Georgia's Abortion Law: Damaging Impacts On Women's Health And Rights

Georgia's abortion law, which prohibits abortions beyond six weeks of pregnancy, has been a source of controversy and has been challenged in courts. The law, known as the LIFE Act, was passed in 2019 and went into effect in 2022 after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The law has been criticized for not allowing enough time for women to terminate their pregnancies, as many are unaware they are pregnant during the first six weeks. The law has faced legal challenges, with a Georgia judge ruling in September 2024 that it violates the state's constitution and the right to privacy. However, the Georgia Supreme Court has temporarily halted this ruling as the state appeals the decision. The abortion law in Georgia has had significant impacts, with a decrease in the number of abortions performed in the state and thousands of women travelling from out of state to seek abortions. The law has also been linked to the deaths of two women, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, who were unable to access safe and legal abortions.

The law prevents women from making personal healthcare decisions

Georgia's abortion law, known as the Life Act or the "heartbeat law", prohibits most abortions once a physician can detect cardiac activity in the fetus, which is usually around six weeks into a pregnancy. This law effectively prevents women from making personal healthcare decisions about their bodies and their pregnancies.

The law was passed by the Republican-dominated state legislature and signed by Governor Brian Kemp in 2019. However, it was initially blocked from taking effect until the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, which had protected the right to abortion for nearly 50 years. The Georgia law came into force on July 20, 2022, and abortion providers and advocates in the state expressed concern that it would soon be overturned.

The six-week ban on abortions leaves little time for women to terminate a pregnancy, as many women do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks. This law infringes on a woman's right to liberty and privacy, as it interferes with her healthcare choices and prevents her from making decisions about her own body.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney ruled on September 30, 2024, that the abortion law is unconstitutional and violates the right to privacy in the Georgia Constitution, which includes the right to make personal healthcare decisions. He wrote that "liberty in Georgia includes in its meaning, in its protections, and in its bundle of rights the power of a woman to control her own body, to decide what happens to it and in it, and to reject state interference with her healthcare choices."

The judge's decision rolled back the abortion limits in Georgia to a prior law allowing abortions until viability, which is typically between 22 and 24 weeks into a pregnancy. This ruling was welcomed by abortion rights supporters, who had protested the six-week ban and highlighted the preventable deaths of two Georgia women, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, due to a lack of access to legal abortions.

It disproportionately affects poor women and women of colour

Georgia's abortion law disproportionately affects poor women and women of colour. The law prohibits abortions once a "detectable human heartbeat" is present, which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. Many women do not know they are pregnant at this stage, and the short time frame makes it difficult for them to take action to terminate the pregnancy. This is especially true for women with fewer resources, who may struggle to access healthcare services and travel to other states for abortions.

The law has been criticised for its lack of exceptions for cases of rape or incest, and the mandatory waiting periods and counselling requirements further burden women seeking abortions. The financial costs of these additional requirements disproportionately affect poor women, who may already be struggling to access healthcare due to a lack of insurance or other financial barriers.

Furthermore, the law's focus on protecting the "unborn child" and "unborn life" has been criticised for prioritising the rights of the fetus over those of the pregnant woman. This has serious implications for women of colour, who already face systemic racism and discrimination in healthcare. The law effectively requires women of colour to engage in "compulsory labour", carrying a pregnancy to term against their will, which is a form of involuntary servitude.

The impact of the abortion law in Georgia has been devastating for poor women and women of colour, with reports of preventable deaths and complications due to delayed or denied care. The law's restrictions have resulted in women seeking unsafe alternatives, such as self-managed abortions and abortion pills, which can have serious health consequences. The maternal mortality rate in Georgia has risen, and the law has been linked to several preventable deaths, including those of Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, who were unable to access safe and legal abortions.

The abortion law in Georgia has far-reaching consequences for poor women and women of colour, limiting their reproductive rights, endangering their health and well-being, and perpetuating systemic inequalities.

It has led to preventable deaths

The abortion law in Georgia has been linked to the preventable deaths of two women, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller. Both women died in 2022, shortly after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Thurman, a 28-year-old mother of a six-year-old son, had wanted to terminate her pregnancy but was unable to receive care in Georgia as she was past the state's six-week limit. She travelled out of state but missed her appointment and was instead prescribed medication for a chemically induced abortion. After experiencing complications, she went to the hospital but doctors delayed treatment for 20 hours, during which time her blood pressure fell and her organs began to fail. When they finally intervened, it was too late, and Thurman died.

