James Charles: A Lawbreaker's Story

James Charles is a YouTube makeup artist and vlogger who has faced a lot of controversy over the years. Charles has been accused of sexual misconduct by more than 15 men and boys, including soliciting nude photos from minors and sexually harassing men through social media apps. While Charles has denied some of the allegations, he has also released a video titled holding myself accountable, in which he apologises for his actions and takes full responsibility. Despite this, Charles' channel was temporarily demonetised by YouTube, and he has lost partnerships with several brands.

Sexting underage boys

In April 2021, YouTuber James Charles was accused of sexting underage boys and grooming. The 21-year-old beauty influencer, who has over 25 million subscribers on his YouTube channel, admitted to sending sexually explicit messages to two 16-year-old boys. In a video posted to his channel, titled "Holding Myself Accountable", Charles said:

> I fully understand my actions and how they are wrong. [...] These conversations should have never happened.

He also apologised to the boys and said he would be taking time away from social media to "educate" himself about these issues.

The allegations against Charles first emerged on social media earlier in 2021. In February, one teenager accused him of grooming, which Charles denied, saying he believed the boy to be 18. However, in his "Holding Myself Accountable" video, Charles admitted that there were two incidents where he became aware that the person he was exchanging messages with was underage. He said he could have searched for them on other social media platforms to discover their real ages.

Following the allegations, YouTube restricted Charles's ability to monetise his content, and he was dropped from his role as host of the digital reality competition series "Instant Influencer".

Grooming

James Charles, the YouTube makeup artist and vlogger, has been accused of sexual misconduct by more than 15 men and boys, including soliciting nude photos from minors and sexually harassing men through conversations on social media apps. Charles initially denied the allegations, but later acknowledged the conversations with at least two minors in a YouTube video titled "holding myself accountable." In this video, he apologised for his actions and admitted to being reckless in his pursuit of romantic or sexual relationships with fans.

In February 2021, a 16-year-old boy accused Charles of grooming and sending him unsolicited nude photos via Snapchat. The accuser shared censored screenshots of the photos and claimed that Charles continued to pressure him to reciprocate even after learning of his age. Charles denied the allegations, stating that the boy had lied about being 18 and that he had been excited about meeting someone "potentially great." However, the boy's school documentation confirmed his age, and he also stated that his age was publicly available in his Instagram bio at the time.

Since then, at least four more teenage boys have come forward with similar allegations of grooming against Charles. One 17-year-old claimed that Charles continued to flirt with him after learning he was underage, while a 15-year-old boy alleged that Charles messaged him repeatedly despite knowing his age. Charles responded to these accusations in a video, taking "full responsibility" for his actions and apologising. He admitted that there was a power imbalance between himself and his fans, and that he would take a break from social media to "reflect and further educate" himself.

The legal implications of these allegations are serious. Emily D. Baker, a lawyer-turned-YouTuber, stated that for law enforcement to get involved, an accuser would likely need to work with local police to initiate an investigation. This could lead to obtaining search warrants for evidence from social media companies and potentially pursuing criminal charges or civil litigation against Charles.

Defamation

In terms of defamation, the key question is whether the accusations against Charles are true or false. If they are true, then they do not constitute defamation, as the statements would not be false. However, if the accusations are false, then Charles could potentially pursue legal action for defamation.

In the United States, where Charles is based, defamation law varies by state, but generally, there are two types of defamation: libel and slander. Libel refers to written or printed false statements, while slander refers to spoken false statements. To prove defamation, Charles would need to demonstrate that the statements made against him were false, published or communicated to a third party, caused damage to his reputation, and were made with some level of fault, such as negligence or malice.

It is important to note that public figures like Charles face a higher burden of proof in defamation cases. They must demonstrate that the person making the statement acted with "actual malice," meaning they knew the statement was false or showed reckless disregard for the truth. This higher standard is in place to protect free speech and ensure that public figures cannot easily suppress criticism or negative statements.

In the case of Charles, the accusations of sexual misconduct and sexting minors were made on social media platforms like TikTok and Twitter, which would likely fall under libel laws. Charles could potentially argue that the statements were false and caused damage to his reputation, as he lost brand partnerships and YouTube subscribers following the allegations. However, proving that the accusers acted with actual malice could be challenging, especially if they believed their statements to be true.

Additionally, in some states, there are anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) laws in place to protect individuals from meritless defamation lawsuits designed to intimidate or silence them. These laws allow defendants to file a motion to dismiss the defamation case early in the legal process and seek legal fees if the lawsuit is deemed to infringe on their First Amendment rights.

Overall, while the accusations against James Charles may have defamatory content, the complexities of defamation law, particularly regarding public figures, make it challenging to pursue legal action.

Sexual harassment

In April 2021, YouTuber James Charles released a video titled "holding myself accountable" in which he addressed accusations of sexual misconduct involving minors. Charles acknowledged conversations with at least two boys who were 16 at the time, apologised for his actions, and said he would be taking a break from social media to "reflect and further educate" himself.

In the video, Charles said that he had been reckless by talking to his fans in pursuit of a romantic or sexual relationship. He also said that he had asked the boys their age on Snapchat and was told they were 18. When he later found out they were 16, he said he felt "embarrassed" and immediately blocked them.

One of the boys, Isaiyah, disputed Charles' version of events, saying that his age was publicly available in his Instagram bio at the time they were messaging each other.

Since May 2019, more than 15 men and boys have accused Charles of sexual misconduct, including soliciting nude photos from minors and sexually harassing men in person and online. Many of the allegations surfaced in TikTok videos, and it is unclear whether any of them have been independently corroborated.

In a statement, Charles said: "I owe a massive apology to anybody that I've hurt or anybody that I made uncomfortable with my actions."

Criminal behaviour

James Charles has been accused of sexual misconduct by more than 15 men and boys, including soliciting nude photos from minors and sexually harassing men through conversations on apps like Snapchat and Instagram. Many of these allegations have surfaced through TikTok videos, and while they have not been independently corroborated, Charles has acknowledged the authenticity of screenshots of conversations with at least two 16-year-old boys.

In one instance, Charles claimed that a 16-year-old accuser named Isaiyah and another unnamed 16-year-old lied about their ages, stating that they were 18. However, Isaiyah countered that his age was publicly available in his Instagram bio at the time, and this has been confirmed by school documentation.

The accusations against Charles have raised questions about the potential involvement of law enforcement. According to legal expert and former deputy district attorney Emily D. Baker, it is unlikely that any law enforcement agency would initiate an investigation without an accuser coming forward to their local agency. Accusers would likely need to work with local police to begin an investigation, and a police report would be required.

Baker further explained that law enforcement would need a reasonable basis and a search warrant to obtain evidence from social media companies. Warrants could also reveal the locations from which images and messages were sent. While social media companies cannot provide such evidence without a court warrant, the process of obtaining one and receiving authenticated evidence could take months.

In response to the allegations, Charles has released a video titled "holding myself accountable," in which he admits to being reckless in his interactions with fans on social media. He has also stated that he plans to ask for ID from "every guy I have a conversation with" to verify their age. Despite these statements, Charles continues to face scrutiny for his inappropriate behaviour and alleged misuse of his power dynamic with young fans.

Frequently asked questions