South Carolina's Abortion Laws: Understanding The Current Landscape

Abortion laws in South Carolina have been subject to much change in recent years. The state currently enforces a six-week abortion ban, which was declared constitutional by the South Carolina Supreme Court on August 23, 2023. This ban was preceded by an earlier six-week ban, which was struck down by the same court in January 2023 for violating the state's privacy clause. South Carolina also prohibits abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization and in the third trimester. The state has various other restrictions on abortion access, including mandatory waiting periods, biased counseling, and ultrasound requirements. Minors seeking abortions must obtain consent from a parent or legal guardian or go through a judicial bypass process.

Abortion is banned at around 6 weeks of pregnancy

Abortion laws vary from state to state in the US, and South Carolina is one of the states with the most restrictive abortion laws. Abortion is banned at around 6 weeks of pregnancy in South Carolina, which is usually when cardiac activity is first detected. This means that abortion is illegal after a "fetal heartbeat" is detected, which is often around 6 weeks from the woman's last menstrual period. Many women are not even aware that they are pregnant at this early stage.

The South Carolina Supreme Court declared the ban constitutional on August 23, 2023, and it took effect immediately. This was not the first time such a ban had been passed in the state; a similar law was struck down in January 2023 for violating the state's privacy clause. The current ban has some exceptions, including when the pregnant person's life is at risk, there is a serious risk to their physical health, the fetus is not expected to survive, or the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest.

The history of abortion laws in South Carolina has been marked by fluctuations and legal challenges. The number of abortion clinics in the state has varied over the years, and South Carolinian women have often had to travel out of state to seek legal abortions. The state has also seen legislative attempts to further restrict abortion access, with proposals such as the "Fetal Heartbeat Protection from Abortion Act" and the "South Carolina Prenatal Equal Protection Act of 2023", which would have made women who had abortions eligible for the death penalty.

The debate around abortion in South Carolina continues to be a contentious issue, with legal challenges and protests from both sides of the argument.

Minors need consent from a parent or guardian

In South Carolina, all minors seeking an abortion need consent from a parent or guardian. If this is not an option, minors can also seek a judicial waiver (called a judicial bypass in many other states). This allows them to waive the requirement for parental involvement.

If you are a minor seeking an abortion in South Carolina, you can contact the If/When/How Judicial Bypass (JB) Helpline for help navigating the judicial bypass process. To contact the JB Helpline, call 844-868-2812 or submit a request online. You can also call 844-997-2229 to be confidentially connected with a trusted adult or lawyer for help navigating the process.

In South Carolina, a minor is defined as a female under the age of 17. If you are under 17, a parent or legal guardian must give you permission to get an abortion. If you are an emancipated minor (married or freed from the care, custody, and control of your parents by court order), you can give your own consent.

If a parent or guardian refuses to give consent for an abortion, a minor can petition the court for an order granting her the right to obtain an abortion without their consent. The court will appoint a guardian ad litem for the minor and will consider the minor's emotional development, maturity, intellect, and understanding; the nature and possible consequences of the abortion and of the alternatives; and other relevant evidence in making its decision.

It is important to note that South Carolina law imposes criminal penalties for performing an abortion on a minor without the required consent. Additionally, South Carolina has other restrictions on abortion access, including a ban on abortions after the detection of a "fetal heartbeat," which usually occurs around 6 weeks into a pregnancy.

Ultrasound images must be offered to those having an abortion

Ultrasound images are often used during abortion procedures to determine gestation and viability. In the United States, several states have laws that regulate the provision of an ultrasound before an abortion. In some states, abortion providers are instructed to show and describe the image to the pregnant woman (mandatory viewing).

In South Carolina, abortion is banned after the detection of a "fetal heartbeat", which usually occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. Women are required to view an ultrasound of the fetus before being allowed to have an abortion. This law was passed by Republican Representative Greg Delleney, who argued that the ultrasound would enable the woman to "determine for herself whether she is carrying an unborn child deserving of protection or whether it's just an inconvenient, unnecessary part of her body."

However, critics argue that these laws are a veiled attempt to personify the fetus and dissuade women from obtaining an abortion. Additionally, ultrasounds can add significantly to the cost of the procedure.

There are ethical challenges surrounding the use of ultrasounds during abortion preparations. On the one hand, some women may want to see the ultrasound image to gain a better understanding of their decision. On the other hand, others may not want to see the image as it could make the process more difficult emotionally.

In Norway, for example, there are no guidelines on whether to show ultrasound images during abortion preparations. A study found that some Norwegian women wanted to see the ultrasound image to help them make a decision, while others did not want to see it as they felt it would make choosing abortion harder. The study concluded that meeting the individual needs of each woman and respecting her autonomy during abortion preparations requires sensitivity, involvement, and dialogue skills from healthcare personnel.

In the United States, a study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law in Wisconsin. The study found that the law caused an increase in viewing rates and a small increase in the rate of women continuing their pregnancies. However, the majority of women were certain of their abortion decision, and the law did not change their minds.

Overall, the decision to offer ultrasound images during abortion procedures is complex and varies depending on the country and state. While some argue that it is important for women to have all the information before making a decision, others believe that mandatory viewing laws are coercive and infringe on women's autonomy.

Abortion providers face criminal penalties

Abortion laws in South Carolina are some of the most restrictive in the United States. Abortion is banned at around six weeks of pregnancy, which is usually before many women are aware that they are pregnant. The ban was signed into law by Governor Henry McMaster on May 25, 2023, and took effect immediately. However, it was blocked in court the following day and reinstated by the South Carolina Supreme Court on August 23, 2023.

The South Carolina abortion law imposes criminal penalties on providers, and they can face prosecution for performing abortions or providing the means for abortions. The specific penalties vary depending on the nature of the abortion and the circumstances in which it was carried out. For example, performing a "partial-birth" or "dismemberment" abortion is considered a state jail felony in South Carolina. Additionally, the law requires parental permission for minors seeking an abortion and mandates in-person counseling appointments at least three days prior to the procedure.

The history of abortion laws in South Carolina has been marked by fluctuations and legal challenges. In 2021, the South Carolina Supreme Court struck down a similar law that criminalized abortion once embryonic cardiac activity was detectable, which is around five or six weeks. The court deemed that the law violated the state's privacy clause under Article 1, Section 10 of the South Carolina Constitution. However, in 2023, the state passed another law, the "Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion" Act, which imposed an almost-total ban on abortions after the detection of cardiac activity. This law was also temporarily blocked by a judge but was later upheld by the South Carolina Supreme Court in August 2023.

The impact of these laws extends beyond legal consequences for abortion providers. They have also had significant effects on the availability of abortion services and the decisions made by pregnant individuals in South Carolina. The restrictions have resulted in many women travelling out of state to seek legal abortions, incurring additional costs and burdens. Furthermore, the laws have contributed to an environment of criminalization, where law enforcement misapplies existing laws and treats embryos and fetuses as "independent victims of crime." This has led to hundreds of people facing criminal charges related to pregnancy outcomes, miscarriage, and stillbirth.

The South Carolina abortion laws are part of a broader trend in the United States, with 14 states currently banning abortion and many others attempting to severely restrict access. These bans often include exceptions to prevent the death of the pregnant person and, in some cases, to preserve their physical and mental health. However, in practice, these exceptions can be unworkable and create confusion among patients and providers. The exceptions are often narrowly defined and leave the determination of applicability to entities other than the treating physician, further complicating the decision-making process.

Public funding for abortion is limited

South Carolina has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the United States. Abortion in South Carolina is banned at around 6 weeks of pregnancy, at which point many women are not yet aware that they are pregnant. This ban was signed into law by Governor Henry McMaster on May 25, 2023, and took effect immediately.

The limited public funding for abortion in South Carolina is part of a broader context of restrictive abortion laws in the state. In addition to the 6-week ban, South Carolina has several other restrictions on abortion access. For example, minors seeking an abortion in South Carolina must obtain permission from a parent or legal guardian, or seek a judicial bypass. The state also has a history of requiring women to undergo ultrasounds before being allowed to have an abortion, and there have been multiple attempts to implement stricter abortion bans.

The restrictive abortion laws in South Carolina have had significant impacts on women in the state. South Carolinian women have a long history of travelling outside the state to seek legal abortions, often having to travel greater distances and spend more money on the procedure. This has resulted in a high number of women from South Carolina obtaining abortions in neighbouring states such as Georgia and North Carolina.

The limited public funding for abortion in South Carolina further exacerbates the challenges faced by women seeking abortions in the state. The lack of state funding means that women may have to bear the full financial cost of the procedure, which can be especially burdensome for those with limited financial resources. This restriction on public funding for abortion contributes to the overall restrictive landscape of abortion access in South Carolina.

Frequently asked questions