Hansen's Unlawful Acts: A Study Of Chris Hansen's Crimes

Chris Hansen is an American television presenter, journalist, and YouTube personality. He gained popularity for his work on the show *To Catch a Predator*, where he caught potential internet predators using a sting operation. While the show was a success, it raised questions about the legality of Hansen's methods, with some arguing that it came close to entrapment. In 2021, Hansen was briefly arrested for failing to appear in court to present evidence in a sex trafficking case. He was also accused of larceny in 2019 for allegedly bouncing checks worth $13,000, although these charges were later dropped.

Entrapment

Chris Hansen is an American journalist and television presenter known for his work on the show *To Catch a Predator*, which aired from 2004 to 2007. The show involved Hansen and his team conducting sting operations to catch online predators. Volunteers would impersonate minor children in chat rooms and agree to meet adults for sex. The meeting places were "sting houses", where Hansen, camera crews, and sometimes local police, would await the potential sexual predators.

The show's premise has been criticised for coming close to entrapment. Entrapment is a legal concept that occurs when a person is induced to commit a criminal offence by a state agent or someone acting on their behalf, such as an informant. In the context of Hansen's work, entrapment would mean that he or his team persuaded or induced the targets to commit a crime they otherwise would not have committed.

While the line between entrapment and legitimate sting operations can be blurry, there are a few key factors that can help determine whether entrapment has occurred:

• Provocation or Persuasion: If Hansen or his team actively persuaded or pressured the targets to engage in criminal behaviour, it could be considered entrapment. For example, if they used coercive tactics, emotional manipulation, or persistent requests to convince someone to agree to meet a minor, it could be seen as entrapment.
• Pre-existing Intent: If the targets already demonstrated a clear intent to commit a criminal act before any interaction with Hansen or his team, it is less likely to be considered entrapment. For instance, if they actively sought out minors for sexual encounters and willingly participated in graphic sexual conversations, it suggests a pre-existing intent.
• Deceptive Tactics: The use of deception alone does not constitute entrapment. However, if Hansen or his team lied about certain facts or presented themselves in a misleading way to induce criminal behaviour, it could be a factor in determining entrapment.
• Public Interest: Sting operations targeting sexual predators often argue that they serve the public interest by protecting potential victims and raising awareness. While this doesn't negate entrapment, it can be a mitigating factor in how the actions are legally perceived.

It's important to note that the legal definition of entrapment and the specific criteria for determining its occurrence can vary across different jurisdictions.

In the case of Hansen's work, there were likely careful measures taken to ensure the operations did not constitute entrapment. The involvement of law enforcement and the presence of police during the sting operations also changes the legal dynamics. Additionally, it's worth noting that some of the cases stemming from Hansen's show were reportedly thrown out due to various reasons, which may or may not have included entrapment.

Vigilante justice

Chris Hansen is a journalist, television presenter, and YouTube personality. He gained popularity for his work on the show *Dateline NBC*, where he hosted a segment called "To Catch a Predator." In this segment, Hansen, in collaboration with the controversial vigilante group Perverted Justice, conducted sting operations to catch potential online predators. Volunteers from Perverted Justice would impersonate minor children in chat rooms and agree to meet adults for sex. These meetings would take place in ""sting houses," where Hansen, camera crews, and sometimes local police would await the potential sexual predators.

While Hansen's work has led to the apprehension and exposure of many potential predators, it has also sparked debates and controversies about the legality and ethics of his methods. Some have argued that his tactics constitute entrapment, and there have been instances where cases were thrown out or settled out of court due to concerns about the legality of the evidence obtained.

In one particular instance, Hansen found himself on the other side of the law. In 2021, he was briefly arrested for failing to appear in court regarding a separate sex trafficking case. Hansen was expected to present video evidence against three men charged with attempting to solicit underage girls for sex. He provided an edited video but was asked to provide the complete footage, which he failed to do before the court hearing. As a result, a warrant was issued for his arrest, and he turned himself in. Hansen's lawyer claimed that the missed court appearance was due to a misunderstanding regarding a subpoena.

