Marijuana And Federal Law: Is Medical Marijuana Legal?

Marijuana is a highly controversial topic in the United States, with a complex legal landscape that differs from state to state. While public opinion and state laws are moving towards embracing the use of cannabis, the federal government has not made the same move. Marijuana is still classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act, which means it is considered to have a high potential for dependency and no recognised medical value. This classification places marijuana in the same category as drugs such as heroin and LSD. As a result, the possession, cultivation, distribution, and use of marijuana are illegal according to federal law, and individuals who use marijuana in compliance with state law may still be violating federal law. This conflict between state and federal law has created numerous challenges and complications for consumers, regulators, law enforcement, and businesses.

Doctors can't prescribe medical marijuana

Doctors cannot prescribe medical marijuana because it is a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This means that it is considered to have a high potential for abuse and no medical value. While some states have legalized medical marijuana, it is still illegal under federal law.

The CSA, enacted in 1970, classifies and regulates illegal drugs according to their medicinal value and potential for abuse. Marijuana, as a Schedule I drug, is in the same category as LSD and heroin. Doctors are prohibited from prescribing it because doing so would constitute aiding and abetting the acquisition of an illegal substance. This could result in revocation of their Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) licenses and even prison time.

In states where medical marijuana is legal, doctors can provide a "recommendation" for its use, but they cannot legally prescribe it. This recommendation typically requires determining and certifying that the patient has a debilitating condition that may be alleviated by marijuana, such as cancer, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, or HIV/AIDS. The patient can then use this recommendation to register with their state's database and obtain a medical marijuana ID card, allowing them to purchase marijuana from a dispensary.

The discrepancy between federal and state laws regarding marijuana has placed doctors in a challenging situation. They must balance the potential benefits of marijuana for their patients' health against the risk of violating federal law and losing their licenses. Additionally, the lack of clinical data and standardized dosage guidelines makes it difficult for doctors to recommend marijuana with the same confidence as conventional pharmaceutical medications.

It's important to note that there are some cannabis-related medications that are FDA-approved for specific conditions, such as seizures and chemotherapy side effects. However, these prescription medications are different from the medical cannabis products found at dispensaries, which have not undergone clinical trials involving humans.

Federal marijuana prisoners

The number of federal marijuana prisoners is not published by the US government, but it was estimated that there were approximately 10,560 individuals in 2015. This number is likely lower today, as federal enforcement of cannabis laws has declined over the years. However, the exact number is difficult to determine due to complexities in sentencing and reporting.

In 2022, a news story estimated the number to be around 2,700, which is considered a low estimate given the 2015 figure. The majority of marijuana convictions occur at the state level, where tens of thousands of prisoners are incarcerated for cannabis offenses each year. According to the ACLU, in 2018, there were well over half a million marijuana arrests, exceeding arrests for all violent crimes combined.

The Last Prisoner Project (LPP), a nonprofit dedicated to criminal justice reform through progressive drug policy, has been advocating for the release of all drug war prisoners and the repair of the harms caused by discriminatory policies. They have celebrated the release of individuals imprisoned for non-violent cannabis offenses, such as Marques Eiland and Esequiel Hernández, who served time for non-violent cannabis charges.

The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (CAOA) was intended to provide relief to those federally imprisoned for marijuana. However, its provisions only benefit a select few. Many prisoners serving time for marijuana-related offenses, such as gun possession or money laundering in connection with marijuana distribution, are excluded from relief under the CAOA. This has led to criticism and calls for more inclusive legislation that addresses the disproportionate impact of marijuana criminalization on Black and minority communities.

In October 2022, President Joe Biden pardoned thousands of individuals convicted of simple marijuana possession at the federal level or in the District of Columbia. He also called on state governors to follow suit and urged a review of how marijuana is classified under federal drug laws. While this move was celebrated by the cannabis industry and advocates, it was criticized by some as "window dressing," as there are no known federal prisoners who will be immediately affected by the pardons.

Cannabis businesses and banking services

Cannabis businesses often face challenges when it comes to finding banking solutions due to the drug's status under federal law. Marijuana remains a Schedule I drug under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), making it illegal to manufacture, distribute, or dispense. However, with the growing legalization of medical marijuana at the state level, financial institutions are navigating how to provide services to cannabis-related businesses while adhering to regulatory expectations.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has released guidance to assist financial institutions in meeting their Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) obligations when providing services to marijuana-related businesses operating within state laws. This guidance categorizes marijuana-related businesses into directly and indirectly related entities, with directly related businesses including growers, processors, and providers/dispensaries. Financial institutions must conduct comprehensive risk assessments and enhanced customer due diligence to ensure these businesses are legally authorized to operate within the state's legal framework.

