving them with conditions that the President must accept if he ratifies them. This dynamic between the President and the Senate is unique to the United States and makes treaties particularly important and challenging.

The rules of international law on treaty interpretation are specified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which sets general principles of international law recognised by the US and the international community. However, the Vienna Convention differs in some respects from the rules of treaty interpretation applied by US courts when determining a treaty's effect as domestic law. The US has not ratified the Vienna Convention, but it still influences Senate advice and consent on future treaties.

Additionally, the extent of congressional obligation to implement a treaty under US law remains unresolved. While Congress has generally responded to a sense of duty and the need to maintain the dependability of the US system, it has also interpreted and shaped the implementation details, sometimes not giving the President the exact laws or funds requested.

Frequently asked questions

A smart contract is a self-executing computer program or transaction protocol that automatically executes, controls, or documents events and actions according to the terms of a contract or agreement. It is usually defined as a piece of computer code that exists on a blockchain.

Smart contracts are not necessarily legally enforceable as traditional contracts. However, they can be legally binding agreements if they meet the core definition of a contract: a meeting of the minds with an exchange of consideration.

Smart contracts pose legal, business, and ethical concerns that do not apply to standard paper contracts. For example, they leave no room for ongoing negotiations or interpretation, and any mistake or accidental vulnerability in the code would have to be regarded as part of the contract.

Smart contracts are being widely recognised in jurisdictions such as the US and Europe. In the US, states like Arizona, Iowa, Nevada, Tennessee, and Wyoming have passed legislation on the use of smart contracts. In Europe, smart contracts are recognised under the EU's electronic signature law (eIDAS).

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment