Atoms: Breaking Physics Laws, Unlocking The Unknown

The concept of atoms breaking the laws of physics is intriguing, and it challenges our understanding of the universe. Scientists have long assumed that absolute physical laws govern the cosmos, but new discoveries and phenomena, such as the behaviour of muons, often raise questions and suggest that these laws may not be as fixed as we once thought. This idea of breaking the laws of physics is a fascinating aspect of scientific exploration, as it pushes us to develop new theories and improve our understanding of the natural world. While some laws, like the conservation of momentum, are deeply entrenched, others are more flexible and open to revision as new evidence emerges. This constant evolution of knowledge is what makes physics so captivating, as we are always learning and refining our understanding of the universe.

Muons: heavy, unstable versions of electrons

The existence of muons, heavy and unstable versions of electrons, has been regarded as a possible break in the laws of physics. The discovery of muons was met with surprise by physicists, including Nobel laureate Isidor Isaac Rabi, who played a role in developing the atom bomb for the US. Muons seemed superfluous to the requirements of nature from the perspective of an orderly physicist.

Muons are, for all intents and purposes, heavy and unstable versions of electrons. They are an example of particles that do not seem to follow the laws of physics. The laws of physics are often referred to as the absolute physical laws that govern the behaviour of the cosmos. However, it is important to distinguish between the scientific theories developed through experimentation and observation and the potential absolute set of physical laws that may exist.

When new phenomena are discovered that appear to break the laws of physics, it indicates that there is an opportunity to learn something new about the universe. This process involves updating our understanding of physics and modifying our existing theories. For example, while Newton's law of universal gravitation was a major step forward in our understanding of gravity and the wider universe, it was later found to have shortcomings, such as its inability to fully explain the orbit of Mercury.

In the case of muons, their existence as heavy and unstable versions of electrons challenges our current understanding of particles and their adherence to the laws of physics. This discovery highlights the provisional nature of scientific knowledge and the importance of continuing to seek out new discoveries and refine our theories. The existence of muons and their unique properties provide valuable insights into the complexities of the natural world and the ongoing pursuit of a more sophisticated understanding of physics.

The laws of conservation of momentum

Momentum is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction, which makes it more challenging to work with than mass and energy. In any given system, the total momentum remains the same, even if transferred between objects. For example, during a rocket launch, the downward momentum of the exhaust gases equals the upward momentum of the rocket, keeping the total momentum at zero.

The law of conservation of momentum has been abundantly confirmed through experiments and can be mathematically deduced. It is a foundational principle in physics, underpinning theories of basic mechanics, gravitation, relativity, fluid mechanics, and electromagnetism. Despite its centrality, it is still a provisional theory, like all laws in physics, meaning it can be modified or even broken if new evidence is discovered.

The concept of breaking the laws of physics is intriguing. Scientists assume that absolute physical laws govern the universe, but the term "laws of physics" also refers to the scientific theories we've developed through experimentation and observation. These two concepts are distinct, and new discoveries can break the latter understanding of the laws of physics, requiring us to modify our theories.

While we may never be certain that absolute physical laws exist, the law of conservation of momentum has never been violated in centuries of study and it forms the basis for many other theories in physics.

Newton's law of gravity

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is proportional to the masses of those objects and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This can be expressed by the equation:

F = G(m1 x m2) / r^2

Where:

• F is the force of gravity between two objects
• G is the gravitational constant
• M1 and m2 are the masses of the objects
• R is the distance between the centres of their masses

Newton's law was a major step forward in our understanding of gravity and the wider universe. It unified the previously described phenomena of gravity on Earth with known astronomical behaviours. However, it is considered incomplete as it cannot fully describe the orbit of Mercury, for example. In such cases, Einstein's theory of general relativity is used to provide a more accurate description of gravity.

The bedrock of sprawling, complex theories of the cosmos

The laws of physics are often thought of as absolute, unbreakable rules that govern the behaviour of the cosmos. However, this notion is being challenged constantly as new discoveries and phenomena are made. Many laws of physics have been broken over the centuries, and some are even being broken right now. This idea of breaking the laws of physics occurs when new discoveries or phenomena contradict or deviate from our established scientific theories.

The term "law" in physics is loosely defined and can refer to a few different concepts. Sometimes, it describes properties of the natural world that have been consistently observed over a long period. In other cases, it is attached to fundamental ideas that form the bedrock of sprawling, complex theories of the cosmos. These theories aim to explain the intricate workings of the universe, from the behaviour of subatomic particles to the vast expanses of space.

One example of a broken law of physics is Bode's Law, proposed in 1715. It stated that each planet should be roughly twice as far away from the Sun as the next planet inwards. While this law worked for Ceres and the prediction of the asteroid belt, it failed after the discovery of Neptune. Another instance is Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, which revolutionised our understanding of gravity and the wider universe. However, it faced shortcomings when it could not completely describe the orbit of Mercury, leading to the development of Einstein's theory of general relativity.

The concept of breaking the laws of physics highlights the provisional nature of scientific knowledge. It is based on the evidence available, and as new evidence emerges, our understanding of physics evolves. This process of discovery and revision allows us to progress in our knowledge and develop a more sophisticated understanding of the natural world. It is important to note that while some laws of physics are broken, there are deeply studied and fundamental principles, such as the conservation of momentum, that have never been violated and form the foundation of various theories in physics.

Metaphysical assumptions about the universe

Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that deals with the fundamental nature of reality, including the study of mind-independent features of the world. It is concerned with the basic structure of reality and the nature of existence, space, time, and change, as well as their connection to causality and the laws of nature.

One example of a metaphysical assumption is the concept of "spacetime", which posits that space and time are not separate entities but are fundamentally interconnected and interdependent. Another assumption is the idea of "fields", such as gravitational or electromagnetic fields, which are used to explain the interactions between particles and objects in the universe.

In physics, the Equivalence Principle serves as a classic example of a metaphysical assumption. It states that the force of gravitation is equal to the force of inertia, even though only the latter can be directly measured. This assumption allows scientists to explain gravitational phenomena and make predictions, even though the force of gravity itself remains elusive.

While metaphysical assumptions are essential for scientific progress, they are also open to revision and refinement as new evidence and theories emerge. The very nature of metaphysics is a subject of debate, with some viewing it as a unified field and others seeing it as a collection of diverse topics. Ultimately, the assumptions and theories that underpin our understanding of the universe are always subject to further exploration and discovery.

Frequently asked questions