The line between vigilantism and justice is a fine one. While Hansen's work has undoubtedly led to the exposure and apprehension of potential predators, the methods employed have also raised legal and ethical concerns. The collaboration with law enforcement adds a level of legitimacy to his operations, but it is important to recognize that even with police involvement, the potential for crossing ethical boundaries and violating laws remains.

In the case of his arrest, Hansen's actions can be viewed as a form of vigilantism as he took it upon himself to withhold evidence that could potentially exonerate the accused. By not complying with the court's request to provide the unedited footage, Hansen interfered with the legal process, which is typically the domain of law enforcement and the justice system. This incident highlights the complexities and potential consequences of vigilante justice, even when it is carried out with the best of intentions.

Criminal impersonation

In the state of Connecticut, criminal impersonation is defined as:

> (a) A person is guilty of criminal impersonation when such person: (1) Impersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another; (5) with intent to defraud, deceive or injure another, uses an electronic device to impersonate another and such act results in personal injury or financial loss to another or the initiation of judicial proceedings against another.

In an episode of Hansen vs. Predator, Chris Hansen posed as a 13-year-old girl online and lured men into his house, where a 19-year-old decoy was present. After the decoy left, Hansen appeared and questioned the men before letting them go, at which point they were arrested by the police.

One source argues that Hansen is not impersonating an actual person. They argue that there is a difference between exploiting a relationship and pretending to be someone else. They also question at what point Hansen would be impersonating someone, asking whether a 63-year-old claiming to be 62 would count as impersonation.

Another source disagrees, arguing that Hansen is pretending to be someone he is not, including someone of a different age, name, and appearance. They also point out that Hansen is benefiting from the activity through the additional publicity and advertisement for his show.

It is worth noting that Hansen did not make the arrests, and that he worked in collaboration with law enforcement and volunteers from the controversial vigilante group Perverted Justice.

Larceny

When the payments for these items bounced, Hansen offered to pay the vendor in instalments. However, the owner declined this offer. Hansen then sent multiple emails to the owner, requesting more time to pay and even offered to sell some of his personal belongings to cover the debt. Unfortunately, the second check he provided also bounced.

As a result of his failure to make good on the payments, Hansen was arrested in Stamford, Connecticut, and charged with larceny. This incident brought negative publicity to Hansen, who had built a career on exposing and confronting sexual predators.

Following his arrest, Hansen turned himself into the police and cooperated with the authorities. He was released after his lawyer, Philip Russell, proved to the judge that Hansen had paid the money owed to the local business owner. As a result, the larceny charge against him was dropped, and the case was resolved.

It is important to note that larceny is a serious offence that can have significant legal consequences. In the case of Chris Hansen, the matter was resolved without a conviction, but it still attracted media attention and impacted his public image.

To avoid such situations, it is crucial to uphold honest and ethical business practices, ensuring that payments are made in full and on time to avoid any allegations of wrongdoing.

Failure to appear in court

In July 2021, Chris Hansen was arrested for failing to appear in court. The former host of *To Catch a Predator* surrendered to authorities and was briefly detained at the Shiawassee County jail in Corunna, Michigan. Hansen was required to present video evidence against three men charged with attempting to solicit underage girls for sex. Hansen did provide an edited video, but one of the defendants demanded the complete footage, which he argued could provide exonerating evidence. Hansen's lawyer claimed that his client missed the court hearing because of confusion over a subpoena. Hansen was eventually released and given 14 days to deliver the uncut video.

This was not the first time Hansen had been arrested. In January 2019, he was charged with larceny after a check bounced with a vendor who delivered promotional items. Hansen turned himself in to the police in Connecticut and was later released when the charges were dropped.

Frequently asked questions