Despite the complexities, some financial institutions have recognized the emerging legal cannabis industry's potential and are offering tailored banking solutions. These institutions provide various services, including checking and savings accounts, online and mobile banking, secure cash transport services, and dedicated cannabis banking experts. They also assist with compliance processes by simplifying and automating the reporting of sales and inventory data.

Additionally, organizations like Credit Union 1 and Green Check offer comprehensive lines of banking products specifically designed for cannabis businesses. These products include online banking, currency/coin fulfillment, direct deposit payroll, cash pick-up and delivery services, and electronic tax payments. Credit Union 1, for instance, is a preferred banking partner of The Chamber of Cannabis, a nonprofit organization working towards a more inclusive industry.

The SAFE Banking Act, pending congressional approval, further reinforces financial institutions' ability to service legitimate cannabis-related businesses. This act would prohibit regulators from barring banking institutions from offering services to these businesses, providing greater clarity and stability to the industry.

Transporting marijuana across state lines

Marijuana is a controlled substance under federal law, like cocaine or heroin. It is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance, which means it has a high potential for abuse and lacks any medical value. As a result, possessing, buying, or selling marijuana remains a federal crime, even if it is legal in your state.

This creates a situation where you could face federal charges for activities allowed by the laws of your home state. While federal agencies are mostly reluctant to charge individuals with cannabis-related crimes unless the drugs are associated with larger organized crime, gang activity, or impaired driving, transporting marijuana across state lines could result in federal criminal prosecution.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency provides information explaining the penalties for trafficking marijuana, which depend on the amount of marijuana being moved and whether it is the defendant's first or second offense. Even if you are transporting marijuana between two states where it is legal, it is still illegal under federal law to transport it across state lines.

In addition to federal laws, each state has its own laws and regulations regarding the transportation of marijuana. In some states, such as Colorado, individuals over the age of 21 can transport marijuana, but minors will face legal consequences. In other states, such as Washington, dispensaries must have a cannabis retailer license and follow specific transportation requirements. It is important to check with your state's licensing authorities before transporting marijuana.

While there have been efforts to change the treatment of marijuana at the federal level, it remains illegal to transport it across state lines. Those who possess marijuana and cross state lines run the risk that law enforcement from the neighboring state or the federal government will pursue criminal charges.

Marijuana and gun laws

Marijuana use has become increasingly common in the United States, with many states legalizing its use for medical or recreational purposes. However, the federal government still classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug, which means it is illegal under federal law. This creates a confusing legal landscape, particularly when it comes to the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Under federal law, it is illegal for anyone who uses marijuana to possess a firearm. Marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which prohibits anyone who uses illegal drugs from possessing firearms. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has issued guidance stating that anyone who uses marijuana, even if it is legal under state law, is considered an "unlawful user" of a controlled substance and is prohibited from possessing firearms. This includes medical marijuana users with a valid recommendation from a doctor.

The ATF Form 4473 asks potential gun buyers to answer the following question: "Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?" Answering "yes" will prompt the rejection of the purchase and may result in the cancellation of the gun license. Answering "no," however, would be a felony under federal law.

This conflict between state and federal law creates a challenging situation for gun owners who use marijuana. Admitting to marijuana use could result in losing their right to possess firearms, while denying it could lead to felony perjury charges. The penalties for violating federal law by possessing firearms while using marijuana can be severe, with a federal crime charge carrying a penalty of up to ten years in prison.

In some cases, gun owners who use marijuana may not even be aware that they are breaking the law, as they may not know that federal law prohibits the possession of firearms in this case. This confusion also impacts gun dealers, who must navigate the intricacies of state and federal marijuana laws. Gun dealers are required to perform background checks and ask potential buyers about their drug use. If a buyer admits to using marijuana, the dealer cannot sell them a firearm. If the buyer lies and is later found to be a marijuana user, the dealer could be held liable.

To address this complex situation, gun owners who use marijuana can seek legal advice from attorneys specializing in firearms law. Additionally, advocating for changes in the law, such as the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, can help eliminate the conflict between state and federal marijuana laws and protect the rights of gun owners who use marijuana.

In conclusion, while the legalization of marijuana in many states has created a confusing legal landscape, it is essential for gun owners who use marijuana to be aware of the federal laws prohibiting their possession of firearms. Seeking legal advice and advocating for changes in the law can help navigate and resolve this complex issue.

Frequently asked questions