The Georgia Maternal Mortality Review Committee reviewed Thurman's case and concluded that her death was preventable. They stated that the largest impact was the delay in receiving a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure, and that there was a good chance her life could have been saved if doctors had intervened sooner.

Miller, a 41-year-old mother of three, had several medical complications, including lupus, diabetes, and hypertension. Her doctors had warned her that another pregnancy could be life-threatening. However, due to Georgia's abortion ban, which did not account for her chronic conditions, she was unable to receive a legal abortion. Miller avoided doctors and instead ordered abortion pills online, which she took at home. The abortion was incomplete, leaving unexpelled fetal tissue in her uterus, and she subsequently died from sepsis, a painful and grave infection.

Miller's death was also deemed preventable by the Georgia Maternal Mortality Review Committee, who blamed the state's abortion ban. They concluded that Miller's decision to manage her abortion alone and her reticence to seek medical care were influenced by the legislation.

These tragic cases illustrate the devastating impact of Georgia's abortion law and the urgent need for improved access to safe and legal abortions.

It has caused women to travel out of state for abortions

Georgia's abortion law has led to women travelling out of state to access abortions. The state's six-week abortion ban, which came into force in July 2022, means that many women are forced to seek abortions elsewhere, as they often do not realise they are pregnant until after this point. This was the case for Amber Nicole Thurman, who Vice President Kamala Harris highlighted as an example of the impact of Georgia's abortion laws. Harris explained that Thurman was unable to receive care in Georgia as she was past six weeks pregnant, and so travelled to another state. However, due to the number of women travelling to this state from other states with strict abortion laws, Thurman was unable to make her appointment and ended up taking abortion pills, which led to complications.

Georgia's abortion law has also had an impact on neighbouring states, with thousands of women travelling to North Carolina and Georgia from out of state to access abortions in 2015. This influx of women seeking abortions has put a strain on services, as demonstrated by the case of Amber Nicole Thurman.

The six-week abortion ban in Georgia was ruled unconstitutional by a judge in September 2024, but it remains in effect while the state appeals the ruling. If the ruling stands, it could open new avenues for people in Georgia and nearby states to access abortions.

The impact of Georgia's abortion law on women's ability to access abortions has been felt deeply in the South, where many people live hundreds of miles from states with more lenient abortion laws. The law has also caused concern among abortion providers and advocates in Georgia, who fear that it will be overturned.

It has led to a rise in infant mortality rates

Georgia's abortion law has led to a rise in infant mortality rates. The state's abortion ban has been linked to the preventable deaths of two women, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, who were unable to access legal abortions or timely medical care. In the case of Amber, doctors waited 20 hours to provide a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure, which ultimately resulted in her death. Candi, on the other hand, avoided doctors and attempted a medication abortion on her own, which was incomplete and led to fatal complications. These cases highlight the impact of abortion restrictions on access to reproductive healthcare and the resulting increase in infant mortality rates.

The abortion law in Georgia, known as the Life Act or the "fetal heartbeat" law, prohibits abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. This leaves women with very little time to decide whether to terminate their pregnancy, as many may not even know they are pregnant at that early stage. The law provides some exceptions, including medical emergencies, pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, and medically futile pregnancies. However, physicians have stated that there is a lack of clarity and scientific basis for interpreting these exceptions, leading to confusion and delayed care.

The impact of Georgia's abortion law on infant mortality rates is evident in the cases of Amber and Candi, who faced challenges in accessing safe and timely abortions. The law's restrictions contributed to delays in receiving necessary medical procedures, such as the D&C procedure in Amber's case, which could have saved her life if performed sooner. The law's vague nature and lack of clear guidance have been criticized by physicians, who face the threat of prison time if they are perceived to have misstepped.

The rise in infant mortality rates in Georgia can be attributed to the limited access to safe and legal abortions, as well as the confusion and delays in medical care caused by the abortion law. The preventable deaths of Amber and Candi highlight the very real consequences of restrictive abortion laws on women's health and lives. The law's impact extends beyond these individual cases, as thousands of women from out of state have also sought abortions in Georgia due to tight restrictions in their neighboring states.

The link between Georgia's abortion law and the rise in infant mortality rates is undeniable, with official committees examining pregnancy-related deaths concluding that the deaths of Amber and Candi were preventable. The law's exceptions, meant to protect the lives of pregnant women, have not been effectively implemented due to their ambiguous nature. This has resulted in delayed or denied care, even in cases where women's lives are at risk. The impact of Georgia's abortion law extends beyond infant mortality rates, as it also affects the overall health and well-being of women in the state.

Frequently asked questions