Fleeing Felon Law: Trayvon Martin's Case And Its Relevance

The Fleeing Felon Rule is a common-law principle that permits law enforcement officers to use force, including deadly force, against individuals suspected of a felony who are attempting to escape arrest. The rule was established to prevent felons from evading justice and to protect public safety. In the United States, the application of this rule has been a subject of debate and was significantly limited by the Tennessee v. Garner case in 1985, which held that deadly force may only be used when necessary to prevent escape and when the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat. With ongoing discussions around police accountability and reform, the Fleeing Felon Rule has come under scrutiny, especially in cases like that of Trayvon Martin, where the use of deadly force has resulted in tragic outcomes.

Was Trayvon Martin a felon??

Trayvon Benjamin Martin was a 17-year-old African-American male from Miami Gardens, Florida. On February 26, 2012, Martin was fatally shot in Sanford, Florida, by 28-year-old Hispanic-American George Zimmerman, a member of the community watch.

On the evening of his death, Martin was walking back to his father's fiancée's house from a nearby convenience store. Zimmerman, who was on the neighbourhood watch, saw Martin and reported him to the Sanford Police as suspicious. An altercation ensued, and Zimmerman fatally shot Martin in the chest.

Zimmerman claimed self-defence and was not charged initially. The police said there was no evidence to refute his claim of self-defence, and Florida's stand-your-ground law prohibited them from arresting or charging him. However, after national media attention, Zimmerman was eventually charged and tried for second-degree murder and manslaughter. A jury acquitted him of all charges in July 2013.

At the time of his death, Martin was serving a ten-day suspension from Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School for having a marijuana pipe and an empty bag containing marijuana residue. He had also been suspended twice before, for tardiness and truancy, and for marking up a door with graffiti. Despite these suspensions, Martin was not charged with any crime and did not have a juvenile record.

In summary, while Martin had been suspended from school for behavioural issues, there is no indication that he was a convicted felon. The fleeing felon rule, which permits the use of force, including deadly force, against an individual suspected of a felony and attempting to escape arrest, would not appear to apply in this case.

Was Trayvon Martin fleeing?

On the evening of February 26, 2012, 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was visiting his father in Sanford, Florida. At the same time, George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old neighbourhood watch coordinator, was driving through the neighbourhood. Zimmerman became suspicious of Martin, called the police, and began following him. The police dispatcher asked if Zimmerman was following Martin, to which Zimmerman replied, "yeah". The dispatcher then said, "We don't need you to do that", and Zimmerman responded, "Okay".

Moments later, neighbours reported hearing gunfire. Zimmerman acknowledged that he had shot Martin, claiming it was in self-defence. In a police report, Officer Timothy Smith wrote that Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and back of the head.

So, was Trayvon Martin fleeing? The answer is yes. Martin was walking back from a convenience store when Zimmerman noticed him and called the police. Despite being instructed not to, Zimmerman continued to follow Martin. Martin then ran, and Zimmerman pursued him.

Did the fleeing felon rule apply to Trayvon Martin's case?

The "fleeing felon rule" is a legal concept that gives law enforcement officers the authority to use reasonable force, including deadly force if necessary, to apprehend or prevent the escape of a fleeing felon. This rule, rooted in common law, was initially established to prevent felons from evading justice and to protect public safety. However, the application of this rule has been a subject of debate, with critics arguing that it can lead to abuses of power, racial profiling, and the infringement of civil rights.

In the case of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old African-American boy fatally shot by 28-year-old George Zimmerman, a community watch member, in Sanford, Florida, on February 26, 2012, the fleeing felon rule was not directly applicable. Trayvon Martin was walking back to his father's fiancée's house from a convenience store when Zimmerman reported him to the police as suspicious. An altercation ensued, and Zimmerman fatally shot Martin in the chest, claiming self-defense.

At the time, Florida's stand-your-ground law prohibited the police from arresting or charging Zimmerman, and he was not charged immediately after the incident. However, following national media attention and protests, Zimmerman was eventually charged and tried for second-degree murder and manslaughter. The fleeing felon rule, as a separate concept, was not directly invoked in this case.

It is important to note that the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers has been scrutinized over the years, with the landmark case of Tennessee v. Garner in 1985 placing restrictions on its use against fleeing felons. In that case, the United States Supreme Court held that the use of deadly force to apprehend a fleeing suspect who did not pose an immediate threat was unconstitutional and a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

What is the fleeing felon rule?

The "fleeing felon" rule is a legal concept that provides law enforcement officers with the authority to apprehend individuals who are suspected or convicted of a felony offense and are actively evading arrest. It is based on common law, which initially allowed the use of deadly force by police to prevent the escape of a fleeing felon, even if the individual did not pose an imminent threat.

In the United States, the Supreme Court case of Tennessee v. Garner in 1985 placed restrictions on the use of deadly force against fleeing felons. The Court held that the use of deadly force is subject to the reasonableness requirement of the Fourth Amendment and that it can only be justified when a suspect poses a substantial risk of serious physical harm. This decision emphasized the need for a reasonable belief that the suspect poses a significant threat, and it limited the use of deadly force to situations where it is necessary to prevent the escape and protect public safety.

The fleeing felon rule has been the subject of ongoing debates and legal discussions. Supporters argue that it ensures the swift apprehension of dangerous individuals, while critics raise concerns about potential abuses of power, racial profiling, and the infringement of civil rights. There have been calls for reforms to balance law enforcement needs with individual rights, and some jurisdictions have adopted stricter limitations on the use of force.

The application of the fleeing felon rule varies across jurisdictions, with different factors influencing law enforcement's response, such as the severity of the crime, the level of threat to public safety, and the availability of alternative means for apprehension. It is important to note that the use of force must be proportionate to the threat posed, and law enforcement officers are expected to exercise sound judgment in these situations.

What was the outcome of Trayvon Martin's case?

On February 26, 2012, 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was shot and killed by 28-year-old George Zimmerman, a neighbourhood watch volunteer and insurance fraud investigator, in Sanford, Florida. Martin was unarmed and walking home from a convenience store, carrying a bag of Skittles and a bottle of juice. He was staying with his father in Sanford and was dressed in a hooded sweatshirt.

Zimmerman, who was patrolling the Retreat at Twin Lakes townhouse community, called the Sanford police non-emergency line to report that Martin looked "suspicious". He was instructed not to follow the teenager but disregarded this advice. Moments later, neighbours heard gunfire. When officers arrived, Martin was dead at the scene. Zimmerman, who had a bloody nose and cuts on the back of his head, claimed he had acted in self-defence and was questioned and released. There were no eyewitnesses to the shooting.

Martin's parents raised concerns about the police investigation, and the case gained national attention. Protests and rallies were held across the United States, with many believing that Zimmerman had racially profiled Martin as suspicious and threatening. On March 23, 2012, President Barack Obama commented on the shooting, saying: "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon".

On April 11, 2012, following weeks of demonstrations, a special prosecutor appointed by Florida's governor charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder. He pleaded not guilty, and the case went to trial in June 2013. The prosecution portrayed Zimmerman as a "wannabe cop" who had profiled Martin as a criminal and chased him down. They pointed to inconsistencies in his statements to the police. Zimmerman's defence attorneys argued that he shot Martin only after the teenager attacked him.

On July 13, 2013, after more than 16 hours of deliberation, a jury of six women found Zimmerman not guilty of second-degree murder and the lesser charge of manslaughter.

Frequently asked questions